19 Oct
2011
19 Oct
'11
3:34 p.m.
DITA seems very rich in terms of tags. What I also find a bit complex is
that it looks like HTML, it uses some HTML tags, but it does not seem fully
html compliant.
I think macros could work but probably only for a subset of tags.
Using macros you can do
{{macroname
param1="param1value" param2="param2value"
param3="param3value"}}content that
can have more macros{{/macroname}}
There is quite a lot that can be done with the params. It is possible to
have close to anything in the param values.
As for annotations, maybe Anca can help about what can receive annotation
and what not.
Ludovic
2011/10/19 jerem <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com>
--
Ludovic Dubost
Founder and CEO
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
Do you have an
example of a DITA document.
I have some we use here, but if I strip any confidential info from them
only
the tags will remain :D
I found something more exhaustive from the specs (1.0) about what can be
put
in the body of a topic:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/v1.0/langspec/body.html
The "contains" part gives a good idea of the tags that can be managed. Of
course the complete dita spec contains much more tags.
Macros are a good idea but maybe problem is that (as far as I remember) you
cannot annotate the content of a macro (can you ?).
Well, I believe I'd need to think about it.
--
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Extending-XWiki-collaboration-toolset-tp6…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users