5 Jun
2010
5 Jun
'10
12:53 a.m.
Hi Caty,
I am glad to see that others are looking at what we do, and it is good time
for them to comment now, since I will not have many more comments now :) I
have replied to some of your comment below...
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 18:54, Ecaterina Valica <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
may
summarize
> > the
> > rights that are not shown. This one would only be shown if there is any
This
> > one would be obviously not editable, and should probably work like the
and
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights43Proposal#H…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights43Proposal#H…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Propos…
)
information
summary,
really
> > better than what we have.
> >
> > If we go for V3 and my 3) proposal, I also wonder if the current table
blindness
arrow.
Personally I would prefer the text variant. If not, I do not see the point
to expand vertically, just put all on a single row.
I do not agree, I see basic as an horizontal presentation and advance to be
a vertical more detailed variant. Maybe the inheritance information from the
tootips could be put in a second column when displaying advanced mode.
No, I would just remove the basic view in favor of a advance one, so there
is no duplication, just a more detailed view of the same information.
> Good point. Here is some proposal for each column:
>
> 1) a dropdown list proposing local (default), global or both ?
>
I would prefer rights separation depending on the location:
- if you want to see global rights - go to global;
- if you want to see wiki rights - go to wiki,
etc.
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights3Proposal#HN…
Why would you like to see both local and global? (filtering?) I think it
will be easier for the user if they are separated.
This is not global in term of right, it is about showing local user/group or
global user/group. In a farm, the user xwiki:XWiki.Admin may receive special
right on mywiki:MySpace.MyPage. So, the filtering would be to filter which
user are shown. This is exactly what the current interface do. Hiding global
user by default is done so because knowing about global user is an advanced
usage that basic users ignore.
So, once again, this has nothing to do with the inheritance of rigths, but
about the origin of the user. And the first column is about user/group, so
it coud fit that need.
Why not, this should be tried to see what it provide. I am not sure this
will be used often, since rights regarding a given level are usually not so
complex that you are unable to read them all. I have seen interesting to
hide inherited only rows, because these are not show currently in the
interface, and this could be useful to revert to current view, especially
for user that has already used this interface.
I hope this is clearer. I really hope that we will now receive more
feedback... and that we will be able to implement this in the near future on
top of the new implementation of the right service from Andreas.
Anyway,congratulation for this great piece of work.
Denis
Hi,
Take a look at Rights 5
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights5Space
Added:
* information regarding the advanced rights (inherits, overrides)
* icons built together as a whole
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/i…
* representation of "advanced rights" with the same abstract icon, but with
different color (no text; we can debate this)
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/c…
* inheritance arrow married with +/-
IMGs (in case of browser problem)
- collapsed:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/r…
- expanded:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/r…
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:42, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
good
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights43Proposal
Clicking
This is perfect, but you should include a little timeout for the tooltips,
or it will be too much invasive.
Hi Caty,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 18:09, Ecaterina Valica <valicac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Denis,
I want to thank you again for all the help you are giving :P
This is pleasure to participate especially because you provide really proposals.
I would also like to see others participating, currently the discussion
is
becoming to much bilateral IMO.
>
> Please take a look at a proposal for "V3 and my 3)" version with
elements
from
Rights2 :)
Really nice job ! I really appreciate.
> The prototype is not reflecting the "desired" interaction: both
inherited
> info and rights change appear on hover
(right icon and arrow), instead
of
hover |
click.
I am not sure what are really your intend. I think that the big tooltips
describing the rights should be the only tooltips, and should be show on
hover only after a small timeout (like the yellow one currently). any where on the +/- icon or v would then open
the menu.
Is it what you try ?
yes, on hover show the tooltip, on click show the menu. From the reaction of Alex and Raluca, I really hope you
will be able to
implement the correct interaction in your samples, since this seems
to cause
a lot of confusion. If you can't, let me know, I will try to find some time
to have a look at it.
>
> That "v" needs to be an arrow like the one we use in the action menus.
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 19:06, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
>
> > Caty,
> >
> > Really nice and interesting post, I will try to reach that level...
but
without visual :\
I really think that using the collapsed view for editing would helps
basic
> users to have a simplified and more easy interface to understand. We even
imagine that only "advanced user" (those marked so in their
profile),
> has access to the expanded view.
>
> I think that the collapsed view missed an additional icon that non-defaulted additional right in action.
This is a signal that extended
rights are in use (See it like the grey box of
Windows when special
rights
> are setup, which is inviting to go into advanced view to know more). ...
> or replace it ? In place of the ... . Concerning the ..., I am not
sure,
> > but
> > I would also prefer to see a textual link "advanced" in small font,
only
visible when row is hovered.
Sorry to insist, but the information regarding the advanced rights is
still
missing in collapsed mode.
I really would like to have a indicator that some advanced rights has
been
set locally or not without having to go advanced
mode. Else, you will
have
to expand all rows to check that information,
which is not practical.
>
>
> > Order of right are not significant, so I would prefer that in all
view,
> > these where in the same order, with the
basic right first
(V/C/E/D/A/P)
> and
> > the additional right in their order of registration (hope that it
will
stay
> constant... or we will have to find a way to keep them ordered).
> The "right" part of each icon should be grayed if the right is
inherited
and
not grayed if the right is set locally, this improve the information
provided in V3.
The problem with this icons (taken from Silk) is that there is little
difference for View, Comment, Admin icons between the two states
(inherited,
locally set) - but this is something we can easily improve (by changing
the
icons and looking for some more contrast).
Example: This is how they look when all rights are set locally (full
color)
> I also think that the +/- (which is never grayed) could be
> nearer to the right icon. Maybe you could use a green V and a read
"stop"
> > in
> > place of +/- ?
> >
>
> The other mockup versions (like
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights41Space used
v/x for the allow/deny representation, and yes, I agree that they are
more
suited than +/-.
The problem is that we are using in XWiki, X to represent delete, so
having
two xX was too much, that's why I introduced
+/-. Maybe we can find
another
solution.
I think we need some polishing on the icons used. Building them
specifically
would be nice, but I do not know if you or anyone want to have a try at
that. My feeling is that the couple +/- or better v/x and the right icon
should be built together and closer to each other providing the as a whole and not giving the impression of two
part. Using a v for
suggesting the menu is nice, could be even improved by styling some
"button
like" borders on hover.
All menus could also be improved by using the inheritance arrow married
with
+/- (or v/x) to show immediately what will be the right if inheritance is
used.
>
>
> >
> > Regarding the collapsed view, I see three possibilities to
investigate
> for
> > allowing edition while improving readability (note that readability
has
> the
> > same issue in expanded view, but it seems to be less annoying) :
> >
> > 1) use V3, but when hovering a row, use V2 on that row and allow
> drag/drop
> > (keeping V2 until drop even is hover is temporary lost). Not sure
this
will
> be nice in practice ? see 2)
>
> 2) use a presentation in 4 columns, for both collapsed and expanded
view,
the first
column behing a read-only summary like V3, and the 3 column
being
> an ordered V1. However, dragging from summary would be allowed. The 3
> detailed column could be shown only when a drag is started from or
> with a global horizontal expansion button... Basic user would have
access
> to
> this, but not necessarily to vertical row expansion. Not sure this is
not
an
increase in complexity ? so, see 3)
3) use V3, and a similar interface to what we have in current right
management interface. Since saved are postponed (not like we have
currently), using this one may be both practical and could helps the
transition for existing user as well. With all the belts and whistle
added
> to clearly state changes and inheritance, this will be similar but > > header is well done. I do not like it
when nothing is expanded since
it
> is
> > confusing, too large, and not significant. It will be even more
> unexpected
> > if you follow me on the "advance user" case, when a basic user look
at
it.
> Maybe you could try a changing header, only expanding when there is
> expanded
> row, or, you could move the expanded header in each expanded row,
keeping
a
icons,
simplified header at the top.
WDYT ?
Denis
Other problem that this proposal has is the representation of "advanced
rights". If we don't like the textual description and we want to add IMO we have two solutions:
A) use the same abstract icon, but with different color, ex. a key or
lock
> icon with color representation ("blue" for "programming",
"green" for
> "captchaComment", etc)
> - the problem here is for the people that have some kind color > and
> will not distinguish between some color tones (this is the case when we
> gonna have lots of "advanced" | non default rights)
>
> B) use the same abstract icon and with an order index (like numbers 1,
2,
etc or
characters A, B, etc)
These representations are based on the fact that "advanced rights" will
be
added by other developers and the icon will not
be custom made for a
specif
right.
Why not just use the big Icons from the menu (using the inheritance arrow
married with +/- as proposed above), and directly followed by the v All this in front of the text ?
inheritance arrow + "right" - to describe "right" as inherited
allowed
inheritance arrow - "right" - to describe "right" as inherited
denied
+ "right" - to describe "right" allowed
- "right" - to describe "right" denied
yes - we could do that if we decide to use the textual variant.
Using a generic icon will not improve information and detailed view of
advanced right in collapsed mode is not expected.
It is not clearly shown on your samples, how multiple advance right would
be
shown. I think one per row is nice, or if you want to limit space, 2 or 3
at
most, shown in columns ?
this depends on which version (textual, icons) we choose for the advanced
rights (I would prefer something linear)
I also wonder is this would help or not to also
extends basic rights in
advanced mode, showing the icons and the text ?
I think this would only add duplicates and mess a bit the meaning of
"advanced" by combining them with "regular".
>
> Another thing we need to consider for this proposal is how the
filtering
> is
> > gonna be made.
>
2) a textbox which filter on names
For advanced users would be nice to have queries, like "allow view" AND
"inherit deny delete" :)
I was filtering on user/group name here, since second columns is about
user/group names and does not relate to rights.
3) a dropdown list proposing all (default), hide
inherited only, and
maybe
the list of rights, showing only rows where the
selected right is set
locally ?
The dropdown with the list of rights (view, edit, etc.) could also have
another dropdown next to it to set the state of the right (inherited,
allowed, denied)
Thanks,
Caty
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO