Hi
Maybe I just don't get it, but it seems to me that on the blog level the
usability, meaning to edit the document, suddenly breakes with the usual way
to do it (Inline from). Is it a feature or a bug?
Cheers,
Squirrel
hello again.
i have tried to solve this paragraph rights for the last couple of days. didn't work :)))
i made a var similar to $isAdvancedUser called $isMyUser and tried to give it or not access to parts of a page. then i tried to create a macro that i can add in my page where i want to protect the text. i was probably doing something very much wrong . and so i am starting again. i have read your idea more times to be sure i get it:)
i am curious where did u put the #includeTopic('Sandbox.FirstParagraph') or more importantly where have u explained what does that mean. i see this as a method. i still don;t know if xwiki knows about methods.
lost :)))
Take care ,
Gabriela Radu :)
www.gabrielaradu.com
----- Original Message ----
From: [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT Team <webmaster(a)environmentalchange.net>
To: XWiki Users <users(a)xwiki.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 1:36:38 PM
Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] special rights
Hi Gabriela,
Gabriela Radu wrote:
> hello..
> i don't think i get what you said about the rights on space..
> i was talking about sections from the page that can have different rights(to edit or not) then the page.
> this is what i am trying to make... and yep...i said trying. a bit lost. if you have some pointers they are more then welcomed :D
> i have to write something like macros? in .vm files?
> thank you
Sorry if I have not been able to explain myself. In fact, the problem is
that I am also a bit lost!
Let's try to start again (it will help me with this issue! It is
important for our group as well):
We are speaking about being able to create a "page" where "sections" can
have different assigned rights.
Look at this:
http://xepecnet..environmentalchange.net/xwiki/bin/view/Sandbox/NichitaStan…
It seems a "page" including text, but it only includes five "calls" to
other "pages". Look at the code:
#includeTopic('Sandbox.Title')
#includeTopic('Sandbox.FirstParagraph')
#includeTopic('Sandbox.SecondParagraph')
#includeTopic('Sandbox.ThirdParagraph')
#includeTopic('Sandbox.FourthParagraph')
In this case I am using a page (a single XWiki entry in a single space,
in this case, Sandbox.NichitaStanescu) as a "document" metaphor and I
can assign rights to any of the pieces as you do with any other page. I
must not be difficult to add a button close to the starting point of
each paragraph that only appears if the logged user has edit rights on
each "section" and allow him/her to edit it.
Please, let me know if this makes sense for you! It will be help me to
decide if this makes sense for me! Then, we could go ahead completing
this solution.
XWiki is PLENTY of tools/features. The "only" point is to put it in the
correct order :-)
Cheers,
Ricardo
BTW: I think it is time to add XWiki to your CV ;-)
--
Ricardo RodrÃguez
Your EPEC Network ICT Team
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
Ricardo,
Perhaps, yes you could filter results for XWiki, Main, Panel and perhaps add
central customisation in the admin pages to specify what to include/exclude
for specific types of user - so admin users see everything, developers see
developer pages, and other users see only pages/spaces relevant to them,
etc.
So spaces and page would need to have a tag to define the type of space/page
and then when the spaces and pages are listed in an index, panel or search
then spaces/pages can be filtered out which aren't relevant for a particular
page. This could be an additional feature built into XWiki. In addition
could provide filtered views on to an XWiki's contents, so a user could
select a view of the XWiki contents based on a set of filter criteria, but
its main use would be to hide irrelevant content to particular users e.g.
admin/code type page from general users.
What do other users think of having such a feature in XWiki?
Regards,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)xwiki.org [mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org]On Behalf
Of [Ricardo RodrÃguez]
Sent: 07 April 2008 11:49
To: users(a)xwiki.org
Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] A default filter for page lists
Hi,
goldring, richard wrote:
>
> Yes I think that's a good idea - it just confuses users when they see
> 'structural' type wiki content - and it looks "messy" - only xwiki admin
> and
> developer users should be able to see xwiki 'structural' pages and
> elements
> when they do searches, view pages in a space or via an index.
>
Don't you think could be enough by filtering results in XWiki, Main and
Panels? I am working with XE, so it is possible that other configurations
require to filter out other spaces as well.
As XWiki is completely flexible and allow you to create customized filters,
I am not sure about the need of adding it by default. You could easily make
this separation by creating new spaces where users create their pages then
filtering search results based on this spaces names.
Just me 2c.
Ricardo
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-default-filter-for-page-lists-tp16432884p16537234.ht
ml
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thales UK Ltd (Wells) DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail
is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for
the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is
unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in
this e-mail. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. We may monitor all
e-mail communications through our networks. If you have received this e-mail
in error, please inform us immediately on +44 (0) 1749 672081 and delete it
and all copies from your system. We accept no responsibility for changes to
any e-mail which occur after it has been sent. Attachments to this e-mail
may contain software viruses which could damage your system. We therefore
recommend you virus-check all attachments before opening. A business of
Thales UK Ltd. Registered Office: 2 Dashwood Lang Road, The Bourne Business
Park, Addlestone, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 2NX Registered in England No.
868273
Yes I think that's a good idea - it just confuses users when they see
'structural' type wiki content - and it looks "messy" - only xwiki admin and
developer users should be able to see xwiki 'structural' pages and elements
when they do searches, view pages in a space or via an index.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)xwiki.org [mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org]On Behalf
Of MSilverboard(a)cfglife.com
Sent: 01 April 2008 20:45
To: users(a)xwiki.org
Subject: [xwiki-users] A default filter for page lists
On pages like the Index and Search Results, it would be helpful to end
users if there were a way to filter out structural objects like classes
and skins from the results list, and show only user-contributed pages.
The XWiki.Results object already filters out things that users don't have
permission to see.
#if ($xwiki.hasAccessLevel("view", $context.user, $itemfullname))
...list items...
#end
I think that what's needed here is some way to classify "content".
Does anyone have recommendations on how to do this?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thales UK Ltd (Wells) DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail
is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for
the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is
unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in
this e-mail. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. We may monitor all
e-mail communications through our networks. If you have received this e-mail
in error, please inform us immediately on +44 (0) 1749 672081 and delete it
and all copies from your system. We accept no responsibility for changes to
any e-mail which occur after it has been sent. Attachments to this e-mail
may contain software viruses which could damage your system. We therefore
recommend you virus-check all attachments before opening. A business of
Thales UK Ltd. Registered Office: 2 Dashwood Lang Road, The Bourne Business
Park, Addlestone, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 2NX Registered in England No.
868273
Hi,
I would like to modify the xwiki.cfg file to set the e-mail address of the
user.
After retrieving informations from LDAP, I would like to build the e-mail
address and set it to the current user. (Indeed, it is not stored in our AD
DB.)
I tried to do that:
xwiki.authentication.ldap.fields_mapping=name=sAMAccountName,last_name=sn,first_name=givenName,fullname=displayName,email=givenName
'.' sn '@XXX.COM',ldap_dn=dn
but it doesn't work.
I also tried:
xWiki.User.email = "xxxx"
but it doesn't work.
What could I do?
Thanks in advance.
Philippe
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Informations-about-the-user-in-the-xwiki.cfg-file--tp…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi everyone,
I retrieve the informations about people from an Active Directory server
with my xWiki.
The problem is that when someone new arrives and connect, this message will
be shown:
"Your account is not yet active, because your email has not yet been
confirmed."
so my question is quite simple, I would like either disable mail activation,
either automatically activate an new created account. How can I do that?
The next thing is about groups. Let's say that's the first time a guy
connect to the website. I would like him to be automatically added to a
group. How can I do that?
Thanks !
Philippe
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Disable-mail-activation-and-add-automatically-users-t…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Because of having problems with some XWiki functionality (tags, bulletin
board app., ...) I checked environment of our Xwiki installation.
We have:
XWiki 1.3.1
Java 1.5.0_11
Jboss 4.2.2 (for this version Java 1.5 is required)
I read that one of general goals for XWiki Enterprise 1.4 is switch to
Java 1.5, so I’m not sure if we run our Xwiki 1.3 in proper environment.
So, which Java and JBoss version is required (tested with) for 1.3.X XWiki?
Frantisek
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Java-and-JBoss-version-is-required-%28tested-wi…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.