29 Apr
2011
29 Apr
'11
4:56 p.m.
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use
the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict
with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT
2. stable-3.0
3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT
4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and
easy to remember
-1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me
1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and
would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories
+0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
--
Thomas Mortagne
29 Apr
29 Apr
6:03 p.m.
On 04/29/2011 04:56 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use
the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict
with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT
2. stable-3.0
3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT
4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and
easy to remember
-1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me
1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and
would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories
+0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
Same votes as you.
As a minor alternative, "stable-3.0.x" (we could also change the naming
strategy and release 3.1.0 instead of 3.1)
FYI, Linux uses "linux-2.6.37.y".
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
17 May
17 May
4:45 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] Choose a name for stable branches in git repositories
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 18:03, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 04/29/2011 04:56 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Lets assume no other answer mean +0, renaming to stable-3.0.x now
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use
the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict
with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT
2. stable-3.0
3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT
4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and
easy to remember
-1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me
1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and
would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories
+0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
Same votes as you.
As a minor alternative, "stable-3.0.x" (we could also change the naming
strategy and release 3.1.0 instead of 3.1)
FYI, Linux uses "linux-2.6.37.y".
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:57 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] Choose a name for stable branches in git repositories
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:56 +0200, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use
the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict
with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
My vote goes for 1/ (that would be the same as the artifact id for the
branch snaps, right?)
don't we need more of these, btw? for each repo? (platform and
enterprise) or we can have same branch name on different repos?
Thanks,
Anca
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT
2. stable-3.0
3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT
4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and
easy to remember
-1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me
1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and
would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories
+0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
5:04 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] Choose a name for stable branches in git repositories
On May 17, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Luca Anca wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:56 +0200, Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
me too (at least until we get an agreement about our git dev process for branches).
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use
the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict
with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
My vote goes for 1/ (that would be the same as the artifact id for the
branch snaps, right?) don't we need more of these, btw? for each repo?
(platform and
enterprise) or we can have same branch name on different repos?
Thanks,
Anca
>
> 1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT
> 2. stable-3.0
> 3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT
> 4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
>
> WDYT ?
>
> +1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and
> easy to remember
> -1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me
> 1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and
> would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories
> +0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
4871
days inactive
4889
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Luca Anca -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol