Hi,
You probably did notice from the mailing lists that we do need
developers (and testers), especially at this point, when XWiki 1.0
should be out in a few days, and when the XWiki 2.0 architecture must
be finalized and implemented. So your help is very appreciated.
"Not hard to implement" differs from person to person. Could you tell
us what are your strong points? Java, databases, html+css, javascript,
velocity, testing, documentation?
On 5/9/07, Gurnani, Anil <agurnani(a)bear.com> wrote:
Ok so I have been a member of the dev mailing list for
over six months
and I have been playing with the latest releases of xwiki for six months
and now I am itching to contribute :-)
Anybody has any ideas for some cool (yet not very hard to implement
cause my understanding of the code is very minimal at this point)
feature to get my feet wet?
Anil
Sergiu
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu