10 +1 and nobody against it, vote pass.
Welcome aboard Eduard !
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hi committers,
>
> I would like to propose a new committer on https://github.com/xwiki/
>
> Eduard first officially contacted the XWiki community trough GSoC in
> 2008 on an XEclipse (https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-eclipse) project.
> After having done a great job on XEClipse he became an employee while
> he was doing his 1st year master studies.
>
> He is an SAS employee for almost 3 years now and worked in the
> Research Team developing 3 open source research projects focused on
> XWiki: Concerto (https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/concerto), Scribo
> (https://bitbucket.org/scribo/scribo) and now Wiki3.0
> (https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/wiki30).
>
> He was a GSoC co-mentor in 2010 and 2011 for XEclipse and Android
> client projects.
>
> - Eduard is very active on the mailing list and answer efficiently
> - Eduard worked and will work a lot on wiki manager and XEM which
> really need some love
> - Eduard sent a lot of good pull requests theses days and I'm tired of
> applying them ;)
>
> Some stats:
>
> - Mails sent by Eduard (121):
> http://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=from%3AEduard%20Moraru
>
> - Eduard's github profile
> https://github.com/Enygma2002
>
> - Eduard's Masterbranch profile
> https://www.masterbranch.com/developer/Enygma
>
> - Eduard's ohloh profile
> https://www.ohloh.net/accounts/Enygma
>
> I will add that it's very pleasent to work with Edy.
>
> I'm +1 to make Edy a committer.
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
5 +1 and no other votes, done.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now it's pretty dangerous to manipulate script services from Velocity.
>
> If even you try to get a service that does not exist that will produce
> an exception which will kill your script for good. It's a pain to have
> use case like using a service only if it's here and fallback on
> something else otherwise.
>
> For example even if you disabled CSRF XWiki will fill in many places
> if you even think or removing the csrf jar. That seems pretty bad to
> me.
>
> The exception does not bring much value to scripts here (even for
> scripts supporting it) so I proposed to return null instead of
> throwing an exception.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi all,
Some time ago we discussed [1] a proposal
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgProposal2
about changing the way our community website (www.xwiki.org) looks like
(improved homepage, improved navigation, new logo [2], new skin, community
wiki [3], etc.).
Since then there have been some small collaborative efforts to make this new
site come true and I want to thank for their help to Sergiu Dumitriu, Marta
Girdea, Jean-Vincent Drean, Raluca Stavro, Vincent Massol, Silvia Rusu,
Raluca Moisa, Stefan Orzu and all the people that gave feedback.
In order to speed up the process we also created a development wiki
http://newxwiki.xwiki.org/
where you can log in with your xwiki.org credentials and work on the
improvements you want to make. After the work is finished it will be ported
to xwiki.org. This way you can experiment the way your code looks like and
behaves without interfering with the live site.
Also me and Silvia created a planning for the development of the new site
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgPlanning
and we have split it into 4 stages. We are currently in Stage 1 of the
development.
Each entry has it own link with more information/mockups/code about the
feature. Also features that have been started have also a JIRA issue
attached to them.
We would be very happy if the community could get involved in helping us
making this happen. We still need work on deciding the content for some
sections, we need better design proposals for some elements and we need lots
of implementation work to make everything a reality.
If you want to participate you should pick something from the planning and
announce it on this thread so that we know what feature is taking care of.
Thank you,
Caty
References:
[1] [Proposal] XWiki.org horizontal navigation + home page
http://markmail.org/thread/tfmrludhw2yh5tcn
[2] [Proposal] XWiki.org Logo Challenge - Round 2
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/pkdd5kijpt2yqeph
[3] [Proposal] XWiki.org Community Page
http://markmail.org/thread/b3pctp2kepcprfaf
Hi devs,
Right now it's pretty dangerous to manipulate script services from Velocity.
If even you try to get a service that does not exist that will produce
an exception which will kill your script for good. It's a pain to have
use case like using a service only if it's here and fallback on
something else otherwise.
For example even if you disabled CSRF XWiki will fill in many places
if you even think or removing the csrf jar. That seems pretty bad to
me.
The exception does not bring much value to scripts here (even for
scripts supporting it) so I proposed to return null instead of
throwing an exception.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1.
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Devs,
Last database migrator is very old now, it was on revision 15428 of our SVN
repository.
The rules at that time was to use the revision number of the SVN commit for
the database version.
So our database is currently in version 15428.
Since we have no more revision number in Git, and that the database version
should be an integer, we need to vote a new convention:
A) continue from where we are, incrementing by one, so next version will be
15428
B) use 16000, or another round number for next revision and increments by
one for next version
C) use a mix with the current XWiki version, so next will be 32000, and we
have room for 1000 versions during the 3.2 releases.
Personally, since database changes are really rare, since we were already
jumping, and since there is plenty of room for number, I prefer meaning
full number and I prefer C. The major advantage is that the number is in the
database, so if you have a db dump, you may quickly know what is the oldest
version this dump is compatible with without needing some reference list.
So my +1 for C.
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi,
I'm proposing to move the following modules from xwiki-platform-core to separate git repos in a xwiki-contrib organization on GitHub:
xwiki-platform-calendar
xwiki-platform-exo
xwiki-platform-adwords
xwiki-platform-alexa
xwiki-platform-photoalbum
xwiki-platform-s5
xwiki-platform-workstream
Rationale:
* They're no longer working or supported
* We can move them back if the xwiki dev team wants to support them again in the future
* It's cleaner than having a retired module in the xwiki organization since a) it's not "polluting" the list of repos supported by the xwiki dev team and b) it allows them to be separated in repos
Future:
* Also move modules currently in svn contrib to xwiki-contrib org. Note that we need to verify if the svn app works with the GitHub svn integration too since several users of svn contrib are using it.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi (especially Sergiu),
I think you worked on removing the dependency on Albatross, right?
Is it finished? Can can we move the Albatross skin to contrib/retried?
See http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/jx5vyqtrwwaidfka
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
I propose to expose XWikiContext.getUserReference() to the web API
(api.Context), specifically:
/**
* Returns the document reference for the profile page of the current
user which made the request. If there's no
* currently logged in user in XWiki then the returned reference is for
<i>XWiki.XWikiGuest</i> which represents any
* anonymous user. The returned reference can always be considered an
absolute document reference, meaning that
* <code>getUserReference().getWikiReference().getName()</code> will
always return the name of the user's wiki.
*
* @return The document reference for the current user which made the
request.
*/
public DocumentReference getUserReference()
{
return getXWikiContext().getUserReference();
}
Some more details are available at http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-6964
A pull request is available at
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/23
Here's my +1
Thanks,
Eduard
Hi devs,
Just seen this in Jenkins:
https://skitch.com/e-vmassol/f3rhr/update-center-jenkins
Basically each page has a "Localize this page" button at the bottom and when clicked you have a dialog box to provide translations in all languages for the strings to translate on the page.
I found this nice and easy for users since:
- they have the context (they can see the rendered page) when performing the translation
- it's easy and quick to use (no need to leave their application)
I haven't thought about it but an extension to do this in XE could be great.
I don't know how we could autodiscover the strings to translate though but it's probably possible.
Just an idea.
-Vincent