Op 4 jan. 2016, om 11:20 heeft vincent(a)massol.net het
volgende geschreven:
Hi Peter,
No it’s not been fixed in 6.4.x. Maybe Thomas has decided not to backport it since it
could a bit dangerous? Thomas?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 4 Jan 2016 at 11:02:58, Peter Huisman (p.huisman@ximm.nl(mailto:p.huisman@ximm.nl))
wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the prompt response and great to hear that it is already fixed! I am wondering
(since I can’t find it easily) if you also have fixed in the latest 6.x series since we
are not ready to move to 8.
Br,
Peter
> Op 4 jan. 2016, om 10:59 heeft vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net) het
volgende geschreven:
> Hi Peter,
> On 4 Jan 2016 at 10:55:49, Peter Huisman
(p.huisman@ximm.nl(mailto:p.huisman@ximm.nl)(mailto:p.huisman@ximm.nl)) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question regarding the import of a XAR.
>>
>> When we do an import of a XAR (exported with the History), we have noticed that -
when the document NOT contains an attachment - the version history of the document is
identical to the original (obviously as expected). However, when the document contains an
attachment, it look like a new version of the document is created with the comment being
identical to the last available comment. We have experimented with file an DB store (since
we have multiple servers in use with different setups) but that does not solve this
issue.
>>
>> 1 - Is this the expected result?
>> 2 - Is there a way to work around this (in our case) unwanted result?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for looking at this.
>
> I think you’ve experienced
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9960 which we’ve just
fixed.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Br,
>>
>> Peter