Nice job!
my remarks:
- I think also the "recent changes" section is a bit "oversized"
compared to
the others sections because when you open the page, you only see this at
first sight.
- The number of items in recent changes should be reduced (it is already
possible as you said in a previous mail) so that the recent changes is not
too tall compared to Spaces+Tags and so that you can guess there are other
contents below recent changes without scrolling too much.
- Maybe default height for one recent change could be reduced a bit by
putting the name just beside the photo for example... I like this size of
photo...
- considering balance, I would prefer a smaller column for recent changes...
not 50/50 but 60/40 for example... this is a personal opinion :)
- I agree the avatar presentation brings something interesting.
Pascal
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Marta Girdea <marta.girdea(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jerome Velociter
<jerome(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Marta Girdea
<marta.girdea(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> This is starting to look really nice, I particularly like the fact
that
the
> recent changes are displayed in a more
comprehensive manner.
>
> I have a few comments though:
> 1/ The two columns look a bit unbalanced. Isn't there some other
important
> information the user would like to see on in
the dashboard, that could
fill
>> the empty space? Or maybe we could reduce the number of displayed
recent
>> changes?
> I think that the average wiki
contains more spaces than incubator (way
> more in some cases).
> You can try to reduce the number of items in recent changes by passing
> changesNb=15 in the URL (this variable can be set in the document
> too).
>> 2/ There are some scalability
problems: on the 'Recent changes'
column,
if
> the document name is long, 'see
modifications' that appears on hover
shows
>> up on the next row and pushes the rest of the content down, and this
is
not
>> pretty. What could be done is use an icon instead of text, and this
way
we'd
have
consistency with the 'Spaces' section.
It's not pretty but I've asked for feedback during the devel process
and since this onhover link vary a lot (link vs. ajax) between items
(page vs. comment) it seemed to be way more comprehensive to write it
and use visual hints (color + [+] and [-]) than to use images.
> 3/ I don't think the user's avatar is a crucial information to display
in
>> Recent changes. Also, too few or too many document changes per user
will
>
result in empty spaces. Maybe reducing the image's size would partly
solve
the
problem.
This is the first negative feedback about avatars, I agree it's not
crucial but it allow to put a face on changes which is a good thing I
think.
Yes, power to people! Avatars makes a big difference in the tool
adoption by its users, in my opinion. (And displaying it other places
than user own profile encourages people to actually upload their
picture).
I agree, that's why I didn't
suggest removing the avatars, just making them
smaller. This wasn't negative feedback on the avatars, but a comment on the
fact that they are way too visible comparing to the rest (at least on my
display).
> Jerome.
> > I'm afraid that a lot of
avatars will not look pretty with a height
> > smaller than 60px.
>
> > Thanks,
> > JV.
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > devs(a)xwiki.org
> >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs