+1
I had never agreed with that change, only with the removal of the syntax in
the default list of available syntax. By the way, do not forget to adapt
the comments in the configuration as well, to reintroduce the syntax there
(in comments only, of course).
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
+1
We have tons of if(syntax==xwiki/1.0), one less would be nice
especially when it's not that useful.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:52 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi devs,
Sergiu implemented
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8988 a while ago
and I
didn't agree with it (see my comment there).
I have 2 arguments:
1) Lots of code snippets on e.x.o are still in syntax 1.0 and if you
need to test
them you still need to be able to create pages in 1.0 syntax
2) We shouldn't hardcode anything and right
now we have hardcoded the
knowledge of the xwiki/1.0 syntax in
DocumentInformation.xml:
#foreach ($syntax in $availableParserSyntaxes)
#if ($configuredSyntaxes.contains($syntax.toIdString())
&&
!$syntax.toIdString().equalsIgnoreCase('xwiki/1.0'))
The important part for me is that the xwiki/1.0 syntax is NOT enabled by
default
in xwiki.cfg and thus users won't use it by mistake. Only those who
really need to use it would be able to use it.
I'd like to reinstate the ability to use xwiki/1.0 syntax in XWiki 5.x
by
removing the hardcoded check.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs