14 Sep
2012
14 Sep
'12
9:29 a.m.
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which forces
to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and 3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
Cast your votes!
Thanks
-Vincent
14 Sep
14 Sep
9:35 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
-1, Object is a pain to work with and Document has many possible
collisions too even if no java.lang in this case
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity,
ObjectDefinitionEntity
+1
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition
(or simply ObjectDefinition)
-1, It's inconsistent
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject,
XObjectDefinition
-1, "XWiki" as class name to indicate one wiki is very confusing
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which
forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and
3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
Cast your votes!
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
9:40 a.m.
Hi,
I'm not a big fan of ObjectDefinition.
I would vote 1) or 3) with XObject and XClass.
Jerome
________________________________________
From: devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org [devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org] on behalf of Vincent Massol
[vincent(a)massol.net]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:29 AM
To: XWiki Developers
Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Name for Entity classes in the new model
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which forces
to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and 3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
Cast your votes!
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:05 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:40 AM, jerome(a)velociter.fr <jerome(a)velociter.fr>wrote;wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a big fan of ObjectDefinition.
I follow up on this, I do not really see the benefit of it, and I really
dislike the idea to have this one in two words, while all others are single.
I would vote 1) or 3) with XObject and XClass.
but I do not like the inconsistency of the above choice, about the X, as
Vincent mentioned.
So I would be more in favor of:
XWikiEntity, XSpaceEntity, XDocumentEntity, XObjectEntity and XClassEntity
while for references we would need to have:
XWikiReference, XSpaceReference, XDocumentReference, XObjectReference and
XClassReference
Having a single X prefixed word for all of them, will favor other
combination in the code, where the initial prefix is that single XWord. It
could also favor clear suffixes as well, in methods when needed. It could
also help in case of future expansion. It allow to be very consistent.
Jerome
________________________________________
From: devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org [devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org] on behalf of
Vincent Massol [vincent(a)massol.net]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:29 AM
To: XWiki Developers
Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Name for Entity classes in the new model
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space,
document, object, object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply
ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object
which forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put
proposals 2) and 3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject
which is not present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can
clash with the DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit
longer.
Cast your votes!
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
10:11 a.m.
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:40 AM, jerome(a)velociter.fr
<jerome(a)velociter.fr>wrote;wrote:
You do realize that this would mean deprecating all EntityReference classes we've
introduced not long ago + all APIs that are using them (there are a few hundreds of them)?
:)
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi,
I'm not a big fan of ObjectDefinition.
I follow up on this, I do not really see the benefit of it, and I really
dislike the idea to have this one in two words, while all others are single.
I would vote 1) or 3) with XObject and XClass.
but I do not like the inconsistency of the above choice, about the X, as
Vincent mentioned.
So I would be more in favor of:
XWikiEntity, XSpaceEntity, XDocumentEntity, XObjectEntity and XClassEntity
while for references we would need to have:
XWikiReference, XSpaceReference, XDocumentReference, XObjectReference and
XClassReference Having a single X prefixed word for all of them, will
favor other
combination in the code, where the initial prefix is that single XWord. It
could also favor clear suffixes as well, in methods when needed. It could
also help in case of future expansion. It allow to be very consistent.
>
> Jerome
> ________________________________________
> From: devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org [devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org] on behalf of
> Vincent Massol [vincent(a)massol.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:29 AM
> To: XWiki Developers
> Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Name for Entity classes in the new model
>
> Hi devs,
>
> As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
>
> We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space,
> document, object, object definition, etc).
>
> We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
>
> 1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
> 2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
> 3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply
> ObjectDefinition)
> 4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
> 5) Some other name for objects.
>
> Some concerns:
> * Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object
> which forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put
> proposals 2) and 3)
> * In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject
> which is not present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
> * In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can
> clash with the DOM Document object
>
> My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit
> longer.
>
> Cast your votes!
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
10:36 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
single.
XClassEntity
It will not be really fun, but if you want to stick with existing
reference, than our best choice would be:
WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectEntity and ClassEntity
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:40 AM,
jerome(a)velociter.fr <
jerome(a)velociter.fr>wroteote:
Hi,
I'm not a big fan of ObjectDefinition.
I follow up on this, I do not really see the benefit of it, and I really
dislike the idea to have this one in two words, while all others are
I would vote 1) or 3) with XObject and XClass.
but I do not like the inconsistency of the above choice, about the X, as
Vincent mentioned.
So I would be more in favor of:
XWikiEntity, XSpaceEntity, XDocumentEntity, XObjectEntity and
while for references we would need to have:
XWikiReference, XSpaceReference, XDocumentReference, XObjectReference and
XClassReference
You do realize that this would mean deprecating all EntityReference
classes we've introduced not long ago + all APIs that are using them (there
are a few hundreds of them)? :)
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Having a single X prefixed word for all of them,
will favor other
combination in the code, where the initial prefix is that single XWord.
It
could also favor clear suffixes as well, in
methods when needed. It could
also help in case of future expansion. It allow to be very consistent.
>
> Jerome
> ________________________________________
> From: devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org [devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org] on behalf of
> Vincent Massol [vincent(a)massol.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:29 AM
> To: XWiki Developers
> Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Name for Entity classes in the new model
>
> Hi devs,
>
> As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
>
> We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space,
> document, object, object definition, etc).
>
> We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
>
> 1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
> 2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
> 3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply
> ObjectDefinition)
> 4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
> 5) Some other name for objects.
>
> Some concerns:
> * Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's
java.lang.Object
> which forces to use the FQN name when coding
in Java. Which is why I've
put
> proposals 2) and 3)
> * In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject
> which is not present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
> * In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document
can
> clash with the DOM Document object
>
> My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit
> longer.
>
> Cast your votes!
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:59 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
I've
bit
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
as
and
(there
+1. The other options don`t sound right to me.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
really
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:40 AM,
jerome(a)velociter.fr <
jerome(a)velociter.fr>wroteote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not a big fan of ObjectDefinition.
>>
>
> I follow up on this, I do not really see the benefit of it, and I dislike
the idea to have this one in two words, while all others are
single.
>
>
>>
>> I would vote 1) or 3) with XObject and XClass.
>>
>
> but I do not like the inconsistency of the above choice, about the X, Vincent
mentioned.
So I would be more in favor of:
XWikiEntity, XSpaceEntity, XDocumentEntity, XObjectEntity and
XClassEntity
>
> while for references we would need to have:
>
> XWikiReference, XSpaceReference, XDocumentReference, XObjectReference
XClassReference
You do realize that this would mean deprecating all EntityReference
classes we've introduced not long ago + all APIs that are using them are a few hundreds of them)? :)
It will not be really fun, but if you want to stick with existing
reference, than our best choice would be:
WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectEntity and ClassEntity
Thanks
-Vincent
could
Having a single X prefixed word for all of them,
will favor other
combination in the code, where the initial prefix is that single XWord.
It
> could also favor clear suffixes as well, in methods when needed. It also help
in case of future expansion. It allow to be very consistent.
>
> Jerome
> ________________________________________
> From: devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org [devs-bounces(a)xwiki.org] on behalf of
> Vincent Massol [vincent(a)massol.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:29 AM
> To: XWiki Developers
> Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Name for Entity classes in the new model
>
> Hi devs,
>
> As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
>
> We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space,
> document, object, object definition, etc).
>
> We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
>
> 1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
> 2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
> 3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply
> ObjectDefinition)
> 4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
> 5) Some other name for objects.
>
> Some concerns:
> * Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's
java.lang.Object
>> which forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why put
>> proposals 2) and 3)
>> * In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in
XObject
>> which is not present in the other entity
names, hence proposal 4 and
2)
> * In
proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document
can
>> clash with the DOM Document object
>>
>> My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a >
longer.
>
> Cast your votes!
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:06 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which
forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and
3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
Cast your votes!
+0.5 for 2) (maybe with ClassEntity as suggested by Denis). I don't
like the rest.
Thanks,
Marius
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:15 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which
forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and
3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
In the list above my preferences goes to 2) but we've been using the
term Class for years and I'm afraid we'd be mixing
ObjectDefinition/Class everywhere. It seems safer to me, even if it's
not perfect for the reasons mentioned in the thread, to go for:
WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectEntity, ClassEntity
JV.
20 Sep
20 Sep
1:55 p.m.
Hello devs,
Why not XWikiWiki, XWikiSpace, XWikiDocument, XWikiObject and XWikiClass ?
In this case "XWiki" is not merely a prefix, it's really a description
of what the class represents : XWikiDocument is the concept of an
XWiki Document, and not just something related to XWiki. Or using "XW"
to shorten instead of "X" would avoid confusion between "XWiki" and
"Wiki prefixed by 'X' ".
Not really "at ease" to contribute to this pure dev topic, but I
couldn't resist ;-)
Br,
Jeremie
2012/9/14 Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which
forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and
3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
In the list above my preferences goes to 2) but we've been using the
term Class for years and I'm afraid we'd be mixing
ObjectDefinition/Class everywhere. It seems safer to me, even if it's
not perfect for the reasons mentioned in the thread, to go for:
WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectEntity, ClassEntity
JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5 Mar
5 Mar
12:49 p.m.
Just to let you know I've done the rename on the feature-newmodel branch.
@Jeremie, sorry, everyone had agreed on the *Entity syntax, but thanks for your proposal
:)
Personally I didn't like the XWiki* proposal because everything is about XWiki so for
consistency it would mean we would name all our classes with the XWiki prefix and this is
redundant…
The Entity suffix is better because it tells what it is about:
* WikiReference is a reference
* WikiEntity is an entity
Thanks
-Vincent
On Sep 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello devs,
Why not XWikiWiki, XWikiSpace, XWikiDocument, XWikiObject and XWikiClass ?
In this case "XWiki" is not merely a prefix, it's really a description
of what the class represents : XWikiDocument is the concept of an
XWiki Document, and not just something related to XWiki. Or using "XW"
to shorten instead of "X" would avoid confusion between "XWiki" and
"Wiki prefixed by 'X' ".
Not really "at ease" to contribute to this pure dev topic, but I
couldn't resist ;-)
Br,
Jeremie
2012/9/14 Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi devs,
As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space, document, object,
object definition, etc).
We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply ObjectDefinition)
4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject, XObjectDefinition
5) Some other name for objects.
Some concerns:
* Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's java.lang.Object which
forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java. Which is why I've put proposals 2) and
3)
* In proposal 3) there's a bit of an inconsistency with the X in XObject which is not
present in the other entity names, hence proposal 4 and 2)
* In proposal 1) there can be some other clashes. For example Document can clash with the
DOM Document object
My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a bit longer.
In the list above my preferences goes to 2) but we've been using the
term Class for years and I'm afraid we'd be mixing
ObjectDefinition/Class everywhere. It seems safer to me, even if it's
not perfect for the reasons mentioned in the thread, to go for:
WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectEntity, ClassEntity
JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:52 p.m.
2013/3/5 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
Just to let you know I've done the rename on the
feature-newmodel branch.
@Jeremie, sorry, everyone had agreed on the *Entity syntax, but thanks for
your proposal :)
No problem of course :)
Personally I didn't like the XWiki* proposal because everything is about
XWiki so for consistency it would mean we would name
all our classes with
the XWiki prefix and this is redundant…
The Entity suffix is better because it tells what it is about:
* WikiReference is a reference
* WikiEntity is an entity
Thanks
-Vincent
On Sep 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
In the list above my preferences goes to 2) but we've been using the
term Class for years and I'm afraid we'd be mixing
ObjectDefinition/Class everywhere. It seems safer to me, even if it's
not perfect for the reasons mentioned in the thread, to go for:
WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectEntity, ClassEntity
JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hello devs,
Why not XWikiWiki, XWikiSpace, XWikiDocument, XWikiObject and XWikiClass
?
In this case "XWiki" is not merely a prefix, it's really a description
of what the class represents : XWikiDocument is the concept of an
XWiki Document, and not just something related to XWiki. Or using "XW"
to shorten instead of "X" would avoid confusion between "XWiki" and
"Wiki prefixed by 'X' ".
Not really "at ease" to contribute to this pure dev topic, but I
couldn't resist ;-)
Br,
Jeremie
2012/9/14 Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com>om>:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> As you may have seen, I've been working on the new model in a branch.
>>
>> We need to decide on the naming of the Entity classes (wiki, space,
document, object, object definition, etc).
>>
>> We have several possibilities I know of for naming them:
>>
>> 1) Wiki, Space, Document, Object, ObjectDefinition
>> 2) WikiEntity, SpaceEntity, DocumentEntity, ObjectDefinitionEntity
>> 3) Wiki, Space, Document, XObject, XObjectDefinition (or simply
ObjectDefinition)
>> 4) XWiki, XSpace, XDocument, XObject,
XObjectDefinition
>> 5) Some other name for objects.
>>
>> Some concerns:
>> * Using Object as in 1) is a bit of a pain since there's
java.lang.Object which forces to use the FQN name when coding in Java.
Which is why I've put proposals 2) and 3)
>> * In proposal 3) there's a bit of an
inconsistency with the X in
XObject which is not present in the other entity names,
hence proposal 4
and 2)
>> * In proposal 1) there can be some other
clashes. For example Document
can clash with the DOM Document object
>>
>> My personal vote goes to 2), even though it makes the entity names a
bit
longer.
4205
days inactive
4377
days old
11 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Denis Gervalle -
Eduard Moraru -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Jeremie BOUSQUET -
jerome＠velociter.fr -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol