29 May
2017
29 May
'17
5 p.m.
GSoC Coding Part Finally starts tomorrow, so the highest time to get down
to work.
I created modest design page where I put summary of general idea of my
project:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Moreextensionrepositories
To start coding I need:
1. A confirmed naming pattern for the extensions that I will develop. My
suggestion is "..... Integration" e.g. "Pypi Integration"
"Bintray
Integration" Imho, the names of possible repositories are popular and
verbose enough to impy that the integration is about extension repository.
What do you think?
2. Repositories on https://github.com/xwiki-contrib One per each extension
(i.e. external) repository: Bintray, Pypi, NPM. Is it enough if I ask for
it here or should I create some official request?
3. Some space somewhere in XWiki ecosystem where I would be able to
document progress and decisions made - things much more detailed and
low-level that are normally presented on design pages or
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ pages.
Best,
Krzysztof Płachno
29 May
29 May
5:26 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [GSoC] More extension repositories
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Krzysiek Płachno
<krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
GSoC Coding Part Finally starts tomorrow, so the
highest time to get down
to work.
I created modest design page where I put summary of general idea of my
project:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Moreextensionrepositories
You should probably add some link to
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/ExtensionManagerRepositories
which have more of less the same goal than your page.
To start coding I need:
1. A confirmed naming pattern for the extensions that I will develop. My
suggestion is "..... Integration" e.g. "Pypi Integration"
"Bintray
Integration" Imho, the names of possible repositories are popular and
verbose enough to impy that the integration is about extension repository.
What do you think?
I'm not a big fan of the very vague "Integration" term in this
context. Does not say much about what the extension does, even when
you know what Pypi is (which might not be so obvious for Java folks).
I think I would prefer something like "Pypi Extensions Support" but
not sure either. Maybe others have some ideas ? Anyway you have time
for the extension display name which will be important when you do
your first release mostly.
2. Repositories on https://github.com/xwiki-contrib One per each extension
(i.e. external) repository: Bintray, Pypi, NPM. Is it enough if I ask for
it here or should I create some official request?
I will create 3 repositories.
For the repositories names I was thinking about:
* repository-pypi
* repository-bintray
* repository-pypinpm
which is in line with the current "<type>-<name>" based naming on
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HChoosingthename.
WDYT ?
3. Some space somewhere in XWiki ecosystem where I would be able to
document progress and decisions made - things much more detailed and
low-level that are normally presented on design pages or
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ pages.
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Moreextensionrepositories
is fine for this IMO. It can be as low level as you want. Once you
made your first release then documentation will go to your new
extension documentation page on extensions.xwiki.org.
Each extension gets a dedicated space on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ so you have
plenty of room to put as many details as you want and keep something
hight level with links to the details in the extension home page.
Best,
Krzysztof Płachno
--
Thomas Mortagne
30 May
30 May
11:06 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [GSoC] More extension repositories
2017-05-29 17:26 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
It's ok. Will I have rights to those repos?
Ok, then I will put documentation on desing page.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Krzysiek Płachno
<krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok - makes sense ;) "xxxxx Extensions Support" sounds ok as well.
GSoC Coding Part Finally starts tomorrow, so the
highest time to get down
to work.
I created modest design page where I put summary of general idea of my
project:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
Moreextensionrepositories
You should probably add some link to
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/ExtensionManagerRepositories
which have more of less the same goal than your page.
To start coding I need:
1. A confirmed naming pattern for the extensions that I will develop. My
suggestion is "..... Integration" e.g. "Pypi Integration"
"Bintray
Integration" Imho, the names of possible repositories are popular and
verbose enough to impy that the integration is about extension
repository.
What do you think?
I'm not a big fan of the very vague "Integration" term in this
context. Does not say much about what the extension does, even when
you know what Pypi is (which might not be so obvious for Java folks).
I think I would prefer something like "Pypi Extensions Support" but
not sure either. Maybe others have some ideas ? Anyway you have time
for the extension display name which will be important when you do
your first release mostly.
2. Repositories on https://github.com/xwiki-contrib One per each
extension
(i.e. external) repository: Bintray, Pypi, NPM.
Is it enough if I ask for
it here or should I create some official request?
I will create 3 repositories.
For the repositories names I was thinking about:
* repository-pypi
* repository-bintray
* repository-pypinpm
which is in line with the current "<type>-<name>" based naming on
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HChoosingthename.
WDYT ?
3. Some space somewhere in XWiki ecosystem where I would be able to
document progress and decisions made - things much more detailed and
low-level that are normally presented on design pages or
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ pages.
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Moreextensionrepositories
is fine for this IMO. It can be as low level as you want. Once you
made your first release then documentation will go to your new
extension documentation page on extensions.xwiki.org.
Each extension gets a dedicated space on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ so you have
plenty of room to put as many details as you want and keep something
hight level with links to the details in the extension home page.
Best,
Krzysztof Płachno
--
Thomas Mortagne
10:42 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [GSoC] More extension repositories
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Krzysiek Płachno
<krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's ok. Will I have rights to those repos?
Created them, you have full write on them.
Ok, then I will put documentation on desing page.
>
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Krzysztof Płachno
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
2017-05-29 17:26 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
This question will probably deserve a dedicated mail after thinking a
bit about it later.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Krzysiek
Płachno
<krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok - makes sense ;) "xxxxx Extensions Support" sounds ok as well. GSoC Coding Part Finally starts tomorrow, so the
highest time to get down
to work.
I created modest design page where I put summary of general idea of my
project:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
Moreextensionrepositories
You should probably add some link to
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/ExtensionManagerRepositories
which have more of less the same goal than your page.
To start coding I need:
1. A confirmed naming pattern for the extensions that I will develop. My
suggestion is "..... Integration" e.g. "Pypi Integration"
"Bintray
Integration" Imho, the names of possible repositories are popular and
verbose enough to impy that the integration is about extension
repository.
What do you think?
I'm not a big fan of the very vague "Integration" term in this
context. Does not say much about what the extension does, even when
you know what Pypi is (which might not be so obvious for Java folks).
I think I would prefer something like "Pypi Extensions Support" but
not sure either. Maybe others have some ideas ? Anyway you have time
for the extension display name which will be important when you do
your first release mostly.
2. Repositories on https://github.com/xwiki-contrib One per each
extension
(i.e. external) repository: Bintray, Pypi, NPM.
Is it enough if I ask for
it here or should I create some official request?
I will create 3 repositories.
For the repositories names I was thinking about:
* repository-pypi
* repository-bintray
* repository-pypinpm
which is in line with the current "<type>-<name>" based naming on
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HChoosingthename.
WDYT ?
3. Some space somewhere in XWiki ecosystem where I would be able to
document progress and decisions made - things much more detailed and
low-level that are normally presented on design pages or
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ pages.
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Moreextensionrepositories
is fine for this IMO. It can be as low level as you want. Once you
made your first release then documentation will go to your new
extension documentation page on extensions.xwiki.org.
Each extension gets a dedicated space on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ so you have
plenty of room to put as many details as you want and keep something
hight level with links to the details in the extension home page.
31 May
31 May
9:23 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [GSoC] More extension repositories
Thanks!
KP
2017-05-30 22:42 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Krzysiek Płachno
<krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok - makes sense ;) "xxxxx Extensions Support" sounds ok as well.
This question will probably deserve a dedicated mail after thinking a
bit about it later.
It's ok. Will I have rights to those repos?
Created them, you have full write on them.
--
Thomas Mortagne
2017-05-29 17:26 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Krzysiek Płachno
> <krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > GSoC Coding Part Finally starts tomorrow, so the highest time to get
down
> > to work.
> >
> > I created modest design page where I put summary of general idea of my
> > project:
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
> Moreextensionrepositories
>
> You should probably add some link to
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/
ExtensionManagerRepositories
> which have more of less the same goal than
your page.
>
> >
> > To start coding I need:
> >
> > 1. A confirmed naming pattern for the extensions that I will develop.
My
suggestion is "..... Integration" e.g.
"Pypi Integration" "Bintray
Integration" Imho, the names of possible repositories are popular and
verbose enough to impy that the integration is about extension
repository.
What do you think?
I'm not a big fan of the very vague "Integration" term in this
context. Does not say much about what the extension does, even when
you know what Pypi is (which might not be so obvious for Java folks).
I think I would prefer something like "Pypi Extensions Support" but
not sure either. Maybe others have some ideas ? Anyway you have time
for the extension display name which will be important when you do
your first release mostly.
>
> >
> > 2. Repositories on https://github.com/xwiki-contrib One per each
> extension
> > (i.e. external) repository: Bintray, Pypi, NPM. Is it enough if I ask
for
it here or should I create some official request?
I will create 3 repositories.
For the repositories names I was thinking about:
* repository-pypi
* repository-bintray
* repository-pypinpm
which is in line with the current "<type>-<name>" based naming on
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HChoosingthename.
WDYT ?
> >
> > 3. Some space somewhere in XWiki ecosystem where I would be able to
> > document progress and decisions made - things much more detailed and
> > low-level that are normally presented on design pages or
> > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ pages.
>
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
Moreextensionrepositories
is fine
for this IMO. It can be as low level as you want. Once you
made your first release then documentation will go to your new
extension documentation page on extensions.xwiki.org.
Each extension gets a dedicated space on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ so you have
plenty of room to put as many details as you want and keep something
hight level with links to the details in the extension home page.
Ok, then I will put documentation on desing page.
>
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Krzysztof Płachno
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>
1 Jun
1 Jun
11:02 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [GSoC] More extension repositories
As regards name of extensions: I've just found that integration with
external repositories is called as "Connector":
- Extension Repository Connector - XWiki -
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Extension%20Module/Rep…
- Extension Repository Connector - Maven -
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Extension%20Module/Rep…
So according to this convention, names for my new extension would be:
- Extension Repository Connector - Bintray
- Extension Repository Connector - Pypi
- Extension Repository Connector - NPM
This "Extension Repository" part - however implies that this extension
might be related with Extensions Repository Application (
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Repository%20Applicati…),
but well maybe it's not that misleading :P
WDYT?
KP
2017-05-31 9:23 GMT+02:00 Krzysiek Płachno <krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com>om>:
Thanks!
KP
2017-05-30 22:42 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Krzysiek
Płachno
<krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This question will probably deserve a dedicated mail after thinking a
bit about it later.
Created them, you have full write on them.
--
Thomas Mortagne
2017-05-29 17:26 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Krzysiek Płachno
> <krzysiekplachno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > GSoC Coding Part Finally starts tomorrow, so the highest time to get
down
> > to work.
> >
> > I created modest design page where I put summary of general idea of
my
> > project:
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
> Moreextensionrepositories
>
> You should probably add some link to
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/ExtensionManag
erRepositories
> which have more of less the same goal than
your page.
>
> >
> > To start coding I need:
> >
> > 1. A confirmed naming pattern for the extensions that I will
develop. My
>
suggestion is "..... Integration" e.g. "Pypi Integration"
"Bintray
> Integration" Imho, the names of possible repositories are popular and
> verbose enough to impy that the integration is about extension
repository.
> What do you think?
I'm not a big fan of the very vague "Integration" term in this
context. Does not say much about what the extension does, even when
you know what Pypi is (which might not be so obvious for Java folks).
I think I would prefer something like "Pypi Extensions Support" but
not sure either. Maybe others have some ideas ? Anyway you have time
for the extension display name which will be important when you do
your first release mostly.
Ok - makes sense ;) "xxxxx Extensions Support" sounds ok as well.
>
> >
> > 2. Repositories on https://github.com/xwiki-contrib One per each
> extension
> > (i.e. external) repository: Bintray, Pypi, NPM. Is it enough if I
ask
for
> it
here or should I create some official request?
I will create 3 repositories.
For the repositories names I was thinking about:
* repository-pypi
* repository-bintray
* repository-pypinpm
which is in line with the current "<type>-<name>" based naming on
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HChoosingthename.
WDYT ?
It's ok. Will I have rights to those repos?
> >
> > 3. Some space somewhere in XWiki ecosystem where I would be able to
> > document progress and decisions made - things much more detailed and
> > low-level that are normally presented on design pages or
> > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ pages.
>
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Moreextensio
nrepositories
is fine
for this IMO. It can be as low level as you want. Once you
made your first release then documentation will go to your new
extension documentation page on extensions.xwiki.org.
Each extension gets a dedicated space on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ so you have
plenty of room to put as many details as you want and keep something
hight level with links to the details in the extension home page.
Ok, then I will put documentation on desing page.
>
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Krzysztof Płachno
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>
2717
days inactive
2720
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Krzysiek Płachno -
Thomas Mortagne