23 Aug
2008
23 Aug
'08
4:33 p.m.
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on last
Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is thus
out of sync with the renderer. For example:
* Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
* Macros use 2 curly braces
* etc
We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need to
release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but
easy stuff like this should work).
Thanks
-Vincent
23 Aug
23 Aug
4:35 p.m.
Also I see you have a custom StringInputStream. What's the need vs
using a ByteArrayInputStream
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/ByteArrayInputStream.html)?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and
is thus out of sync with the renderer. For example:
* Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
* Macros use 2 curly braces
* etc
We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need
to release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work
but easy stuff like this should work).
Thanks
-Vincent
4:45 p.m.
Another comment:
There's now a XHTML cleaner interface and a first implementation
located in xwiki-xml. Could you please refactor the wysiwyg module to
use it so that we have only 1 cleaner? Also I don't think we need 2
cleaner implementations (jtidy + htmlcleaner).
Let us know what's missing so that we can add to it. The office GSOc
project is also starting to use it and it's going to add some cleaning
rules real soon so we should all work on it and make it the official
xwiki XHTML cleaner.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Also I see you have a custom StringInputStream.
What's the need vs
using a ByteArrayInputStream
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/ByteArrayInputStream.html)?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and
is thus out of sync with the renderer. For example:
* Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
* Macros use 2 curly braces
* etc
We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need
to release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work
but easy stuff like this should work).
Thanks
-Vincent
9:05 p.m.
Another comment:
There's now a XHTML cleaner interface and a first implementation
located in xwiki-xml. Could you please refactor the wysiwyg module to
use it so that we have only 1 cleaner? Also I don't think we need 2
cleaner implementations (jtidy + htmlcleaner).
Monday morning I'll do the refactoring and I'll drop JTidy.
Let us know what's missing so that we can add to it. The office GSOc
project is also starting to use it and it's going to add some cleaning
rules real soon so we should all work on it and make it the official
xwiki XHTML cleaner.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Also I see you have a custom StringInputStream.
What's the need vs
using a ByteArrayInputStream
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/ByteArrayInputStream.html)?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and
is thus out of sync with the renderer. For example:
* Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
* Macros use 2 curly braces
* etc
We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need
to release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work
but easy stuff like this should work).
Thanks
-Vincent
9:03 p.m.
Also I see you have a custom StringInputStream.
What's the need vs
using a ByteArrayInputStream
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/ByteArrayInputStream.html)?
That's not my code. Ludovic? It is used by the Radeox-based
XHTMLConverter. Since we're going to drop radeox, I had no incentive for
refactoring and cleaning that code. I kept it only to have a B-plan when
the new rendering didn't worked.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and
is thus out of sync with the renderer. For example:
* Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
* Macros use 2 curly braces
* etc
We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need
to release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work
but easy stuff like this should work).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
8:53 p.m.
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on last
Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is thus
out of sync with the renderer. For example:
The WYSIWYG editor doesn't use internally the XWiki syntax. It has HTML as
input and outputs also HTML. The conversion to and from XWiki syntax is
done here: http://tinyurl.com/5mwjq6 . So as long as
xwiki-core-rendering-1.6*.jar is in the class path it must be the latest
version of the renderer that it is used to make the conversion.
If you look at XWikiXHTMLConverter#fromXHTML method, the XWiki syntax is
not specified. I suspect it gets defaulted to version 1.0.
* Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
* Macros use 2 curly braces
* etc
We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need to
release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but
easy stuff like this should work).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9:22 p.m.
On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Ok then it means I was looking at code that uses the old rendering I
guess. Should we keep this code? Or did we all agree to drop it and
focus on the new rendering only? (I think that's what we agreed on).
If that's the case then we should clean the code and remove the
support for the old renderer I guess.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last
Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is thus
out of sync with the renderer. For example:
The WYSIWYG editor doesn't use internally the XWiki syntax. It has
HTML as
input and outputs also HTML. The conversion to and from XWiki syntax
is
done here: http://tinyurl.com/5mwjq6 . So as long as
xwiki-core-rendering-1.6*.jar is in the class path it must be the
latest
version of the renderer that it is used to make the conversion.
If you look at XWikiXHTMLConverter#fromXHTML method, the XWiki
syntax is
not specified. I suspect it gets defaulted to version 1.0.
> * Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
> * Macros use 2 curly braces
> * etc
>
> We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need to
> release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but
> easy stuff like this should work).
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
24 Aug
24 Aug
1:11 a.m.
On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Ok then it means I was looking at code that uses the old rendering I
guess. Should we keep this code? Or did we all agree to drop it and
focus on the new rendering only? (I think that's what we agreed on).
If that's the case then we should clean the code and remove the
support for the old renderer I guess.
WDYT?
Right. Monday morning the Radeox-based XHTMLConverter will be dropped. I
will also refactor my XxxImpl classes to DefaultXxx to meet the naming
conventions.
Thanks,
Marius
Hi
Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last
Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is thus
out of sync with the renderer. For example:
The WYSIWYG editor doesn't use internally the XWiki syntax. It has
HTML as
input and outputs also HTML. The conversion to and from XWiki syntax
is
done here: http://tinyurl.com/5mwjq6 . So as long as
xwiki-core-rendering-1.6*.jar is in the class path it must be the
latest
version of the renderer that it is used to make the conversion.
Thanks
-Vincent
If you look at XWikiXHTMLConverter#fromXHTML method, the XWiki
syntax is
not specified. I suspect it gets defaulted to version 1.0.
> * Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
> * Macros use 2 curly braces
> * etc
>
> We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need to
> release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but
> easy stuff like this should work).
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:12 a.m.
On Aug 24, 2008, at 1:11 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
BTW the build is not working for me after your commit of Friday. It
works if you build only the wysiwyg module but it doesn't work when
you build the whole platform for some reason. Haven't found why yet.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Ok then it means I was looking at code that uses the old rendering I
guess. Should we keep this code? Or did we all agree to drop it and
focus on the new rendering only? (I think that's what we agreed on).
If that's the case then we should clean the code and remove the
support for the old renderer I guess.
WDYT?
Right. Monday morning the Radeox-based XHTMLConverter will be
dropped. I
will also refactor my XxxImpl classes to DefaultXxx to meet the naming
conventions. Hi
Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last
Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is
thus
out of sync with the renderer. For example:
The WYSIWYG editor doesn't use internally the XWiki syntax. It has
HTML as
input and outputs also HTML. The conversion to and from XWiki syntax
is
done here: http://tinyurl.com/5mwjq6 . So as long as
xwiki-core-rendering-1.6*.jar is in the class path it must be the
latest
version of the renderer that it is used to make the conversion. >>
>> If you look at XWikiXHTMLConverter#fromXHTML method, the XWiki
>> syntax is
>> not specified. I suspect it gets defaulted to version 1.0.
>>
>>> * Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
>>> * Macros use 2 curly braces
>>> * etc
>>>
>>> We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we
>>> need to
>>> release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but
>>> easy stuff like this should work).
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
5917
days inactive
5918
days old
8 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Vincent Massol