. It's getting this one out on both my blog
and vincent's
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.xpn.xwiki.XWiki.formatDate(XWiki.java:5143)
at com.xpn.xwiki.XWiki.formatDate(XWiki.java:5148)
at com.xpn.xwiki.api.XWiki.formatDate(XWiki.java:1846)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor201.invoke(Unknown S
Vincent Massol a écrit :
On Jan 21, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
+1 +1 +1 +1
I like that:
If you have a reference that is an array, you can now call
fixed-length list methods on it. (e.g. $array.size() and
$array.get($index) )
And this could make our dream come true:
The underlying Velocimacro code has been refactored to allow:
Much, much better performance than Velocity 1.5
This could be cool also (we need to set a property for it.. I would
say
100 or 200)
users to configure a velocimacro.max.depth property (to limit
recursion et al)
That's nice too:
There is now an automatic $velocityHasNext reference in #foreach loops
Is it working without changes ?
I think so. Just committed it. Now need to see how the functional
tests work (but unfortunately our tests are broken right now). I'll
revert it if there's a big problem but it looks ok so far.
Can we try it right now on
myxwiki.org ?
Yep. Just replace velocity engine with the 1.6.1 version and the
velocity tools with 1.4 if you don't want to use a new build. Make
sure you update that page at the end to explain the change (we must
all log what we do on that page):
http://myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/Upgrading
Thanks
-Vincent
Ludovic
Vincent Massol a écrit :
> Hi devs,
>
> Under Anca's pressure (joking :)) here's a vote to upgrade our
> velocity deps.
>
> Reasons:
> * There are some features listed below we want to benefit from
> in the near future
> * We have some lock issue with some velocity code in Velocity 1.5
> on
myxwiki.org and we hope (dream?) that the upgrade could fix
> them...
>
> For details see
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3142
>
> Note that the build works fine and the selenium tests seem ok
> (although some tests are failing but some - all? - were also failing
> before - this is bad btw since we can't trust our build, we need to
> fix that).
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
http://xwiki.com
>
http://xwiki.org
>
http://massol.net
>
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs