23 Apr
2018
23 Apr
'18
12:18 p.m.
Hello everyone,
As you may already know, we have thought about replacing the l10n platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a good replacement choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/WeblateasXWikistranslationp…
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or directly in the design page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
24 Apr
24 Apr
3:44 p.m.
On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/
Also, I think that it has already been discussed, either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
As you may already know, we have thought about
replacing the l10n platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a good replacement choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/WeblateasXWikistranslationp…
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
WDYT ?
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or directly
in the design page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément
4:45 p.m.
Hi Clément,
Thanks for your feedback.
I think Weblate offers all the necessary features like git and github
integration, making PRs instead of directly pushing changes.
We should also be able to use xwiki.org as an identity provider using an
OAuth2 plugin.
If you see a missing feature that other tools have, we can consider them
for sure.
As for Python, why would it decrease maintainability and other what?
Thanks again,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Clément Aubin <aubincleme(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/
Also, I think that it has already been discussed, either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
As you may already know, we have thought about
replacing the l10n
platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a
good replacement
choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name
in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
WeblateasXWikistranslationplatform
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
WDYT ?
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or
directly in the design
page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément
25 Apr
25 Apr
10:47 a.m.
On 24 Apr 2018, at 15:44, Clément Aubin
<aubincleme(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
- You said "Weblate is able to run scripts after pulling changes from the git
repository and before committing changes.”. I don’t understand this sentence. You mean to
sync files that are located in our Git repos to weblate (git —> weblate)? When you say
“committing changes” you mean loading changes from git and inside weblate?
- You said "XML files with properties as content will be treated the same way as
above”. I couldn’t find what you meant by “same way as above”. Certainly you’ll need to
generate some properties file out of the XML file, no?
- Globally I find what you describe very complex and a bit hackish. Especially the part
about having some “.translation” directory which I assume you’ll want to commit in our git
repos?
- Isn’t it possible to add some new file format inside weblate instead so that it
understands properties inside XML files, etc.?
- Another idea: using weblate’s REST APIs to push/pull from weblate, using github web
hooks to perform conversions:
— when a change is pushed to a translation file in github, run a script to import it
inside weblate using weblate’s REST API
— when a change is done inside weblate and a PR is sent to our repos by weblate, run a
script to convert the content to the proper format and modify the PR accordingly
Even that sounds complex IMO. Being able to teach weblate about our format would seem the
simplest. If we could do this we could even send weblate a PR to support our format
natively.
You also need to handle deprecated keys, ability to rename/move a key and all its
translations, etc.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/
Also, I think that it has already been discussed, either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
As you may already know, we have thought about
replacing the l10n platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a good replacement choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/WeblateasXWikistranslationp…
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
WDYT ?
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or
directly in the design page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément
11:45 a.m.
Hi Vincent,
- What I mean by "pulling changes" is to update the git repository (e.g.
xwiki-platform) used by Weblate to find translations, and what I mean by
"committing changes" is to create a commit with the new translations made
by a user.
- When I wrote “same way as above”, I meant that the script should extract
the content of the XML file and then treat it like a regular Java
properties file (as it should in the previous case).
- The ".translation" directory doesn't have to (and shouldn't) be
committed
in the git repos.
- AFAICS, you can't simply add a new file format to weblate as it uses
another project for translations (
http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/translate-toolkit/en/latest/formats…)
and this tool also uses converters.
- About your other idea, this is exactly what the scripts are performing
but without using any API and using weblate's hooks.
- As for the other features, I don't think any of the suggested tools are
able to handle deprecated keys and renaming. We could just exclude the
deprecated section of the generated translations files so it doesn't appear
on Weblate.
I know that having to do what I described is a bit hackish but I think that
if we want to use a dedicated tool to deal with translations, we will have
to create a converter. You can find a list of converter used by the
translate toolkit here
: http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/translate-toolkit/en/latest/command…
<http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/translate-toolkit/en/latest/commands/index.html>
.
Thanks for your reply,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 24 Apr 2018, at 15:44, Clément Aubin
<aubincleme(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
platform
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/
Also, I think that it has already been discussed, either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
> As you may already know, we have thought about replacing the l10n > which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to
be a good replacement
choice,
> as it will able contributors to have their
name in the commits and it
has
> every features needed to make translations.
>
> One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
> translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
> XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
>
> A detailed solution can be found here :
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
WeblateasXWikistranslationplatform
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
- You said "Weblate is able to run scripts after pulling changes from the
git repository and before committing changes.”. I don’t understand this
sentence. You mean to sync files that are located in our Git repos to
weblate (git —> weblate)? When you say “committing changes” you mean
loading changes from git and inside weblate?
- You said "XML files with properties as content will be treated the same
way as above”. I couldn’t find what you meant by “same way as above”.
Certainly you’ll need to generate some properties file out of the XML file,
no?
- Globally I find what you describe very complex and a bit hackish.
Especially the part about having some “.translation” directory which I
assume you’ll want to commit in our git repos?
- Isn’t it possible to add some new file format inside weblate instead so
that it understands properties inside XML files, etc.?
- Another idea: using weblate’s REST APIs to push/pull from weblate, using
github web hooks to perform conversions:
— when a change is pushed to a translation file in github, run a script to
import it inside weblate using weblate’s REST API
— when a change is done inside weblate and a PR is sent to our repos by
weblate, run a script to convert the content to the proper format and
modify the PR accordingly
Even that sounds complex IMO. Being able to teach weblate about our format
would seem the simplest. If we could do this we could even send weblate a
PR to support our format natively.
You also need to handle deprecated keys, ability to rename/move a key and
all its translations, etc.
Thanks
-Vincent
WDYT ?
> Feel free to discuss it by responding here or directly in the design
page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément 
10:15 p.m.
On 04/24/2018 09:44 AM, Clément Aubin wrote:
On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
I've been quite happy with https://crowdin.com/ , which handles
ApplicationResources.properties very well, but isn't ideal for the .xml
translations. It's free for open source projects.
The problem with the .xml files is that apart from the translatable
content, which it handles well, it tries to commit the exact same XML
markup as in the "source" file, which doesn't really work for XWiki. As
a workaround, I just cat|sed the contents of the XML files and upload it
as a non-github-tracked resource. The alternative is to
rebase-interactive each pull request it creates to discard the commits
that try to re-format the XML files, but that gets tedious after a while.
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/ Also, I think that it has already been discussed,
either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
As you may already know, we have thought about
replacing the l10n platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a good replacement choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/WeblateasXWikistranslationp…
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
WDYT ?
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or
directly in the design page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément
26 Apr
26 Apr
10:21 a.m.
From what I remember https://crowdin.com/ quota for
OpenSource plan
was too low for XWiki.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
On 04/24/2018 09:44 AM, Clément Aubin wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
I've been quite happy with https://crowdin.com/ , which handles
ApplicationResources.properties very well, but isn't ideal for the .xml
translations. It's free for open source projects.
The problem with the .xml files is that apart from the translatable
content, which it handles well, it tries to commit the exact same XML
markup as in the "source" file, which doesn't really work for XWiki. As
a workaround, I just cat|sed the contents of the XML files and upload it
as a non-github-tracked resource. The alternative is to
rebase-interactive each pull request it creates to discard the commits
that try to re-format the XML files, but that gets tedious after a while.
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/ Also, I think that it has already been discussed,
either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu As you may already know, we have thought about
replacing the l10n platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a good replacement choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/WeblateasXWikistranslationp…
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
WDYT ?
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or
directly in the design page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément
30 Apr
30 Apr
10:31 a.m.
On 26 Apr 2018, at 10:21, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
From what I remember https://crowdin.com/ quota for OpenSource plan
was too low for XWiki.
I also prefer weblate which is more open source than crowdin (which I don’t know if you
can install locally and it’s a business and they could change their “opensource” plans at
any time so we'd need a way to install it locally).
Thanks
-Vincent
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
On 04/24/2018 09:44 AM, Clément Aubin wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne On 04/23/2018 12:18 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
I've been quite happy with https://crowdin.com/ , which handles
ApplicationResources.properties very well, but isn't ideal for the .xml
translations. It's free for open source projects.
The problem with the .xml files is that apart from the translatable
content, which it handles well, it tries to commit the exact same XML
markup as in the "source" file, which doesn't really work for XWiki. As
a workaround, I just cat|sed the contents of the XML files and upload it
as a non-github-tracked resource. The alternative is to
rebase-interactive each pull request it creates to discard the commits
that try to re-format the XML files, but that gets tedious after a while.
Hello everyone,
Hi,
AFAICS Weblate looks nice, but haven't we looked at other alternatives ?
Here are some of them :
* http://jabylon.org/ (uses Java, so it might be easier to integrate)
* http://zanata.org/
* http://pootle.translatehouse.org/
* https://pontoon.mozilla.org/ Also, I think that it has already been discussed,
either on
https://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=weblate or on IRC, but being able
to use xwiki.org as an identity provider on our translation platform
would be neat, so it could be something to look for in the possible
solutions.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu As you may already know, we have thought about
replacing the l10n platform
which is becoming too slow. Weblate seems to be a good replacement choice,
as it will able contributors to have their name in the commits and it has
every features needed to make translations.
One problem is that XWiki doesn't use a standard method to process
translation files. We can solve that by creating some scripts to convert
XWiki translation files into one that Weblate can understand.
A detailed solution can be found here :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/WeblateasXWikistranslationp…
We'll indeed need to convert our translation files to a more "standard"
format, but I fear that using Python might decrease the maintainability
of those scripts.
WDYT ?
Feel free to discuss it by responding here or
directly in the design page.
Thanks,
<http://www.xwiki.com/> *Adel Atallah*
*Product developer intern*
adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com <corina.luong(a)xwiki.com>
tel: +33 (0)6 12 96 35 06
Thanks,
Clément
2331
days inactive
2338
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Adel Atallah -
Clément Aubin -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol