On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: Ok I see! And has anyone tried to hook the text renderer or at least chosen the URL? :) (?xpage=text) (?xpage=plaintext) or simply replace (?xpage=plain)

> On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:37 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: > >> Hello, >> I try to create a page in XWiki/2.0 generating some JSON data but I >> have >> some problems and I have to go back to XWiki/1.0... >> >> * when you write this in a page MySpace.MyPage: >> [ >> { "field" : "value" } >> ] >> >> you call MySpace.MyPage?xpage=plain and you get some HTML code: >> <p><br/>.{&nbsp;"field"&nbsp:&nbsp"value"...<br/></p> >> >> this is not good for the JSON parser... >> >> * So I try using the verbatim {{{}}} >> {{{ >> [ >> { "field" : "value" } >> ] >> }}} >> >> and I call again MySpace.MyPage?xpage=plain and I get: >> <pre> >> [ >> { "field" : "value" } >> ] >> </pre> >> >> Ok for the JSON data but the <pre></pre> is not good also for JSON >> parser... >> >> * If I write some velocity inside: >> {{velocity}} >> #doit() >> [ >> { "field" : "${value}" } >> ] >> {{/velocity} >> >> I get some <!-- velocity-macros --> comments or something like that >> before >> my json encoded into HTML... >> >> not good for the JSON parser also... >> >> What's the solution in XWiki/2.0 to make a page generate JSON? >> For the time being, I use XWiki/1.0 but this is not a viable >> solution. >> >> thanks >> Pascal

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt; wrote: It is quite strange to speak with someone quoting Jira :)

Ok Mr. Jira and do you confirm that nobody coded this part which routes the renderer to the plain text renderer when syntax is 2.0?

>>> On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:37 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> I try to create a page in XWiki/2.0 generating some JSON data >>>> but I >>>> have >>>> some problems and I have to go back to XWiki/1.0... >>>> >>>> * when you write this in a page MySpace.MyPage: >>>> [ >>>> { "field" : "value" } >>>> ] >>>> >>>> you call MySpace.MyPage?xpage=plain and you get some HTML code: >>>> <p><br/>.{&nbsp;"field"&nbsp:&nbsp"value"...<br/></p> >>>> >>>> this is not good for the JSON parser... >>>> >>>> * So I try using the verbatim {{{}}} >>>> {{{ >>>> [ >>>> { "field" : "value" } >>>> ] >>>> }}} >>>> >>>> and I call again MySpace.MyPage?xpage=plain and I get: >>>> <pre> >>>> [ >>>> { "field" : "value" } >>>> ] >>>> </pre> >>>> >>>> Ok for the JSON data but the <pre></pre> is not good also for JSON >>>> parser... >>>> >>>> * If I write some velocity inside: >>>> {{velocity}} >>>> #doit() >>>> [ >>>> { "field" : "${value}" } >>>> ] >>>> {{/velocity} >>>> >>>> I get some <!-- velocity-macros --> comments or something like >>>> that >>>> before >>>> my json encoded into HTML... >>>> >>>> not good for the JSON parser also... >>>> >>>> What's the solution in XWiki/2.0 to make a page generate JSON? >>>> For the time being, I use XWiki/1.0 but this is not a viable >>>> solution. >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> Pascal

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt; wrote: Really sorry about that but I'm also in a hurry looking at several things at the same time and I just thought I was still in JIRA without looking at the mail thread behind...For my (p)leasure, I will read it because it seems to answer my question... I can see that but this status doesn't mean that anybody has never tried to code it... but you're a bad guy making me a fool like that because you've just modified the JIRA in the meantime to add the mail thread in case anybody thought I was not silly enough :):):):)

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt; wrote: ok i give up, you are too strong :) I'm just a fool because I was searching in xwiki.org about it and not in the mails:)

Ok joking is enough :) When somebody knowing it will have time, it would be fine to put in a small page in xwiki.org the different options for xpage and the behavior between xwiki/1.0 and 2.0... might be useful... The same for the jsfx module (one can find some little info about jsx or ssx but not jsfx or the search engine doesn't index it well) This is not a critic because I know how difficult it is to keep doc alive... but for new modules like that, just a small page giving the role and the options would be useful...