6 Dec
2011
6 Dec
'11
4:07 p.m.
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if
they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert
all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
6 Dec
6 Dec
4:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
+1
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 17:07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in
that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see
outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep
using 2.0 if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving
2.0 available by default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it
shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users
wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:07 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
+1
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0
if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to
convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
5:29 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0
if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to
convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6:27 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's
currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using
it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle
since it was started
in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2
for the 4.x cycle (see
outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can
keep
using 2.0 if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax
starting in XE 3.4, leaving
2.0 available by default
* I believe there's no conversion issue
between 2.0 and 2.1 so it
shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on
extensions.xwiki.org for users
wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1
pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
7:35 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
+1
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 18:27, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
users
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's
currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using
it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle
since it was started
in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2
for the 4.x cycle (see
outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can
keep
using 2.0 if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax
starting in XE 3.4, leaving
2.0 available by default
* I believe there's no conversion issue
between 2.0 and 2.1 so it
shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch.
> * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1
pages
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
8:20 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
On 12/06/2011 10:07 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0
if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to
convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
+1.
Should we also convert all existing 2.0 documents to 2.1, directly by
replacing the document syntax in the sources? I'd say +1.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
8:24 p.m.
On Dec 6, 2011, at 8:20 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 12/06/2011 10:07 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
I'm fine with that too, it's a bit of work though (need to run conversion script
mentioned above, then export all pages and save them in SCM, verify they all work fine).
BTW we still have XWiki Syntax 1.0 documents in standard XE… ;) I'd be more in favor
of finishing their conversion for the 3.x cycle if we have some time. If we can do both
then great.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0
if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to
convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
+1.
Should we also convert all existing 2.0 documents to 2.1, directly by replacing the
document syntax in the sources? I'd say +1. 
10:36 p.m.
+1
Best regards,
Andreas Jonsson
2011-12-06 16:07, Vincent Massol skrev:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0
if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to
convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
7 Dec
7 Dec
4:05 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
+1
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in
that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see
outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep
using 2.0 if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving
2.0 available by default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it
shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users
wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6 Jan
6 Jan
6:47 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4 (SUMMARY)
The vote is passed with 9 +1, no 0, no -1.
I've just committed it.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently
experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale
========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0
* It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it
* It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle
* That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items
at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects
==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0
if they want
* We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by
default
* I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an
issue for users wanting to switch.
* We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to
convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
4637
days inactive
4668
days old
10 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Andreas Jonsson -
Denis Gervalle -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Sorin Burjan -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol