2 Nov
2012
2 Nov
'12
4:03 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <guillaume(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi,
I agree that {{translation}} sounds more elegant.
By the way, how will the macro handle parameters within parameters? I
remember it was one of my big issues when adding keys, knowing when and how
to bundle 2 messages in one.
Not sure I understand what you mean. Would be nice if you could you provide
an example of the use case your are describing.
Guillaume
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com
used
wrote:
How about {{translation}} ?
+1 for {{translation}} if the behaviour is going to be the same as we to do with $msg.get(...), which is to get a
translation from a key.
Thanks,
Eduard
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
l10n is very cryptic and only developers will
know what it means.
Thanks,
Caty
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi devs,
Quick vote for the macro name:
* {{l10n}}
* {{locallization}}
localization is a bit too long for a macro so I would go for "l10n".
We can also decide to maintain both aliases.
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs