On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:01 PM, [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT
Team <webmaster(a)environmentalchange.net> wrote:
Hi!
Pascal Voitot wrote:
the wysiwyg should only be a helper allowing to
access some features more
easily but we need to keep the deep customization features (the XWiki
wysiwyg editor is an example of that... you can write with it but when
you
need to have a more precise view, you go in the
classical editor)
I agree with that! But I think this was not true with the old
XWiki wiki
editor: switching between wiki and WYSIWYG editors results in losses
and/or changes in the format and, as far as I can remember, even
contents (changes in code that result in changes in displayed content).
I guess this is not longer true with the new WYSIWYG included with 2.x.
We are looking for enjoying it.
you're right, the new GWT editor is really greater than the previous editor!
still some small bugs but really better!
for sure, this wouldn't be a problem ;)...
Imagine you have a project with a quotation of 1.000.000 mendays... you
find
1.000.000 people and in 1 day, you have your
solution :)
Wait! We must change a concept here! We can not use man-day. We could
use person-day or people-days! My wife is involved in genre equality
policies and teaches me on this issues.
You would be right in a humanistic world but in ours, companies policies
more and more teach me to speak about "cattle-days" :):)... and tell to your
wife not to care about equality because women or men are quite equal with
respect to this way of thinking: you're just a resource with a cost, nothing
less, nothing more ;)
Greetings!
Ricardo
--
Ricardo RodrÃguez
Your EPEC Network ICT Team
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs