Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r27429 - platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web
4 Mar
2010
4 Mar
'10
10:54 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:48, sdumitriu
<platform-notifications(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2010-03-03 13:48:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 27429
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
Log:
XWIKI-4955: Page with empty content leads to "This template does not exist"
message when viewed in plain mode
Revert the trim() removal, which makes all the validation tests fail
Then the wrong template should be fixed instead of putting a hack...
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:44:52 UTC (rev 27428)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:48:22 UTC (rev 27429)
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
// Replace all placeholders with the protected values
content = replacePlaceholders(content, context);
disablePlaceholders(context);
- content = context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content,
context);
+ content = context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content.trim(),
context);
} catch (IOException e) {
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOG.debug("IOException while evaluating template [" + template
+ "] from /templates/", e);
_______________________________________________
notifications mailing list
notifications(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/notifications
--
Thomas Mortagne
4 Mar
4 Mar
1:56 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r27429 - platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web
On 03/04/2010 10:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:48, sdumitriu
<platform-notifications(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
It is not a hack, and there is not one wrong template. All the templates
generate whitespaces. I still believe that there is absolutely no reason
not to use the trim(), since nobody cares if the whitespace reaches the
client or not. If you don't agree, feel free to hunt all the whitespace
in the templates, including those in custom skins that duplicate the
templates.
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2010-03-03 13:48:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 27429
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
Log:
XWIKI-4955: Page with empty content leads to "This template does not exist"
message when viewed in plain mode
Revert the trim() removal, which makes all the validation tests fail
Then the wrong template should be fixed instead of putting a hack... >
> Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
> ===================================================================
> --- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:44:52 UTC (rev 27428)
> +++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:48:22 UTC (rev 27429)
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
> // Replace all placeholders with the protected values
> content = replacePlaceholders(content, context);
> disablePlaceholders(context);
> - content = context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content,
context);
> + content =
context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content.trim(), context);
> } catch (IOException e) {
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.debug("IOException while evaluating template [" +
template + "] from /templates/", e);
>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
2:11 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r27429 - platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 03/04/2010 10:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I agree that it's a good idea to protect against overridden templates in custom
skins.
-Vincent
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:48, sdumitriu
<platform-notifications(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
It is not a hack, and there is not one wrong template. All the templates
generate whitespaces. I still believe that there is absolutely no reason
not to use the trim(), since nobody cares if the whitespace reaches the
client or not. If you don't agree, feel free to hunt all the whitespace
in the templates, including those in custom skins that duplicate the
templates. Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2010-03-03 13:48:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 27429
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
Log:
XWIKI-4955: Page with empty content leads to "This template does not exist"
message when viewed in plain mode
Revert the trim() removal, which makes all the validation tests fail
Then the wrong template should be fixed instead of putting a hack... >> Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
>> ===================================================================
>> --- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:44:52 UTC (rev 27428)
>> +++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:48:22 UTC (rev 27429)
>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
>> // Replace all placeholders with the protected values
>> content = replacePlaceholders(content, context);
>> disablePlaceholders(context);
>> - content = context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content,
context);
>> + content =
context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content.trim(), context);
>> } catch (IOException e) {
>> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
>> LOG.debug("IOException while evaluating template [" +
template + "] from /templates/", e);
>>
3:01 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r27429 - platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 13:56, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 03/04/2010 10:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
There is 16 wrong templates plus macro template itself is wrong and
for most of them it's just one line that needs ##.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:48, sdumitriu
<platform-notifications(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
It is not a hack, and there is not one wrong template. All the templates Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2010-03-03 13:48:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 27429
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
Log:
XWIKI-4955: Page with empty content leads to "This template does not exist"
message when viewed in plain mode
Revert the trim() removal, which makes all the validation tests fail
Then the wrong template should be fixed instead of putting a hack... generate whitespaces. I still believe that there is
absolutely no reason
A template don't have to generate white spaces and the issue are not
all templates that generated whites spaces, we just need to fix
templates that generate white space before the actual xhtml content
(i.e. before "<?xml..." in htmlheader.vm),
not to use the trim(), since nobody cares if the
whitespace reaches the
The problem is that you only think about full xhtml content, in that
case yes we don't care about triming that content but that's not our
only use case. You could write templates that return some content you
want to get exactly like it was. An example: you need to write a
service in a document to return the exact content of an object or the
content of the document, with this you will be forced to inject
directly your content in the response object and use
$context.setFinished(true) which is a pain.
It's a hack because at Utils level we have no idea what is the
content, safest is to let user decide how he want to use the content
he produced, you can say you don't care as much as you want i still
don't see how we could decide that noone is allowed to take white
space as meaningful content...
If the goal is to protect against UI templates badly written we should
limit this trim() only to xhtml or html MIME types.
client or not. If you don't agree, feel free to
hunt all the whitespace
in the templates, including those in custom skins that duplicate the
templates.
--
Thomas Mortagne
>
> Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
> ===================================================================
> --- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:44:52 UTC (rev 27428)
> +++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
2010-03-03 12:48:22 UTC (rev 27429)
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
> // Replace all placeholders with the protected values
> content = replacePlaceholders(content, context);
> disablePlaceholders(context);
> - content = context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content,
context);
> + content =
context.getWiki().getPluginManager().endParsing(content.trim(), context);
> } catch (IOException e) {
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.debug("IOException while evaluating template [" +
template + "] from /templates/", e);
>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5 Mar
5 Mar
4:42 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r27429 - platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web
On 03/04/2010 03:01 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 13:56, Sergiu
Dumitriu<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Sending plain content is not the only option. You can (and should) put
it in a wrapper, either XML or JSON.
On 03/04/2010 10:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
There is 16 wrong templates plus macro template itself is wrong and
for most of them it's just one line that needs ##.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:48, sdumitriu
<platform-notifications(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
It is not a hack, and there is not one wrong template. All the templates Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2010-03-03 13:48:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 27429
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
Log:
XWIKI-4955: Page with empty content leads to "This template does not exist"
message when viewed in plain mode
Revert the trim() removal, which makes all the validation tests fail
Then the wrong template should be fixed instead of putting a hack... generate whitespaces. I still believe that there
is absolutely no reason
A template don't have to generate white spaces and the issue are not
all templates that generated whites spaces, we just need to fix
templates that generate white space before the actual xhtml content
(i.e. before "<?xml..." in htmlheader.vm),
not to use the trim(), since nobody cares if the
whitespace reaches the
The problem is that you only think about full xhtml content, in that
case yes we don't care about triming that content but that's not our
only use case. You could write templates that return some content you
want to get exactly like it was. An example: you need to write a
service in a document to return the exact content of an object or the
content of the document, with this you will be forced to inject
directly your content in the response object and use
$context.setFinished(true) which is a pain. It's a hack because at Utils level we have no idea
what is the
content, safest is to let user decide how he want to use the content
he produced, you can say you don't care as much as you want i still
don't see how we could decide that noone is allowed to take white
space as meaningful content...
If the goal is to protect against UI templates badly written we should
limit this trim() only to xhtml or html MIME types.
And RDF, and SOAP, and all the other XML types. And CSV. It's irrelevant
for JSON. PDF/RTF/XAR/ZIP are unaffected, since they don't use the
parseTemplate logic. The only one that is affected is text/plain.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
10:14 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r27429 - platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 04:42, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
I said "protect against UI templates" i know there is other content
that don't care about white spaces but i expected theses ones to be
coded properly...
On 03/04/2010 03:01 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I call that a workaround for a limitation. My only point is that i
can't find one good reason to trim content all the time and you did
not gave any (sending several bytes less is not...). IMO we do
something when it's needed not because "it's ok to do that nobody
cares".
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 13:56, Sergiu
Dumitriu<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Sending plain content is not the only option. You can (and should) put
it in a wrapper, either XML or JSON. On 03/04/2010 10:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
There is 16 wrong templates plus macro template itself is wrong and
for most of them it's just one line that needs ##.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:48, sdumitriu
<platform-notifications(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
> Author: sdumitriu
> Date: 2010-03-03 13:48:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
> New Revision: 27429
>
> Modified:
> platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/web/Utils.java
> Log:
> XWIKI-4955: Page with empty content leads to "This template does not exist"
message when viewed in plain mode
> Revert the trim() removal, which makes all the validation tests fail
Then the wrong template should be fixed instead of putting a hack...
It is not a hack, and there is not one wrong template. All the templates generate whitespaces. I still believe that there
is absolutely no reason
A template don't have to generate white spaces and the issue are not
all templates that generated whites spaces, we just need to fix
templates that generate white space before the actual xhtml content
(i.e. before "<?xml..." in htmlheader.vm),
not to use the trim(), since nobody cares if the
whitespace reaches the
The problem is that you only think about full xhtml content, in that
case yes we don't care about triming that content but that's not our
only use case. You could write templates that return some content you
want to get exactly like it was. An example: you need to write a
service in a document to return the exact content of an object or the
content of the document, with this you will be forced to inject
directly your content in the response object and use
$context.setFinished(true) which is a pain. It's a hack because at Utils level we have no
idea what is the
content, safest is to let user decide how he want to use the content
he produced, you can say you don't care as much as you want i still
don't see how we could decide that noone is allowed to take white
space as meaningful content...
If the goal is to protect against UI templates badly written we should
limit this trim() only to xhtml or html MIME types.
And RDF, and SOAP, and all the other XML types. And CSV. It's irrelevant
for JSON. PDF/RTF/XAR/ZIP are unaffected, since they don't use the
parseTemplate logic. The only one that is affected is text/plain. --
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
5312
days inactive
5313
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol