On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:19, Ecaterina Valica
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:01, Denis Gervalle
<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:00, Ecaterina Valica
<valicac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > It will if it display the inheritance source in a column. For right
set
> at
> > current level this column could even precise what inheritance has
been
> > > overwritten, both in terms of allowance and origin.
> > >
> > > Denis.
> >
> >
> > Hi Denis,
> >
> > "Something" like this:
> >
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space
Yes, "something" like that. I would
have expected a "back to basic"
button
in place of "advanced, and the removal of
the basic interface to avoid
duplicating basic rights. Maybe the menu should be horizontal in the
advanced interface, I do not know. Also add some hyperlinks to upper
level
in the column explaining inheritance. And put the
highlight of changes
over
the rest of the row (includes name and
inheritance)
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space
About:
I would have expected a "back to basic"
button
in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid
duplicating basic rights
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Propos…
This removal of the basic interface will be set from the user profile's
variables (if it has advanced type)?
No, just removed when the advanced interface is shown using the advanced
button, like you have done.
I mean if the user is advanced, all the
rows will be presented in advances?
No, the only thing I proposed is that user that are not set "Advanced user"
in their profile, will not be presented the advanced interface link, and
will never see extended rights.
I'm asking because I think the collapsed view
is great to see changes up
in
the table, where you don't care the advanced
status of those rights.
I completely agree. Advanced interface is for understanding and fixing deep
complex stuffs
WDYT ? Is this interesting ?
it's nice :P I would love to see some other opinions.
Yes, could it be possible for you to fix the interactive version to hide
the
basics and also to have hover and click work as expected. I think it will
helps in receiving more feed back with causing confusion.
I found the result really well suited now. There is
just some improvement
in
color contrast, icons aspect, and so on that should be applied if we get
approval for this proposal.
Once you have fixed the sample, I think that a summary page (resume of our
reflexion, and containing only the final proposal) and than a vote thread
could be appropriate to receive feedback from other committers, since the
size of this thread could be pushing back.
Yes, a summary+vote is needed.
I made a version with pagination and filters added.
What do you think?
Could this filters be helpful? Are too powerful/complex/useless?
filter per a column. Anyway this will be a custom livetable,
because we also
need to integrate the "add user" part and the "save/reset" buttons.
Also, from an implementation point of view, should we enable multiselect
(ex. to select multiple rights)?
Obs. Right -> Sources -> Implicit refer to the rights that come from the
setting of another right (example: admin means implicit
view+edit+delete+comment; creator means implicit delete). Would this filter
option be useful or it is too much?
Thanks,
Caty
WDYT ?
Denis
Thanks,
Caty
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs