Le 16 févr. 2012 18:38, "Eduard Moraru" <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi devs,
Based on the work done by Anca and Sorin doring the XWiki 2011 Seminar
Hackaton, I`ve made the following pull request [1] to integrate their work
with minor changes.
A summary of the changes contained by the pull request are described in
the
jira issue [2].
The problem at the current stage, as Jerome also hinted, is that we need
to
do a migration script to make the existing annotations
(in an upgrade
scenario) use the XWikiComments class instead so that they can be picked
up
by commentsinline.vm. However, this might lose the
possibility to provide
custom annotations.
An alternative would be to make commentsinline.vm use the annotation
service and handle and retrieve both Annotation and XWikiComment objects.
This way, the current annotations should need no migration script since
they are using a class configured in the AnnotationConfig page that the
annotation service knows how to handle.
WDYT?
I'm tending to prefer a proper migration. I've played in the past with
aggregation of both classes on a small "recent reviews" macro, and I recall
some (non-trivial) HQL queries were a pain to write, when doable in a
single query at all. I can look for specific examples if needed.
I fear that if we let both classes live together, some potential future UI
or service or whatever that exposes boths in a unified manner might be
harder to implement.
Jérôme