+1 The ~32MB limit is just ridiculous :) Thanks, Eduard On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Paul Libbrecht <paul(a)hoplahup.net> wrote:

Yes +1 as it's long overdue Ludovic -- *Ludovic Dubost* *Founder and CEO* ludovic(a)xwiki.com skype: ldubost Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:

I suppose it goes without saying that I would be +1 but we should also make note that the limit must also be reaised in the XWikiPreferences which is not user-accessable so we can. A. Raise it ourselves to a sane number like 100MB B. Expose the parameter in the administration application C. A and B D. Nothing Even if we do nothing, it will be eaiser for people in the future if new installs are getting FS attachments be default. Thanks, Caleb On 24/03/16 11:48, Eduard Moraru wrote:

+0 As Thomas said, it would be better to also fix the issues, this should not be that hard. There is also other aspects that deserve attention: - migrating users, that should be warned and provided better way to migrate than a snippet IMO. - the fact that user data will no more be in a single place, and that user may miss the permanent directory for their backup, especially because it does not contains other precious information so far. We should raise more attention on that point. This second point is quite important IMO, this is why I am not really +1, I actually prefer limitation and safety, but I understand why we want to change. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com > +0 > > I feel that we should first fix the two issues you mentioned. The > second one should not be too hard to fix (it's just about listening to > WikiDeletedEvent and do some cleanup I guess). > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> > > Hi devs, > > > > It’s been a very long time that Caleb has implemented fileystem storage > and we still see people regularly stuggling to attach largish attachments > to their wiki. I think it’s time that we make it the default even if the > implementation is still not perfect. > > > > Namely here are the opened issue related to filesystem store: > > > https://jira.xwiki.org/issues/?jql=component%20%3D%20%22Storage%20-%20File%… > > > > Tha main 2 issues are: > > - XWiki.DeletedAttachments shows nothing when filesystem attachments are > enabled. > > - FS Attachments does not delete files when a subwiki has been removed > > > > I’m proposing for the moment to add a warning to the deleted attachments > tab on AllDocs when fs attachment is on. > > > > I think the pros outbalances the cons. WDYT? > > > > Here’s my +1 > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs(a)xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO

On 03/24/2016 08:02 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: https://github.com/phenotips/phenotips/tree/master/components/storage-migra… -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: There's no guarantee that the issues will be fixed after we enable File System attachments by default, unless we put in on the roadmap (with someone assigned to it), but then what stopped us from putting it on the roadmap before? We may be going forward but we introduce regressions. So I'm not fully convinced, +0. Thanks, Marius