(This is a repost of my posting on 2007-Feb-07 with the same title
and content)
For those running XWiki 0.9 on a Postgres database, the following
database upgrade procedure might be useful.
STEP (1) Backup the existing database using pg_dump with --data_only
and --attribute-inserts
STEP (2) Create a new database with the XWiki 1.0Beta schema
(schema_pre.sql)
STEP (3) Restore the data into the new database
STEP (4) Update the new database schema to be full compatible with
the 1.0Beta schema (schema_post.sql)
STEP (5) Start XWiki 1.0B3
The detailed procedure is outlined in schema_pre.sql.
Please report any success or failure so that the community can learn
from your experience and we can improve the tools.
Good luck!
Rudolf VanderLeeden
vanderleeden(a)logicunited.com
Attachments:
- schema_pre.sql
- schema_post.sql
Hi,
I've installed xwiki 1.0 beta4 and imported the xar file, but got errors:
It showed that XWiki.Pereference and Rights can not be installed correctly.
I could not delete the xar file either. Anyone can help? Many thanks.
--
Best regards,
Xin
The issue is XWIKI-928
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergiu Dumitriu [mailto:sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com]
Sent: Fri 3/2/2007 11:30 PM
To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Beta 4 issue - Bullets in table columns not displyed correctly
I can confirm this. Could you make a jira issue on http://jira.xwiki.org/ ?
Sergiu
On 3/2/07, Martin Barrs <martin.barrs(a)visilent.com> wrote:
>
> FYI:
>
> Wanting to display a number of bulleted items in a single table column,
> the bullets are not displayed as bullets, but as asterisks. WYSIWYG editing
> displays the table with the bullets, as intended.
>
>
> The code is:
>
>
>
> {table}
> Criteria | Scope | Taxonomy | Value
> TechnologyLock-In | Per Framework |\\
> * Is it Standards based?\\
> * # of Alternatives\\
> * Ease of transition to alternatives\\
> * Available support for the framework|
> VendorLock-In | Per Framework |\\
> * Is it Standards based?\\
> * # of Alternatives\\
> * Ease of transition to alternatives\\
> * Available support for the framework |
> {table}
>
>
>
> This is on V1 Beta 4.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Martin
>
>
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
FYI:
Wanting to display a number of bulleted items in a single table column,
the bullets are not displayed as bullets, but as asterisks. WYSIWYG
editing displays the table with the bullets, as intended.
The code is:
{table}
Criteria | Scope | Taxonomy | Value
TechnologyLock-In | Per Framework |\\
* Is it Standards based?\\
* # of Alternatives\\
* Ease of transition to alternatives\\
* Available support for the framework|
VendorLock-In | Per Framework |\\
* Is it Standards based?\\
* # of Alternatives\\
* Ease of transition to alternatives\\
* Available support for the framework |
{table}
This is on V1 Beta 4.
Thanks
Martin
Hmm, probably more directed at the xwiki dev team; and anyone out there
who's using LDAP for authentication.
I was looking over a few of my listed user requests this morning, and it
struck me just how often folks are having problems with user passwords.
To combat that, LDAP is most likely going to be our priority
implementation (don't think there will be many problems with that, it's
quite nicely documented).
HOWEVER,
This got me to thinking about the single sign-on (SSO) which is
practically a given for users that are on any sort of directory service
when considering major applications - for example, Outlook, Google's
office suite, etc.
I was wondering if anyone had given some thought to how this may work
with Xwiki? Granted, it's not a critical issue, but surely there is
some benefit to users having an automatic logon based on their
already-authenticated network authentication?
Brandon Esbach
Software Engineer
Tyco Electronics
LoughMahon Technology Park,
Skehard Road,
Blackrock,
Cork, Ireland
Tel +353 21 4808305
Hi, Oskar,
Completely new to xWiki I'm afraid I can't be of much help. But I think there is a clear thing: "documents" are in the database.
HTH,
Ricardo
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
Your XEN ICT Team
>>> Oskar E. Skeide<oskaremil(a)gmail.com> 1/3/2007 15:49 >>>
OK, I guess I just have to edit the document then, to ensure a proper formatting. But when I choose the "Edit" option it seems like it's only the content DIV I can edit. I guess I have to find the document in my filesystem and edit it from there. Problem is, I can't find that document. Where are the WXiki documents stored ? I cannot find them anywhere in [TOMCAT_HOME]/webapps/xwiki/
I am trying to get xwiki to run under ColdFusion MX7 server running with IIS 5. I added the classpath to root/xwiki in ColdFusion, but we can't get xwiki to run. Are we overlooking something? Can xwiki run under ColdFusion MX7 server and IIS?
I imported the default pages from the XWiki homepage, everything looks fine
except for the frontpage. It seems like a CSS problem. I've tried to view
the page in Firefox 2.0 and IE6. In IE6 the panel menu ( which is supposed
to be located right) appears in the top-left corner. In Firefox it appears
bottom-left. Sometimes it displays correctly, but not as often as it
displays incorrect.
When I click another link the menu displays where it should ( top-right)
You can take a look at it here:
http://mypal.kicks-ass.org:8180/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
--
if(!Coffee.Exists)
{
me.Dispose();
throw new NullCoffeeException();
}
Hi,
For those using a custom XWiki configuration with a custom web.xml,
we have changed yesterday the way to configure xwiki. Namely we have
changed the way XWiki is initialized.
So if you're using a custom web.xml and you wish to upgrade to the
trunk version (or to 1.0 beta 5 when it's out) you'll need to read
the following:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
ReleaseNotesXWiki10Beta5#HMigrationnotesfromallpreviousversions
Thanks
-Vincent
Hey there,
I was looking at skins for xwiki, as I am not that fond of the
default xwiki10b1 and I found xwiki10.
This skin looks good, but unfortunately the registration link is
broken (linking to a page that does not exist).
Can someone point me to a way to fix this or indeed if there is a
nice clean (more compact) skin
available for general use?
Thanks,
Andy