6 May
2010
6 May
'10
2:33 p.m.
Hi devs,
Currently the number of rows displayed in a livetable is fixed at creation
time.
I proposed to add UI controls (currently select) that allows to change the
pagination size freely by the end user.
This patch is be both a change in livetable.js to support these controls
(one or more), and a change in the livetable macro to allow displaying them.
I have already a patch and some screenshots as well as bare documentation,
you can review them all at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer
I am currently testing different browsers to ensure there is no regression.
WDYT ?
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
6 May
6 May
2:55 p.m.
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:33, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
Hi devs,
Currently the number of rows displayed in a livetable is fixed at creation
time.
I proposed to add UI controls (currently select) that allows to change the
pagination size freely by the end user.
This patch is be both a change in livetable.js to support these controls
(one or more), and a change in the livetable macro to allow displaying
them.
I have already a patch and some screenshots as well as bare documentation,
you can review them all at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer
I am currently testing different browsers to ensure there is no regression.
WDYT ?
Sounds very nice to me, I was asked about it in the past so I'm +1.
Only question -> is the preference remembered for the user? I guess not and
that the default still is the number chose by the livetable creator, but
thought I'd ask.
Guillaume
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
3:05 p.m.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:55, Guillaume Lerouge <guillaume(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:33, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
Well this is mainly a new functionality on the livetable, no change in XE in
my patch currently. My feeling is that keeping the information for the user
should not be done by the livetable itself (JS), but by the caller (the
macro, why not). It would not be so difficult to do with cookies, it would
be a little bit more work to store the information in the user profile.
Anyway, this is a second step.
By the way, I have not proposed to change the current pages of XE, but it
could be a nice idea. Do not hesitate to propose page you want me to
improve. The other way, we may also set this new feature as a default, so it
will apear on all existing livetables using the macro, and allow disabling
it. WDYT ?
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi devs,
Currently the number of rows displayed in a livetable is fixed at
creation
time.
I proposed to add UI controls (currently select) that allows to change
the
pagination size freely by the end user.
This patch is be both a change in livetable.js to support these controls
(one or more), and a change in the livetable macro to allow displaying
them.
I have already a patch and some screenshots as well as bare
documentation,
you can review them all at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer
I am currently testing different browsers to ensure there is no
regression.
WDYT ?
Sounds very nice to me, I was asked about it in the past so I'm +1.
Only question -> is the preference remembered for the user? I guess not and
that the default still is the number chose by the livetable creator, but
thought I'd ask.
3:10 p.m.
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 15:05, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:55, Guillaume Lerouge
<guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer
and
Yes, I'd make this available by default to all livetables, with a
configuration parameter allowing to disable it on a case-by-case basis.
Guillaume
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:33, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
controls
Hi devs,
Currently the number of rows displayed in a livetable is fixed at
creation
time.
I proposed to add UI controls (currently select) that allows to change
the
> pagination size freely by the end user.
>
> This patch is be both a change in livetable.js to support these (one or
more), and a change in the livetable macro to allow displaying
them.
I have already a patch and some screenshots as well as bare
documentation,
you can review them all at
I am currently testing different browsers to ensure there is no
regression.
WDYT ?
Sounds very nice to me, I was asked about it in the past so I'm +1.
Only question -> is the preference remembered for the user? I guess not that the default still is the number chose by the
livetable creator, but
thought I'd ask.
Well this is mainly a new functionality on the livetable, no change in XE
in
my patch currently. My feeling is that keeping the information for the user
should not be done by the livetable itself (JS), but by the caller (the
macro, why not). It would not be so difficult to do with cookies, it would
be a little bit more work to store the information in the user profile.
Anyway, this is a second step.
By the way, I have not proposed to change the current pages of XE, but it
could be a nice idea. Do not hesitate to propose page you want me to
improve. The other way, we may also set this new feature as a default, so
it
will apear on all existing livetables using the macro, and allow disabling
it. WDYT ?
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
3:43 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Support choosing pagination size in livetable UI
Hi Denis,
It's pretty nice.
I've added an annotation on the patch
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer…
The annotation dropped the end of my selection, it actually concerns the following lines
:
+ #if($!hasPageSize)
+ document.observe("xwiki:livetable:${divid}:loadingEntries", function() {
$('${divid}-pagesize').addClassName("hidden"); } );
+ document.observe("xwiki:livetable:${divid}:loadingComplete", function() {
$('${divid}-pagesize').removeClassName("hidden"); } );
+ #end
Jerome.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guillaume Lerouge" <guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
To: "XWiki Developers" <devs(a)xwiki.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:10:01 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome /
Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Support choosing pagination size in livetable UI
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 15:05, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:55, Guillaume Lerouge
<guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer
and
Yes, I'd make this available by default to all livetables, with a
configuration parameter allowing to disable it on a case-by-case basis.
Guillaume
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:33, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
controls
Hi devs,
Currently the number of rows displayed in a livetable is fixed at
creation
time.
I proposed to add UI controls (currently select) that allows to change
the
> pagination size freely by the end user.
>
> This patch is be both a change in livetable.js to support these (one or
more), and a change in the livetable macro to allow displaying
them.
I have already a patch and some screenshots as well as bare
documentation,
you can review them all at
I am currently testing different browsers to ensure there is no
regression.
WDYT ?
Sounds very nice to me, I was asked about it in the past so I'm +1.
Only question -> is the preference remembered for the user? I guess not that the default still is the number chose by the
livetable creator, but
thought I'd ask.
Well this is mainly a new functionality on the livetable, no change in XE
in
my patch currently. My feeling is that keeping the information for the user
should not be done by the livetable itself (JS), but by the caller (the
macro, why not). It would not be so difficult to do with cookies, it would
be a little bit more work to store the information in the user profile.
Anyway, this is a second step.
By the way, I have not proposed to change the current pages of XE, but it
could be a nice idea. Do not hesitate to propose page you want me to
improve. The other way, we may also set this new feature as a default, so
it
will apear on all existing livetables using the macro, and allow disabling
it. WDYT ?
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:56 p.m.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 15:43, Jerome Velociter <jerome(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi Denis,
It's pretty nice.
I've added an annotation on the patch
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer…
The annotation dropped the end of my selection, it actually concerns the
following lines :
+ #if($!hasPageSize)
+ document.observe("xwiki:livetable:${divid}:loadingEntries", function()
{ $('${divid}-pagesize').addClassName("hidden"); } );
+ document.observe("xwiki:livetable:${divid}:loadingComplete",
function() { $('${divid}-pagesize').removeClassName("hidden"); } );
+ #end
Well, I do not follow. The JS is able to display one or more control,
anywhere you want. Choosing to put only one, and in the same place then the
loading bar is just a design choice, that is the responsability of the code
that produce the markup (the macro here). And the behavior of hiding the
control is related. This is why I choose to add a additional even to the
table, and put the observe in the macro.
Denis
Jerome.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guillaume Lerouge" <guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
To: "XWiki Developers" <devs(a)xwiki.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:10:01 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern
/ Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Support choosing pagination size in
livetable UI
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 15:05, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
displaying
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/LivetablePageSizer
and
> that the default still is the number chose by the livetable creator, but
user
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:55, Guillaume Lerouge
<guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:33, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Currently the number of rows displayed in a livetable is fixed at
> creation
> > time.
> > I proposed to add UI controls (currently select) that allows to
change
the
> pagination size freely by the end user.
>
> This patch is be both a change in livetable.js to support these
controls
> > (one or more), and a change in the livetable macro to allow them.
I have already a patch and some screenshots as well as bare
documentation,
you can review them all at
I am currently testing different browsers to ensure there is no
regression.
WDYT ?
Sounds very nice to me, I was asked about it in the past so I'm +1.
Only question -> is the preference remembered for the user? I guess not thought
I'd ask.
Well this is mainly a new functionality on the livetable, no change in XE
in
my patch currently. My feeling is that keeping the information for the should not be done by the livetable itself (JS),
but by the caller (the
macro, why not). It would not be so difficult to do with cookies, it
would
be a little bit more work to store the
information in the user profile.
Anyway, this is a second step.
By the way, I have not proposed to change the current pages of XE, but it
could be a nice idea. Do not hesitate to propose page you want me to
improve. The other way, we may also set this new feature as a default, so
it
will apear on all existing livetables using the macro, and allow
disabling
it. WDYT ?
Yes, I'd make this available by default to all livetables, with a
configuration parameter allowing to disable it on a case-by-case basis.
Guillaume
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5250
days inactive
5250
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Denis Gervalle -
Guillaume Lerouge -
Jerome Velociter