On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: This is not correct. My take is that you've forbidden standard users from reading documents in the XWiki space... -Vincent

On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: I'd suggest you try with a non-modified version of XE and see if you get the same problem. I've just tested with a clean version and it works fine -Vincent

On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: No idea. You could do a search in the source code or on http://fisheye.xwiki.org -Vincent

Removed? Then why I can access it with admin rights? It seems that XWiki.ArticleClassSheet exists only in admin mode? That's very very strange :D Quoting Vincent Massol : /**/ On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: I already have a test version, which is modified the same way - and all is ok. Maybe you could tell conditions when this message is displayed, and where to look for its code (what *.vm). No idea. You could do a search in the source code or on http://fisheye.xwiki.org Well I guess this is the message you'll get if you've removed that page... :) -Vincent Quoting Vincent Massol : On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: But even if give view/edit rights to this group on all spaces and in global rights too, I receive the same message. Only admin right allows a simple user to read blog entry. I'd suggest you try with a non-modified version of XE and see if you get the same problem. I've just tested with a clean version and it works fine -Vincent Quoting Vincent Massol : On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: Some strange things with access rights: to read a blog entry, user must have an admin rights. This is not correct. Otherwise XWiki displays a message "Topic XWiki.ArticleClassSheet does not exist". I know I did something wrong, but don't know what :). Maybe any ideas? My take is that you've forbidden standard users from reading documents in the XWiki space... -Vincent Ar cieņu, Mihails Links: ------ [1] mailto:vincent@massol.net

Solved! For space XWiki I gave edit&view - > allow right. Thought it would allow them to edit and view :). Now I've removed this access right and... it works! But anyway it's strange: I allowed editing, thus disallowing anything. Quoting Vincent Massol : /**/ On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: I already have a test version, which is modified the same way - and all is ok. Maybe you could tell conditions when this message is displayed, and where to look for its code (what *.vm). No idea. You could do a search in the source code or on http://fisheye.xwiki.org Well I guess this is the message you'll get if you've removed that page... :) -Vincent Quoting Vincent Massol : On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: But even if give view/edit rights to this group on all spaces and in global rights too, I receive the same message. Only admin right allows a simple user to read blog entry. I'd suggest you try with a non-modified version of XE and see if you get the same problem. I've just tested with a clean version and it works fine -Vincent Quoting Vincent Massol : On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Mihails Agafonovs wrote: Some strange things with access rights: to read a blog entry, user must have an admin rights. This is not correct. Otherwise XWiki displays a message "Topic XWiki.ArticleClassSheet does not exist". I know I did something wrong, but don't know what :). Maybe any ideas? My take is that you've forbidden standard users from reading documents in the XWiki space... -Vincent Ar cieņu, Mihails Links: ------ [1] mailto:vincent@massol.net

On Jan 12, 2008, at 2:53 AM, Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez wrote: I don't understand the problem. All you need to do is let all users or all registered users have view rights on the XWiki space (since pages from the xwiki space are included in other pages). Re the removal, I don't know, maybe the document is simply in cache and that's why it works for some time. Thanks -Vincent