Hello Dan,
I believe the Batik library is used for printing to PDF only, but I
could well be wrong.
You can use an SVG image that you upload as you would upload a png
image. This will simply embed it within the html page and let the
browser render it. This works since recent versions of XWiki (maybe 6?).
I doubt this uses Batik.
Isn't that sufficient?
At least, to my eyes, this is a very important use case for all the
technical documentation we write.
Paul
dullfig <mailto:dan.u@grmcompany.com>
21 April 2016 at 17:54
It is my understanding that XWiki includes the Apache Batik library to
handle
SVG content, so my question is why does XWiki not handle SVG content
natively (without the SVG Macro), and why does the browser have to support
SVG? With Batik, shouldn't XWiki be able to render the SVG without the
help
of the browers?
Dan
--
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-SVG-and-Apache-Batik-tp7599123.html
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users