10 Jan
2014
10 Jan
'14
9:46 a.m.
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project
name. I see 2 possible
names:
1) Activiti Application
2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
(after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
that,
for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
expectation
on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I
have heard
several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
very useful extension.
Cheers,
Clemens
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source
workflow execution engine. (
> http://activiti.org/)
>
> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
source
> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti
Application with the key
> ACTIVITI.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sorin B.
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs