xwiki-devs

xwiki-devs@xwiki.org

9400 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[xwiki-devs] org.xwiki.gwt

by Aurel RANDOLPH

Hi, Where could I get org.xwiki.gwt library ? Sincerely, Aurel

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] Looking for Menu Application Bug Verification

by DeHaynes

Today I was working on changing the Menu Application so it did not throw an error when a user didn't have permission to the Menu share. I only use the horizontal menu at the top of the page and that is working fine. I went to verify functionality on the left and right menus and they didn't work. They worked when I first installed the Menu Application Extension so, thinking I broke something, I: * Completely Uninstalled the 3 Menu extensions. * Permanently deleted all documents associated with the Menu space. * Re-installed the Menu Application (which installs 2 other Menu extensions it uses.) * Created a new menu by accepting the default menu and set it to the right side of the form, which already has some widgets there. It did not work. So then I went to a completely different wiki server that I hadn't touched in weeks. I tried to put the menu to the right side and it didn't work. I repeated the uninstall and install process and it still doesn't work. Anyone else having this issue? -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Looking-for-Menu-Application-Bug-Verifica… Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] Detect Empty Fields

by DeHaynes

I am trying to use Velocity to dynamically create the output for my form. If a field doesn't have any value, then I want the code to not display. So I came up with the following: #if ($doc.getValue('processOverview')!='') = PROCESS OVERVIEW = <div style="padding-left: 25px;"> $doc.display('processOverview') </div> #end However, this is not working. Velocity is ALWAYS finding something in the field even though when I go to edit it, there is nothing there. Am I missing something? As a work around, I have tried to find a Trim function in velocity and also a Lenth function. I haven't been able to find either of those. Anyone have any suggestions? -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Detect-Empty-Fields-tp7589773.html Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 1 month

Re: [xwiki-devs] Check if field is empty

by Hamster

Which language? What "field"? This is what I use in Velocity to check if a macro parameter is empty: #if ("$!my_document"=="") #else #end -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Check-if-field-is-empty-tp7589525p7589530… Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] Removing Ratings app dependency from XAForum app ?

by Sofiane Baloul

Hi, I'm working on "XAForum application" ( github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-forum2<https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-forum2m2>) and I found some issues due to "Ratings application" ( github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-ratings) dependency, examples : - Rating stars are displayed on every page (maybe the admin who installed the application doesn't expect or want this behavior. It has already been reported as an issue too :jira.xwiki.org/browse/XAFORUM-26) - XAForum app vote and ratings app vote use the same object (same XClasse) which may lead to a wrong result. XAForum vote expects only +1 (== means I like) on a topic, however Rating app vote expects 1 to 5 (5 stars) on a page, which means if a user rate a topic page +5, this means too, there are 5 other users like this topic, which is wrong !! To avoid these issues, I think we need to remove the ratings app dependency from XAForum app and implement a specific vote for this (XAForum) app. WDYT ? Thanks, Sofiane Baloul

11 years, 1 month

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Revert change that prevents users from using xwiki syntax 1.0

by Marius Dumitru Florea

+0, snippets in XWiki 1.0 syntax are not good examples for our users.. How many such snippets do we have on e.x.o.? Thanks, Marius On Mar 21, 2014 9:52 AM, "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: > > Hi devs, > > Sergiu implemented http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8988 a while ago and I didn't agree with it (see my comment there). > > I have 2 arguments: > 1) Lots of code snippets on e.x.o are still in syntax 1.0 and if you need to test them you still need to be able to create pages in 1.0 syntax > 2) We shouldn't hardcode anything and right now we have hardcoded the knowledge of the xwiki/1.0 syntax in DocumentInformation.xml: > > #foreach ($syntax in $availableParserSyntaxes) > #if ($configuredSyntaxes.contains($syntax.toIdString()) && !$syntax.toIdString().equalsIgnoreCase('xwiki/1.0')) > > The important part for me is that the xwiki/1.0 syntax is NOT enabled by default in xwiki.cfg and thus users won't use it by mistake. Only those who really need to use it would be able to use it. > > I'd like to reinstate the ability to use xwiki/1.0 syntax in XWiki 5.x by removing the hardcoded check. > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs(a)xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] [UX][Proposal] Application: Calendar

by Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)

Hi, One of the objectives of 6.0 is to review the existing applications on extensions.xwiki.org, improve them and see how they would integrate in the new Flamingo skin (while also making improvements suggestions). This mail covers the Flamingo integration for the MoccaCalendar application. You can see the proposal at: http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/CalendarApplicationDesign Any feedback is welcomed (especially from Denis and Clemens :) ). Thanks, Caty

11 years, 1 month

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Revert change that prevents users from using xwiki syntax 1.0

by Thomas Mortagne

+1 We have tons of if(syntax==xwiki/1.0), one less would be nice especially when it's not that useful. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:52 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: > Hi devs, > > Sergiu implemented http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8988 a while ago and I didn't agree with it (see my comment there). > > I have 2 arguments: > 1) Lots of code snippets on e.x.o are still in syntax 1.0 and if you need to test them you still need to be able to create pages in 1.0 syntax > 2) We shouldn't hardcode anything and right now we have hardcoded the knowledge of the xwiki/1.0 syntax in DocumentInformation.xml: > > #foreach ($syntax in $availableParserSyntaxes) > #if ($configuredSyntaxes.contains($syntax.toIdString()) && !$syntax.toIdString().equalsIgnoreCase('xwiki/1.0')) > > The important part for me is that the xwiki/1.0 syntax is NOT enabled by default in xwiki.cfg and thus users won't use it by mistake. Only those who really need to use it would be able to use it. > > I'd like to reinstate the ability to use xwiki/1.0 syntax in XWiki 5.x by removing the hardcoded check. > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs(a)xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Revert change that prevents users from using xwiki syntax 1.0

by vincent＠massol.net

Hi devs, Sergiu implemented http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8988 a while ago and I didn’t agree with it (see my comment there). I have 2 arguments: 1) Lots of code snippets on e.x.o are still in syntax 1.0 and if you need to test them you still need to be able to create pages in 1.0 syntax 2) We shouldn’t hardcode anything and right now we have hardcoded the knowledge of the xwiki/1.0 syntax in DocumentInformation.xml: #foreach ($syntax in $availableParserSyntaxes) #if ($configuredSyntaxes.contains($syntax.toIdString()) && !$syntax.toIdString().equalsIgnoreCase('xwiki/1.0')) The important part for me is that the xwiki/1.0 syntax is NOT enabled by default in xwiki.cfg and thus users won’t use it by mistake. Only those who really need to use it would be able to use it. I’d like to reinstate the ability to use xwiki/1.0 syntax in XWiki 5.x by removing the hardcoded check. WDYT? Thanks -Vincent

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] Any available documentation for the ForumApplication extension?

by echocoder

Could anyone point me to documentation for the ForumApplication extension located here... http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ForumApplication I would like to replace the instance of BulletinBoard in my install of Xwiki with ForumApplication. I am able to add various forums via this page... /xwiki/bin/view/ForumCode/ForumsHomePage However, I seem to not be able to add more than one "new topic" per forum via */xwiki/bin/view/Forums_OKC/WebHome?action=addconversation There are some other cosmetic/administrative things I would like to do as well, but I am thinking if there is documentation I could read it may point me in the right direction. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Any-available-documentation-for-the-Forum… Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

xwiki-devs