[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
30 Mar
2011
30 Mar
'11
2:28 p.m.
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields of
@Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and also
to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
30 Mar
30 Mar
2:37 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 14:28, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Is @Component really required in that case ? Do we have to explicitly
use @Named("default") for default hint ?
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 for anything going in the direction of using JSR330
--
Thomas Mortagne
2:41 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Thanks
-Vincent
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 14:28, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Yes we still need to discover component declarations.
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Is @Component really required in that case ? Do we have to explicitly
use @Named("default") for default hint ?
No.
CDI says that @Default annotations are not required.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
+1 for anything going in the direction of using JSR330
--
Thomas Mortagne
2:49 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 14:41, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I mean if it's just for discovering we could change the test on
@Component to check @Component || @Named
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 14:28, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Yes we still need to discover component declarations. Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Is @Component really required in that case ? Do we have to explicitly
use @Named("default") for default hint ?
No.
CDI says that @Default annotations are not required.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
+1 for anything going in the direction of using JSR330
--
Thomas Mortagne
2:56 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 14:41, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
We could but I don't like it too much since it's uneven. @Named doesn't
semantically means it's a component.
What I'd prefer is find out how CDI impl do it and do the same (since they don't
need any annotation for Roles and Components).
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I mean if it's just for discovering we could change the test on
@Component to check @Component || @Named On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 14:28, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Yes we still need to discover component declarations. Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Is @Component really required in that case ?
>
>> Do we have to explicitly
>> use @Named("default") for default hint ?
>
> No.
>
> CDI says that @Default annotations are not required.
>
>>>
>>> Here's my +1
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>
>> +1 for anything going in the direction of using JSR330
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
2:48 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
On 03/30/2011 02:28 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Here's my +1
+1. Will the old mechanism continue to work for a while, for backwards
compatibility?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
2:48 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:28 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Sure. It's only about marking it deprecated.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Here's my +1
+1. Will the old mechanism continue to work for a while, for backwards
compatibility? 
3:04 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
+1 @Named.
0 for switching to @Qualifier, IMO we should sniff the wind and find out if people are
generally
choosing @Named or @Qualifier.
Superior technology doesn't help much if the rest of the world abandons it.
Caleb
On 03/30/2011 08:28 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On 03/30/2011 03:28 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of @Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection points and
also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
31 Mar
31 Mar
3:31 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Use @Named (and @Qualifier annotations later on) for specifying component role
+0
Denis
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 15:17, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On 03/30/2011 03:28 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to deprecate the "value" and "hints" fields
of
@Component and instead use the @Named annotation (and @Qualifier annotations
later on).
The rationale is to align with JSR330's @Named annotation at injection
points
and also to start going in the direction of CDI (JSR299) since CDI
uses @Named for beans too.
Example before:
@Component("hint")
public class MyComponent...
After:
@Component
@Named("hint")
public class MyComponent
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5328
days inactive
5329
days old
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol