- xwiki-devs@xwiki.org - lists.xwiki.org

xwiki build.405 Build Successful
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 14 Nov '06

14 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061114122735Lbuild…

1 0

xwiki build.404 Build Fixed
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 14 Nov '06

14 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061114101237Lbuild…

1 0

xwiki Build Failed
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 14 Nov '06

14 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061114092953

1 0

xwiki build.403 Build Successful
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 14 Nov '06

14 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061114080454Lbuild…

1 0

xwiki build.402 Build Successful
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 14 Nov '06

14 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061114031937Lbuild…

1 0

xwiki build.401 Build Successful
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 13 Nov '06

13 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061113225409Lbuild…

1 0

xwiki build.400 Build Successful
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 13 Nov '06

13 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061113215925Lbuild…

1 0

xwiki build.399 Build Successful
by ludovic＠xwiki.org 13 Nov '06

13 Nov '06

View results here -> http://build.xpertnet.biz/cc/buildresults/xwiki?log=log20061113204447Lbuild…

1 0

Issues with building and running with eclipse
by gchoudha 13 Nov '06

13 Nov '06

Hi, I was trying to refer the steps provided for "building and running with Eclipse". The link is http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/Dev+Environment The steps I performed were: 1) Created a new java project from Existing Ant build file. 2) Downloaded the WTP plug-in for eclipse and placed in appropriate folder 3) Downloaded eclipse plug-in for tomcat so that I can start and stop the apache server. 4) Configured for Apache in elipse by windows->preferences->server->installed Runtimes 5) Placed the dotfiles in xwiki folder.(my workspace) 6) release(default) build is successful. 7) When I try to run on debug on server it says "Selection did not contain anything that can be run on the server" Please let me know where I am going wrong. I really need it to get going. Thanks, Gyanesh

4 4

RE: Contributors.txt and @author in license headers
by Vincent Massol 13 Nov '06

13 Nov '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: lundi 13 novembre 2006 16:43 > To: 'xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org' > Subject: Contributors.txt and @author in license headers > > Hi, > > Our license headers say: " * Copyright 2006, XpertNet SARL, and > individual contributors as indicated by the contributors.txt." > > There are 3 problems with this that I can see: > > 1) It's not really English in that it's either missing a "file" at the > end or we should remove the "the" before "contributors" ;-) > 2) I cannot find the contributors.txt file! > 3) I don't think we should explicitely mention the file name as we'll > always risk having to rename all headers if we decide to put this file > somewhere else/name it differently. > 4) In several of our license headers there are @authors. For example: > > /* > * Copyright 2006, XpertNet SARL, and individual contributors as > indicated > * by the contributors.txt. > > [snip] > > * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > * License along with this software; if not, write to the Free > * Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA > * 02110-1301 USA, or see the FSF site: http://www.fsf.org. > * > * @author ravenees > * @author jeremi > */ > > I thought the authors were supposed to be indicated in the > contributors.txt file! :-) > > Personally I don't like @author tags and especially not in license > headers (actually it's the first time I ever see them put there, they > are usually put in the class javadoc). The reason I don't like these > tags is because: > * they are always not up to date and there are usually mane more > authors than the ones listed > * we never know what the author has worked on in the file and to what > extent. For example someone could have simply added a missing dot in a > javdoc. > * this information is better defined in the SCM which contains the full > history and what everyone has exactly contributed to. > > So I'd be in favor of implementing the contributors.txt file and > removing all @authors tags from the license headers. FWIW in cargo, we store contributions in SVN and they're also available on the web site at http://cargo.codehaus.org/Credits. It's never completely up to date but it's a good first approach. This is the equivalent of the contributors.txt file. -Vincent ___________________________________________________________________________ D�couvrez une nouvelle fa�on d'obtenir des r�ponses � toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des exp�riences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/R�ponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com

1 0