21 Dec
2010
21 Dec
'10
11:23 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Anca Luca <lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 12/21/2010 10:25 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
No, it's not all or nothing. I'm not talking about the rest of the initial
proposal from march, just about the move of top level projects.
What I don't want to see is that we make the move for Watch now and that 6
months from now XEM is still in between both strategies (products vs.
extensions).
We only need to agree on that and for me it's OK. I'm even OK to help making
the move for manager if needed.
Jerome.
Hi all,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean
<jean-vincent(a)drean.org>wrote;wrote:
> +1,
>
> Note: this is in line with this proposal
> http://markmail.org/message/k6hb7v63igrbtxiy
It's actually a duplicate, thanks for pointing to this thread. I will
consider it voted, as the other mail shows, and implement it as soon as
I find the time.
I'm -0.5 if we do just that just for XWiki Watch and keep the status quo
for
other products (namely manager - maybe xeclipse
too).
Well here's how I see it: someone has to do it, and it has to start with
something. This mail was just to make sure that if I do this for watch,
we all agree this is what we want to do (because I overlooked the other
mail, where we had actually agreed on this).
In this context, -0.5 is a little strange because it sortof blocks
anything to happen unless it happens for everything. Shouldn't it be
good already that we do this for watch? Is it really an "all or
nothing", given the fact that the strategy was already applied for
workspaces and not for these other projects?
Thanks,
Anca
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
If we look at the original proposal from march, manager is in the same
boat.
And looking at facts, it is also on the
backburner (no roadmap, not
tested).
I'm OK if we implement the global strategy of moving those two top level
projects to extensions.
Jerome.
>
>
> JV.
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Anca Luca<lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> today XWiki Watch is a top level project, toplevel in the svn and
listed
>> on the main page of xwiki.org.
>>
>> I propose we downgrade it to extension status and move its code
>> appropriately, somewhere in the plugins and applications. Along with
>> this, the standalone distribution (and installers) would also be
removed.
>> The reason for this is that it makes more
sense as an extension than a
>> toplevel project (it's an extra feature that you can add to XWiki by
>> installing an application and deploying a couple of jars), and also
>> because it has been on the backburner lately, and there is no roadmap
to
make a fully featured toplevel product of it.
Also, according to this vote
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/scrwsfqfm6b5h5zf I would like to
release something from the current trunk (1.1M2 probably), compatible
with a latest XWiki.
I'm +1 for all these.
WYDT?
Thanks,
Anca
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs