Hi,
I've published the XE 1.4 general roadmap directions on
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
In addition here's a proposal for the release dates:
* 1.4M1: 28th of March 2008
* 1.4M2: 18th of April 2008
* 1.4RC1: 25th of April 2008
* 1.4RC2: 2nd of May 2008
* 1.5 Final: 6th of May 2008
I'm entering those into JIRA
Ok with everyone?
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi all,
I downloaded XWiki Enterprise 1.3 RC1 some weeks ago and brought it to
run with MySql 4 and Tomcat 5.0.28.
Now, I want to do the same for the new version 1.3, but I want to build
this version from source.
Is there a way to get the complete source of version 1.3? (For Building
- and especially for my understanding)
And how can I compare the differences of the source code of two released
versions (e.g. XWiki Enterprise 1.2 and 1.3), so that I can review the
consequences of changing a release in the future?
Thanks a lot and
best Regards,
Marco
P.S. I'm new to this list. Please apologize, if this question is asked
before.
Hi committers,
I don't know the only one who do that to debug XWiki on Eclipse I'm
creating web project mirror of the product web I'm working on (for
example XEM) and use "j2ee module dependencies" property to
dynamically link xwiki-core and plugins. This way when modifying
something in plugin it's automatically built and published without
the need to rebuild all XEM to get a complete distribution package
with all necessary dependencies included.
I think it's pretty similar to what I seen for some of you with IntelliJ IDEA.
The "problem" here is that Eclipse automatically add
META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the first source directory of web project
linked projects it can find : in our case it's always src/main/java
(at least in core/plugins/components cases). In this case Eclipse does
not generate this file at build time like maven do.
Considering that we never add META-INF in src/main/java but in
src/main/resources for a maven project I always added it to svn:ignore
in the past. As I had a chat with Vincent who is not agree with this
way to do I'm wondering what you think of that ?
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi XWikiers,
We'd like to refactor the wiki & space administration for XE 1.4.
Layout drafts and full proposal are available here :
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/ImproveWikiAdministration
Summary :
* Display the administration features in wiki pages, in view mode (ie
: move code from the admin templates to wiki pages)
* Merge the current XWiki.WebHome items with the current
Administration features in the new UI
* Merge the import / export features in the same page
* Put the Panels list and PanelWizard in the new UI
Tech :
* new XWiki.WebHome : direct links (with big icons) to admin
categories (a la Windows control panel)
* A main administration sheet : XWiki.AdministrationSheet (may be
with cascading admin sheets beyond)
* Inclusion of XWiki.AdministrationSheet in XWikiPreferences (global prefs)
* Inclusion of XWiki.AdministrationSheet in all WebPreferences (quick
access to space admin)
Questions :
* Do we add an "Administration" entry in the top menu bar ? With 2
dropdown items :
** current space administration
** wiki administration
* Do we really need the "big icons" page (since all the categories
are available from the left column) ?
wdyt ?
Thanks,
JV.
Hi,
How do you feel about the next usage scenarios for the observation
component?
A. Simple observing of changes
This is the most common usage of the old notification mechanism. It
allows a listener to see when something gets changed. It receives as the
source the changed document, from which it can get the original document
(there's a doc.getOriginalDocument() method for this). For the moment,
the data argument is the context, as it is still a vital object for most
of the code, and it has to be passed around all the time.
The event will hold the type of change, like adding a new document,
deleting, or just saving a new version. In the future I'd like to
increase the granularity, to make this "change" a set of basic changes,
to be able to say that (object added, attachment removed, content
changed) is what happened to the document (see
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XE-213 too).
With this event, a listener can then update some data indexer, like the
Lucene plugin does, or send the new documents/attachments to a
repository, or send a mail with the new code, or ping on IRC.
B. Simple observing of actions
This is also implemented in the old notification mechanism. It allows a
listener to monitor actions. It receives as the source the affected
document, and as the additional data the same context, as it is needed.
The event holds the action name, and I'd like to add the full URL, too,
as other important information might be in there. I don't know if
sending the complete request object is a good idea, but I think we
should be able to obtain it somehow.
With this event, a listener can update some statistics, refresh some
caches or cleanup some indexes, send an attachment to another repository
(like SVN), or, based on the URL, it can be used to take some action,
like if the action was "createspace" and the "notify=admins" parameter
was given in the request, then the observer can send the notifications,
without polluting the application code with the checks and mail sending
calls.
C. Precondition/Postcondition enforcing
The previous two use cases allow a simple ping that something has
already happened. (Actually, the listeners can also change the passed
document, as the actual object is sent.) But I'd like to be able to
write a listener that can say "this is not allowed, please stop this
action", or "these changes are not OK, don't save this document". So, a
precondition can be that "/save/" cannot be performed between 6PM and
7AM, which would be a needed feature in some companies, or that "/view/"
cannot be performed on the "SectionA" space from the IP addresses like
192.168.2.*, which belongs to the SectionB users (these are action
events). And a postcondition can be that the XWiki.XWikiPreferences can
only be updated by changing XWikiGlobalRights objects, other types of
changes can only be performed by a superadmin only, or that adding some
content that looks like spam is not allowed (these are document events).
So, on top of the previous use cases, I'd like to add a "phase" to the
events, which indicates if the event is sent before or after the change
(or we can just add new events), and a new type of exception thrown by
the listeners, which is not ignored. Right now, if a listener throws an
exception, it is ignored. This exception, when received by the code that
sends the notification, should stop the normal processing and display
"action not allowed" + ex.getMessage to the user.
D. Rendering hooks
While working on the SkinExtensions and trying to write a better #toc
macro, I was faced with the problem that there's no way a plugin can
change the rendered content at the end. Yes, it can alter it line by
line, and in theory there is an endRenderingHook sent with the content,
but that is actually buggy, as an empty string is sent instead of the
content, and the result is discarded. Still, even if fixed, this is sent
only for *rendered* content, not *parsed* content. My initial idea was
to change the PluginInterface by adding two new methods that will be
called before and after the content was generated, but that is a bad
idea, since the PluginInterface is already too big and has too many
types of methods. And since the new rendering component is not yet
available, I thought that we can also use events for this.
So, instead of writing new methods in the PluginInterface, we can add
other type of events, which gets sent in the parsing/rendering process.
That way, we don't need to have a plugin that implements all these
methods, and adding a new feature will require just sending a new type
of event, instead of changing an interface (which is dangerous).
The source would be an object holding the string, which can be modified
by the listeners. Other information could be the content document, if
there is one, the rendering/parsing context, anything else?
E. Other generic events
Like FlushCacheEvent, StartupEvent, ShutdownEvent, VirtualInitEvent,
VirtualShutdownEvent (sent when a wiki is deleted by the
WikiManagerEvent), Application[Added/Enabled/Disabled/Removed]Event
(sent by the ApplicationManager), Space[Added/Removed]Event (sent by the
SpaceManagerPlugin), etc.
Comments, please?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Hi fellow XWikiers,
We teased you with a few exclusive t-shirt pictures 2 weeks ago... The time
has now come to offer our community the opportunity to enjoy them too !
We have setup a cafepress account for XWiki, available at
http://www.cafepress.com/xwiki . You'll be able to find there t-shirts,
mugs, caps and many more goodies to play with !
We have put a small profit margin on most products. The money received
through the sale of those goodies will go straight back into the XWiki
Open-Source Community development effort, under a format yet to define (but
the idea will be to reward the most active XWiki committers & contributors
from outside of XWiki SAS - the company).
One address : http://www.cafepress.com/xwiki - enjoy !
I've also added the XWiki logos & other fun images on this page for the
community to enjoy : http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Goodies
We hope to see you all wearing XWiki apparel soon ;-)
On behalf of the XWiki Development Team,
Guillaume
PS : Ricardo, we'd be glad to see the XWiki logo on your sports teams shirts
:-) You'll find all the images you'll need on the Goodies page mentioned
above. Don't forget to send us the pictures when you wear them - and win !
:-)