If we don't increase version then how is it going to appear in the history view. Namely, how would you see that a comment has been added? Of course we would still need to send notifications even when comments are added. This is a general question about objects attached to a document. As of now I'm not sure we should treat some objects differently than others. Just to step back and play the devil, why is it bad that document version is increased when comments are added? Thanks -Vincent On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Hi, > > This is more a matter of opinions. Should a comment increase the > version of a document? I'd say yes, but the view of simple users is > that a comment should not affect the document, as it is something > describing the document, not belonging to the document. So we should > have a parameter that configures this. > > WDYT? > Sergiu > -- > http://purl.org/net/sergiu >