24 Jun
2010
24 Jun
'10
11:14 a.m.
Hi,
I've started thinking with Thomas about the new front end architecture and here's
our current idea (without details) for the future:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
If you have ideas about this please send them.
This message is there so that we can share a common vision for the future.
Thanks
-Vincent
25 Jun
25 Jun
10:05 a.m.
Do we want to continue with templates in the filesystem rather than having everything in
the database?
If so, will there be a pseudo document so that the templates don't execute in the
security context of whatever document is being viewed?
I don't see anything about overlays (or skin extensions) and that seems to be
related.
Caleb
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
I've started thinking with Thomas about the new front end architecture and here's
our current idea (without details) for the future:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
If you have ideas about this please send them.
This message is there so that we can share a common vision for the future.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:06 a.m.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
Do we want to continue with templates in the
filesystem rather than having everything in the database?
Wherever templates are, it doesn't change this high level architecture IMO.
Note that the point of templates is to make xwiki work even when the database is empty...
If so, will there be a pseudo document so that the
templates don't execute in the security context of whatever document is being viewed?
I don't see anything about overlays (or skin extensions) and that seems to be
related.
This is a high level architecture. I haven't mentioned the xwiki-skin module and a few
more (xwiki-url , etc).
Before entering into details, I'd like to make sure we agree about this high level
architecture and more specifically to have these 2 modules:
- xwiki-template
- xwiki-displayer
Thanks
-Vincent
Caleb
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started thinking with Thomas about the new front end architecture and
here's our current idea (without details) for the future:
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
>
> If you have ideas about this please send them.
>
> This message is there so that we can share a common vision for the future.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
10:30 a.m.
Vincent Massol wrote:
The names sound great and the flow chart looks nice. What will they do? get the document
and render it?
What will the interface look like? Also will seperating Template from Displayer interfere
with the ability of
a script in a document to manipulate the template XDOM around it?
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Caleb James DeLisle
wrote:
I
see, I noticed "vm file" in the flow chart and jumped to a conclusion.
Do we want to continue with templates in the
filesystem rather than having everything in the database?
Wherever templates are, it doesn't change this high level architecture IMO.
Note that the point of templates is to make xwiki work even when the database is empty...
IMO there should be enough filesystem templates to help the user set up a database and
install an xar.
That is a detail as you said.
If so, will there be a pseudo document so that
the templates don't execute in the security context of whatever document is being
viewed?
I don't see anything about overlays (or skin extensions) and that seems to be
related.
This is a high level architecture. I haven't mentioned the xwiki-skin module and a
few more (xwiki-url , etc).
Before entering into details, I'd like to make sure we agree about this high level
architecture and more specifically to have these 2 modules:
- xwiki-template
- xwiki-displayer
Thanks
-Vincent
Caleb
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started thinking with Thomas about the new front end architecture and
here's our current idea (without details) for the future:
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
>
> If you have ideas about this please send them.
>
> This message is there so that we can share a common vision for the future.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:34 a.m.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:30, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
Do you means that there will be no more common template between wikis in a
farm. FS template have some advantage over an everything in the database
solution, one is to have them shared across wikis. The old Application
manager have some feature to share document between wikis, but I am
currently not confident with it. If you want an everything in the database
solution, we should at least improve that for XEM.
Denis
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Caleb James DeLisle
wrote:
> Do we want to continue with templates in the filesystem rather than
having
everything in the database?
Wherever templates are, it doesn't change this high level architecture
IMO.
I see, I noticed "vm file" in the flow chart and jumped to a conclusion.
Note that the point of templates is to make xwiki work even when the
database is
empty...
IMO there should be enough filesystem templates to help the user set up a
database and install an xar.
That is a detail as you said.
> If so, will there be a pseudo document so that the templates don't
execute
in the security context of whatever document is being viewed?
> I don't see anything about overlays (or
skin extensions) and that seems
to be related.
This is a high level architecture. I haven't mentioned the xwiki-skin
module
and a few more (xwiki-url , etc).
Before entering into details, I'd like to make sure we agree about this
high
level architecture and more specifically to have these 2 modules:
- xwiki-template
- xwiki-displayer
The names sound great and the flow chart looks nice. What will they do? get
the document and render it?
What will the interface look like? Also will seperating Template from
Displayer interfere with the ability of
a script in a document to manipulate the template XDOM around it?
Thanks
-Vincent
> Caleb
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've started thinking with Thomas about the new front end architecture
and here's our current idea (without details) for the future:
>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
>>
>> If you have ideas about this please send them.
>>
>> This message is there so that we can share a common vision for the
future.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:37 p.m.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
The names sound great and the flow chart looks nice. What will they do? get the document
and render it?
What will the interface look like? Also will seperating Template from Displayer interfere
with the ability of
a script in a document to manipulate the template XDOM around it?
I've added some more ideas on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
Thanks
-Vincent
Vincent Massol wrote:
Yes the file part should be removed. We don't have to make assumption about where
it's stored.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Caleb James DeLisle
wrote:
I
see, I noticed "vm file" in the flow chart and jumped to a conclusion. Do we want to continue with templates in the
filesystem rather than having everything in the database?
Wherever templates are, it doesn't change this high level architecture IMO. Note that the
point of templates is to make xwiki work even when the database is empty...
IMO there should be enough filesystem templates to help the user set up a database and
install an xar.
That is a detail as you said.
If so, will there be a pseudo document so that
the templates don't execute in the security context of whatever document is being
viewed?
I don't see anything about overlays (or skin extensions) and that seems to be
related.
This is a high level architecture. I haven't mentioned the xwiki-skin module and a
few more (xwiki-url , etc).
Before entering into details, I'd like to make sure we agree about this high level
architecture and more specifically to have these 2 modules:
- xwiki-template
- xwiki-displayer > Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Caleb
>>
>> Vincent Massol wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've started thinking with Thomas about the new front end architecture
and here's our current idea (without details) for the future:
>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
>>>
>>> If you have ideas about this please send them.
>>>
>>> This message is there so that we can share a common vision for the future.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
5197
days inactive
5198
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Vincent Massol