19 May
2009
19 May
'09
1:45 p.m.
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
19 May
19 May
1:48 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Start migrating our XE XAR to 2.0 syntax for 1.9 final
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:45, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
2:04 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Start migrating our XE XAR to 2.0 syntax for 1.9 final
+1
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:45, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:11 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Start migrating our XE XAR to 2.0 syntax for 1.9 final
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:45, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki
Skype ID : wikibc
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full
2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Start migrating our XE XAR to 2.0 syntax for 1.9 final
+1,
JV.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:17 p.m.
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
+1 for having a full 2.0 set of pages for 2.0M1 (or at least 2.0M2).
+1 for having only 2.0 XARs.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
2:25 p.m.
+1
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:57 p.m.
+1
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we
need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the
manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605)
and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the
pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5652
days inactive
5652
days old
7 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Guillaume Lerouge -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Jerome Velociter -
lucien.pereira＠xwiki.com -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol