On 03/06/2010 02:53 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2010-03-06 02:23:19 +0100 (Sat, 06 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 27501
Modified:
platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/informationinline.vm
Log:
XWIKI-4980: Backlink information is not sorted by space
Fixed.
Modified: platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/informationinline.vm
===================================================================
--- platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/informationinline.vm 2010-03-06
01:20:42 UTC (rev 27500)
+++ platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/informationinline.vm 2010-03-06
01:23:19 UTC (rev 27501)
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
</dd>
#end
#end
- #set($blinks = $doc.getBacklinks())
Should getBackLinks use an "order by" clause at the database level?
I don't think any order is guaranteed at the moment in which case it would not be
breaking API.
Also getChildren could be changed at the same time since documents can have children in
other spaces.
Yes, I thought about this too, and I agree. But I chose the quickest and
safest approach for the moment.
> + #set($blinks =
$sorttool.sort($doc.getBacklinks()))
> #if($blinks.size()>0)
>
<dt>$msg.get('core.viewers.information.backlinks')</dt>
> <dd>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/