I noticed the database schema has changed in the latest svn code - is
there an upgrade script available? I'm trying to create users on the
fly when they login but users are now in XWikiDocument whereas they
were in xwikidoc before in the database so it doesn't work on the
latest code.
thanks,
Alistair
I've downloaded the latest source from svn and the db schema seems to
differ from the current release. When trying to get a user's Principal,
the new source does:
select distinct doc.web, doc.name from XWikiDocument
XWikiDocument table doesn't exist in the current release but I can't seem
to find any info on what the db schema should be for the svn source.
Is there any info on the new db schema? As it stands I can't create/find
users as the schema doesn't match.
thanks,
Alistair
--
Alistair Young
Senior Software Engineer
UHI@Sabhal Mòr Ostaig
Isle of Skye
Scotland
I downloaded the latest source from svn and noticed that xwiki.cfg has this:
wiki.virtual=1
xwiki.virtual.redirect=http://127.0.0.1:9080/xwiki/bin/Main/ThisWikiDoesNotExist
is there any documentation on this as it's a useful feature we could use.
--
Alistair Young
Senior Software Engineer
UHI@Sabhal Mòr Ostaig
Isle of Skye
Scotland
Isn't it a potential security hole for
com.xpn.xwiki.api.XWiki.searchDocuments(*) to return a list of
XWikiDocument instead of wrapping them in a Document like the other
API methods do?
Matt
Hello,
I used to code in php/mysql. But since i discovered xwiki, I really
think it's more powerful.
But, in my opinion there is a thing can be upgrade to facilitate
developtement for webmaster.
as we know There is several URLS :
* view
* edit
* inline
* save
* login
* logout
and others like :
* addcomment
* addobjects
* upload
* delete
I was thinking why some URLs which don't show anything to the users
should not be replace by a more complete Save action programming.
When you save, you can decide
- in which page
- which content
- which objects
- which Files
- can be add, edit, or delete
It will be more clear to understand and to program this kind of thing ?
"Vive xwiki !"
Antoine
Hello!
While implementing something I came around the BaseProperty and while
reading the code I found several strange things. I agree with the
comment above BaseProperty that this class should be abstract, mainly
because getValue() always returns null. Then PropertyClass can be made
abstract as well.
But then I'm stuck a bit with the stuff in XWikiHibernateStore, which
creates also new instances of BaseProperty and PropertyClass. It looks
to me like the code there is simply cloning those objects - but why is
it not using clone() then? Well, it is doing some strange stuff there
anyway.
While looking at all this stuff, I also found several other things which
could be cleaned up to avoid bugs, to increase performance and to make
things easier understandable.
But before I get really started: is this kind of work wanted? I am aware
that with a code base of this size it is easy to break things...
--
Michael Reinsch <mr(a)uue.org> http://mr.uue.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
