25 Oct
2012
25 Oct
'12
4:07 p.m.
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
* set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
--
Thomas Mortagne
25 Oct
25 Oct
4:28 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
* set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
+1
Thanks,
Marius
Here is my +1.
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:29 p.m.
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
* set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Big +1. Workspaces will be very happy when this becomes available :)
Thanks,
Eduard
Here is my +1.
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:43 p.m.
Hi,
On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module
I still haven't read it… I'm late sorry….
here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I'd prefer simply XWiki.TranslationClass (no need to mention document IMO since
they're all about documents).
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
Using syntax = plain/1.0 ;)
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand,
translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
+1
Thanks
-Vincent
4:47 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi,
On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
It was actually in case later we are able to put translation in an
object as mentioned by Jerome. This way we are safe.
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module
I still haven't read it… I'm late sorry….
here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I'd prefer simply XWiki.TranslationClass (no need to mention document IMO since
they're all about documents). * set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
Using syntax = plain/1.0 ;)
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand,
translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
+1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
6:12 p.m.
On 10/25/2012 04:47 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Note there is always the possibility to use "XWiki.TranslationSetClass"
or something like this later on for objects with translations (which is
also more correct, since there is not just one translation).
Jerome
Hi,
On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
It was actually in case later we are able to put translation in an
object as mentioned by Jerome. This way we are safe. Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module
I still haven't read it… I'm late sorry….
here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I'd prefer
simply XWiki.TranslationClass (no need to mention document IMO since they're all about
documents). * set the
"visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
Using syntax = plain/1.0 ;)
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand,
translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
+1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
6:07 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
6:11 p.m.
On Oct 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Well the wording we have now is "visibility". This is what we have for wiki
macros…
So if you want to change that I'm ok but we need to try to be consistent across the
board :)
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility". > As for the content of the document it will stay
the same as in
> preferences based documents for now.
>
> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Here is my +1.
26 Oct
26 Oct
3:03 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Oct 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Since I'm willing to remove this from wiki macros when they'll be wiki
components, the consistency issue would be temporary
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Well the wording we have now is "visibility". This is what we have for wiki
macros…
So if you want to change that I'm ok but we need to try to be consistent across the
board :) Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
> As for the content of the document it will
stay the same as in
> preferences based documents for now.
>
> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Here is my +1.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
3:06 p.m.
Hi
+1 for translation, would like to help in Hindi translations
-arvind
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
wiki macros…
On Oct 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
>> localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
>> dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
>>
>> Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
>> pair translations:
>> * put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
>
> I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
>
>> * set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current
wiki", "Current
user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
Well the wording we have now is "visibility". This is what we have for
So if you want to change that I'm ok but we need to try to be consistent
across the board :)
Since I'm willing to remove this from wiki macros when they'll be wiki
components, the consistency issue would be temporary
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> As for the content of the document it will
stay the same as in
> preferences based documents for now.
>
> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Here is my +1.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:17 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Arvind Gupta
<arvind.bernaulli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
+1 for translation, would like to help in Hindi translations
Not that you can already help translation XWiki on http://l10n.xwiki.org.
-arvind
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
wiki macros…
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Oct 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
>> localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
>> dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
>>
>> Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
>> pair translations:
>> * put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
>
> I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
>
>> * set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current
wiki", "Current
user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
Well the wording we have now is "visibility". This is what we have for
So if you want to change that I'm ok but we need to try to be consistent
across the board :)
Since I'm willing to remove this from wiki macros when they'll be wiki
components, the consistency issue would be temporary
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> As for the content of the document it will
stay the same as in
> preferences based documents for now.
>
> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Here is my +1.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
3:06 p.m.
+1
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
wiki macros…
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
On Oct 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
>> localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
>> dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
>>
>> Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
>> pair translations:
>> * put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
>
> I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
>
>> * set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current
wiki", "Current
user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
Well the wording we have now is "visibility". This is what we have for
So if you want to change that I'm ok but we need to try to be consistent
across the board :)
Since I'm willing to remove this from wiki macros when they'll be wiki
components, the consistency issue would be temporary
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> As for the content of the document it will
stay the same as in
> preferences based documents for now.
>
> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Here is my +1.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
29 Oct
29 Oct
5:33 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
OK for scope, I proposed "visibility" it to follow wiki macros but I
don't like it much either.
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9 Nov
9 Nov
11:53 a.m.
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean
<jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
I prefer "visibility" because it's easier to understand IMO.
"scope" is like saying "stuff".
But it's a detail… Again all I'd like is consistency which is now broken...
Thanks
-Vincent
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
OK for scope, I proposed "visibility" it to follow wiki macros but I
don't like it much either. Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility". >> As for the content of the document it will
stay the same as in
>> preferences based documents for now.
>>
>> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
>> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
12:36 p.m.
Even if it's a detail let me elaborate a bit :)
For me visibility implies that the "object" _is here_ but it is not
visible (my opinion might be biased because of the visibility CSS
property).
On the other side this definition sounds good to me: "In computer
programming, a scope is the context within a computer program in which
a variable name or other identifier is valid and can be used, or
within which a declaration has effect." [1]
The general definition fits too: "extent or range of view, outlook,
application, operation, effectiveness, etc.".
About the consistency issue, as I said I'm committed to make wiki
macros extend WikiComponents in the near future.
[1] : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_(programming)
[2] : http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/scope
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Jean-Vincent Drean,
XWiki.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent
Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
I prefer "visibility" because it's easier to understand IMO.
"scope" is like saying "stuff".
But it's a detail… Again all I'd like is consistency which is now broken...
Thanks
-Vincent
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
OK for scope, I proposed "visibility" it to follow wiki macros but I
don't like it much either. Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
* set the "visibility" field to
"Global", "Current wiki", "Current user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility". >> As for the content of the document it
will stay the same as in
>> preferences based documents for now.
>>
>> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
>> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10 Nov
10 Nov
1:16 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
I prefer "visibility" because it's easier to understand IMO.
"scope" is
like saying "stuff".
I don't agree with you, scope generally means "context" (when talking about
a software at least) which is exactly what we are talking about here a lot
more than visibility.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent
Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas
Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
>> localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
>> dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
>>
>> Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
>> pair translations:
>> * put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
>
> I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
>
>> * set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current
wiki", "Current
user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
OK for scope, I proposed "visibility" it to follow wiki macros but I
don't like it much either.
But it's a detail… Again all I'd like is consistency which is now broken...
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
>> As for the content of the document it
will stay the same as in
>> preferences based documents for now.
>>
>> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
>> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:36 p.m.
On Nov 10, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
You're proving my point :) "Context" has a lot of meanings and is very
fuzzy, especially for a user. It can mean anything...
Again we're not talking about the best terminology from a development point of view
here but for an end-user UI.
"visibility" is exactly how the user thinks about it: is my component going to
be visible in the farm, in the wiki, etc). He doesn't care how technically it's
done and whether there's an underlying notion of some context, etc.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
I prefer "visibility" because it's easier to understand IMO.
"scope" is
like saying "stuff".
I don't agree with you, scope generally means "context" (when talking
about
a software at least) which is exactly what we are talking about here a lot
more than visibility. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jean-Vincent
Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Thomas
Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
>> localization module here is a more detailed proposal for the
>> dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
>>
>> Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
>> pair translations:
>> * put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
>
> I would have preferred TranslationClass but I see your point.
>
>> * set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current
wiki", "Current
user"
WDYT about scope ? I'm implementing
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8234 and I went for scope there
because I think it's more than just "visibility".
OK for scope, I proposed "visibility" it to follow wiki macros but I
don't like it much either. But it's a
detail… Again all I'd like is consistency which is now broken...
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> As for the content of the document it
will stay the same as in
>> preferences based documents for now.
>>
>> I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
>> syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
26 Oct
26 Oct
2:48 p.m.
Hi Thomas,
On 10/25/2012 04:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module
Still haven't read it, I marked it as important.
here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
* set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
This is to preserve backwards compat, right?
Because I think it's important to be able to write an application which
can be installed in versions < 4.3 and not have to have 2 translation
documents.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
We should keep in mind backwards compat for these too.
Otherwise sounds correct to me, +1.
Thanks,
Anca
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
3:06 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Anca Luca <lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Thomas,
On 10/25/2012 04:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Not really, just don't have the time to design and vote a new syntax
so for the first version only the current syntax will be supported.
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module
Still haven't read it, I marked it as important.
here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
* set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
This is to preserve backwards compat, right? Because I think it's important to be able to write
an application which can
be installed in versions < 4.3 and not have to have 2 translation documents.
The idea if that you would have a field (or you would directly use the
document field I'm not sure yet) where you would indicate the syntax
of the translation message and it would default on the current one
when nothing is set. So there will be no backward compatibility issue.
I have other fields in mind for later (on demand, translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
We should keep in mind backwards compat for these too.
Otherwise sounds correct to me, +1.
Thanks,
Anca
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:39 p.m.
On 10/26/2012 03:06 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Anca Luca
<lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Yes, I understand, if it doesn't impact the format of the document
itself, it should be fine.
Thanks,
Anca
Hi Thomas,
On 10/25/2012 04:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Not really, just don't have the
time to design and vote a new syntax
so for the first version only the current syntax will be supported.
Hi devs,
Following the discussion about general architecture of the new
localization module
Still haven't read it, I marked it as important.
here is a more detailed proposal for the
dynamically registered wiki translations pages.
Here is how I propose to indicate that a document contains key=value
pair translations:
* put an object of class "XWiki.TranslationDocumentClass"
* set the "visibility" field to "Global", "Current wiki",
"Current user"
As for the content of the document it will stay the same as in
preferences based documents for now.
This is to preserve backwards compat, right? Because I think it's important to be able to
write an application which can
be installed in versions < 4.3 and not have to have 2 translation documents.
The idea if that you would have a field (or you would directly use the
document field I'm not sure yet) where you would indicate the syntax
of the translation message and it would default on the current one
when nothing is set. So there will be no backward compatibility issue. I have other fields in mind for later (on demand,
translation message
syntax, etc.) but this is a 4.3 proposal here.
We should keep in mind backwards compat for these too.
Otherwise sounds correct to me, +1.
Thanks,
Anca
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4378
days inactive
4394
days old
19 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Anca Luca -
Arvind Gupta -
Denis Gervalle -
Eduard Moraru -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Jerome Velociter -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol