Hi,
+1 for enabled by default while being skippable if needed.
Thanks,
Alex
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> +1 I would like to not have pages since 2005 anymore, hope everything else
> will be ok
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:11 PM Clément Aubin <aubincleme(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 for enabled by default while being skippable if needed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Clément
> >
> > On 07/31/2018 06:52 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Adel Atallah
<adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com>
>
wrote:
> > >> +1 enabled by default,
obviously.
> > >>
> > >> Le mar. 31 juil. 2018 18:43, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
a
> > écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> Hi, devs.
> > >>>
> > >>> We have had 2 previous discussions on this topic:
> > >>> * July 2016 (discussion):
https://markmail.org/thread/
> oodciq7pv6pj7eic
> > >>> * Jan 2018 (proposal):
https://markmail.org/thread/ymwsebvr3k7voy3p
> > >>>
> > >>> And we have at least 2 issues on this topic:
> > >>> * Oct 2011: XWIKI-7058
<http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-7058>:
> Page
> > >>> creation date should be the date of the installation
> > >>> * Feb 2015: XCOMMONS-1447 <https://jira.xwiki.org/
> browse/XCOMMONS-1447
> > >:
> > >>> XAR plugin should replace the dates with a common number
> > >>>
> > >>> TL;DR: It's causing confusion for our users to install pages
that are
> > >>> created in 2005/2009/etc. so we should avoid committing dates on
git
> > that
> > >>> users might end up installing.
> > >>>
> > >>> Reminder: Importing a document with empty dates will:
> > >>> * Use the current date if the document is new (i.e. does not exist
in
> > the
> > >>> wiki)
> > >>> * Use the existing dates if the document already exists in the
wiki,
> if
> > >>> using backup import
> > >>> * Use the current user and current date for the document update
date,
> > if
> > >>> imported using non-backup import of EM extension install
> > >>>
> > >>> Adel and myself have extended the xar:verify and xar:format goals
of
> > the
> > >>> xar plugin to check for the existence of date fields in the XML
wiki
> > pages
> > >>> and to remove them. The fields are:
> > >>> * date
> > >>> * contentUpdateDate
> > >>> * creationDate
> > >>> * attachment/date
> > >>>
> > >>> See the PR
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/pull/44/
> > >>>
> > >>> This check (on both verify and format goals) is skippable entirely
> > with the
> > >>> "xar.dates.skip property" (default to false) or
> > >>> "xar.dates.skip.documentList" for individual documents
(list of doc
> > >>> references).
> > >>>
> > >>> I need your vote for accepting the existing PR and for removing
the
> > >>> document dates (e.g.
https://github.com/xwiki/
> xwiki-platform/pull/792)
> > and
> > >>> your feedback in case you know of any problems that this might
> create.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, please mention if you would prefer for this behavior to be
> > skipped by
> > >>> default (and explicitly enabled on XWiki Standard, so that 3rd
party
> > code
> > >>> is not impacted by this change).
> > >>>
> > >>> Here's my +1 (enabled by default and skippable if needed).
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Eduard
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>