There are several such features related to copy and paste (and drag-and-drop) which a newer trends could choose to follow.
I'd be more than happy to advise on a GSoC project for such.
But maybe there's an interest before. It's almost exclusively JS work.
paul
Le 9 nov. 2012 à 12:05, Guillaume Lerouge a écrit :
> No. You have to save it first, then upload it to the wiki page.
>
> Guillaume
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Hamster <teunham(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to paste an image from MS Paint directly into an xwiki page?
Hi devs,
Since last week was light on development (due to various holidays) and
today we are already past the release date for 4.3M2, after talking with
Vincent, we propose to postpone the 4.3 releases by a couple of days, as
follows:
Current dates:
4.3M2: 5 Nov
4.3RC1: 12 Nov
4.3final: 19 Nov
Proposed postpone dates:
4.3M2: 9 nov
4.3RC1: 14 nov
4.3final: 21 nov
Here's my +1 and I will be Release Manager for 4.3M2.
We are still looking for Release Managers for the next releases, so please
feel free to propose your selves
Thanks,
Eduard
This should have been for devs
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Début du message transféré :
> Expéditeur: Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com>
> Date: 23 octobre 2012 09:19:55 UTC+02:00
> Destinataire: XWiki Users <users(a)xwiki.org>
> Objet: Github tracker. was: Re: [xwiki-users] New Realtime collaborative editing extension.
>
> Just a quick. You seem to introduce a practice to use the github tracker instead of xwiki.org jira's
>
> Not sure it's a good thing. I'm sure Vincent will agree
>
> Ludovic
>
>
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> Le 23 oct. 2012 à 04:17, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> a écrit :
>
>> One other thing, please report the features which you want and what you imagine as
>> best on the github tracker, it's easier to close an issue as "won't fix" than it is
>> to remember an important issue which nobody wrote down ;)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Caleb
>>
>> On 10/22/2012 10:14 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the complement.
>>>
>>> I just updated it and fixed issue #1. Thanks for reporting it.
>>> Somehow showing who else is editing, showing where they are editing in the document
>>> and allowing the user to spawn a chat window with other editors on the page are all
>>> interesting possibilities. Right now I think the thing to do is decide where there
>>> is the most bang for your buck in terms of feature value and get an idea of what's
>>> most natural for the user.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Caleb
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/19/2012 07:59 AM, Ryszard Łach wrote:
>>>> Great work!
>>>>
>>>> It looks like good starting point to give xwiki the main (at least for
>>>> me) feature, that makes googledoc sometimes more suitable for
>>>> collaborative editing. It would be really great, if your editor would
>>>> show somehow, where the other editor (person) is now, where is his
>>>> cursor. Maybe a highlight (the whole line) showing the other's cursor
>>>> placement?
>>>> Do you plan to work on such improvements?
>>>>
>>>> R.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> users(a)xwiki.org
>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> users(a)xwiki.org
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users(a)xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
I am requesting a vote for adding the following clirr difference:
<difference>
<className>com/xpn/xwiki/objects/ListProperty</className>
<field>list</field>
<differenceType>6006</differenceType>
<justification>Elemenents must be added to the wrapping
NotifyOnUpdateList to ensure that the property is marked 'dirty' when
updated. To avoid that this mechanism is circumvented, the field is made
final.</justification>
</difference>
The flag isContentDirty in XWikiDocument is currently always true when a
document is loaded from the database. This means that a script that
just load and save a document without modifying it will generate a new
version, and the point of the flag is completely lost. It is also a
blocker for my work in the feature-authorization-context branch.
Fixing this was non-trivial. It is assumed everywhere that the content
dirty will be set, not only when the document content changes, but also
when a property, the xclass or any attachment changes. But there were
no code that actually set the flag on updates (because it was always
true anyway). What's worse is that we have API methods that returns
lists that are live updateable. I have added a wrapper list class to
detect the updates in these lists.
Hibernate refuse to store elements from my wrapper list for some reason
which forced me to add a workaround for hibernate.
Surprisingly, Clirr doesn't require any exception for the below methods
which I have added, but I will list them here for your information:
In BaseClass:
public void setOwnerDocument(XWikiDocument ownerDocument)
public void setDirty(boolean isDirty)
In BaseProperty:
public boolean isValueDirty()
protected void setValueDirty(Object newValue)
public void setValueDirty(boolean valueDirty)
public void setOwnerDocument(XWikiDocument ownerDocument)
In ListProperty:
public void setUseHibernateWorkaround(boolean useHibernateWorkaround)
In XWikiAttachmentContent:
public void setOwnerDocument(XWikiDocument ownerDocument)
New class: AbstractNotifyOnUpdateList<E>
Best Regards,
/Andreas
Hi devs,
We need a RM for 4.3M2 which should have been released yesterday...
See the Roster to see if you'd be a good candidate:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ReleaseManagerRoster
If you haven't done a lot of releases yet then you're a good candidate ;)
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
Quick vote on the name of the localization module:
* $services.l10n
* $services.localization
something else ?
I'm ok with both even if "localization" is a bit "cleaner".
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi devs,
Quick vote for the macro name:
* {{l10n}}
* {{locallization}}
localization is a bit too long for a macro so I would go for "l10n".
We can also decide to maintain both aliases.
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi All,
I want to include one page into another page in terms of content instead of
velocity code, for example, the Blog.WebHome is a page without velocity
code if you choose Edit->Wiki, but it has Blog.BlogClass if you select
Edit->Objects, from Blog.WebHome page, I can create a new post with tile
testpage, now the Blog.testpage is the new page created that I need to
include into another page, this testpage has no velocity code from
Edit_>Wiki. so how to include that page into a different page?
I tried: include Macro, includeInContext Macro, includeTopic Macro, none of
them displays the testpage for me, any idea?
Thanks very much for your help.
David
Here's the commit
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/a6f4bd499fc2b1cf3757d423205a…
. The main changes are:
* Move the JS/CSS of the date picker used by AppWithinMinutes into the
file system (/resources/uicomponents/widgets/datepicker).
* Apply checkstyle to DateProperty and DateClass.
* Modify DateClass to use the AWM date picker when the 'picker' meta
property is set.
* Add back the 'picker' meta property to Date property (in
DateMetaClass) to allow developers to use a different picker than the
default one (or no picker at all).
* Use Boolean property for 'picker' and 'emptyIsToday' meta properties
(was Number property). Since a Boolean property is stored as an
integer property the only difference will be visually (checkbox
instead of text input).
I'd like to merge this into the platform. My +1.
Thanks,
Marius