7 Oct
2015
7 Oct
'15
4:01 p.m.
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)cjdns.fr> wrote:
Hello folks, thank you very very much for taking the
time to rank these
next steps, this is most helpful for us in deciding what we will do.
1. I made a small change to the page, adding easy to remember names to
each feature, eg TABS, HIDE_EDIT_MODES, etc.
2. Vincent I removed your change from the HIDE_EDIT_MODES option because
it has not been universally agreed that it must work on mobile devices
and as it is not currently tested on such devices, making it work and/or
making sure it works is a task which requires effort like the rest so I
have added a new item, MOBILE_DEVICES to the list.
With this new item, perhaps people may want to re-evaluate your votes ?
I will propose we take the 2 highest voted options using the Condorcet
method and proceed to make mockups and user-stories for these, then we
may request more feedback and do another iteration.
Finally: Caty do you suppose you could do an analysis on this application
and provide us with usability feedback ? We are specifically interested to
know:
This would require some work from my part, so we might need to add it to
the roadmap.
When defining the AWM design I made this proposal in 2011
design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/ApplicationWithinMinutesPropos…
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/ApplicationWithinMinute…
which had the structure similar to an IDE.
A. How the application should be integrated in the
platform
(where you click to make it open)
The logical place to access the IDE would not be a self-contained
application, but something similar to an Edit mode.
I don't understand why you've used the View mode.
We should extend the content menus (especially the Edit one) and let the
IDE application add its access point in there.
We could place it near 'Edit objects' or 'Edit class' and maybe in the
future even replace those editors (if the quality will be high enough).
I also state again Vincent's point about declaring Syntax app as
dependency.
I wasn't able to edit a page I defined part of the project or not even
expand the side panel tree, but I guess this app is still in the early
versions.
Thanks,
Caty
B. What should be displayed in the side panel, what
should be available
to click on by a developer in the application.
Of course we also want to know anything else which comes to mind.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 06/10/15 20:59, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
I'm not sure about "it needs to work on
mobile". I don't see myself
developing applications from a mobile phone, not even from a tablet.
Great work so far!
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Yann Flory <yann.flory(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hello devs,
Recently, a new version of the XWebIDE (
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWebIDE+Application
)
has been published which added the ability to work with Nested spaces in
the application.
In order to progress with the development of the extension, we've made a
list of future relevant features to add to the application. We'd now like
to have your opinion about the importance of each one of them (order the
features based on their priority) and your ideas for new ones. You can
find
the list and add your vote in the table in the design wiki :
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWebIDE+Application+Improve…
We'd also like to know what are the required features which make you
believe you'll use the application in the future.
And feel free to provide any other feedback you may have about the
current
version of the XWebIDE application.
Thanks,
Yann
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________