30 May
2016
30 May
'16
1:19 p.m.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
vincent(a)massol.net>
You are talking about the folder here while the discussion is more
about the module name IMO. We could indeed start another discussion
about the folder name but I don't think we should mix.
So you did prefixed all submodule with top level id too :)
Indeed, if this is about the Maven (sub-)module name then yes, I agree that
we should use the naming convention we currently have in platform.
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> On 28 May 2016, at 15:06, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 28 May 2016, at 15:02, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> >> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol < > wrote:
> >>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there are
> some guidelines here:
> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename
> >>>>
> >>>> For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>.
> >>>>
> >>>> I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should be
> renamed authenticator-android IMO.
> >>>
> >>> It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and
> >>> implementing Android authentication API, so very different from
other
> >>> authenticator-* which are
authenticator you install in XWiki.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regarding https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to decide
> what to do on 2 aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just
serves
as an
examle for the generic discussion):
>>>
>>> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub
modules? Just use the concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should be
define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or “other-oidc” or something else. I
think just the concept name is ok. WDYT?
>
> Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about
> prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't indicate
anything.
>
>>>
>>> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and
odic-provider. Should this be named authenticator-odic and provider-odic
instead to be in sync with
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename. I think
so. WDYT?
>
> I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id
> naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change
> the ids of most of the platform modules…
Contrib don’t have the same naming at all than xwiki github org.
For xwiki github org we have: xwiki-<module>-<submodules>
For contrib github org we have: <type>-<module>-<submodules>
We can reconcile this FTM by saying that the
naming rule of
<type>-<module>- is only for the top level name. And submodules always
follow the rule of <topmodulename>-<submodule>.
Repeating the top module name is redundant IMO, that's why I've used
application-ckeditor/ui and application-filemanager/api
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-ckeditor
A related discussion
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Remove-all-duplicated-information-fr…
Thanks,
Marius
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Thanks
-Vincent
>
>>>
>>> See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs