28 Apr
2011
28 Apr
'11
4:51 p.m.
which option are you +1 for?
"none of the above" isn't really an option unless you have a plan.
Caleb
On 04/28/2011 10:37 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 16:36, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
-0
(was -0 for 1)
pretty much the same comments as Vincent. Without talking about false
positive there is real bug here and since there is tests to catch them
people should look at them sometimes...
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:40, Caleb James DeLisle
<calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
I offered to take over the release since Jerome
was unable to do it and right now we have 38 test
failures.
16 selenium1 tests,
6 selenium2/ui-tests
16 webstandards tests.
We have 3 options:
1. We can release now and accept bugs in the release.
2. We can have volunteers to take over tests and get them passing for tomorrow so
tomorrow I can
release.
3. We can opt to postpone the release. If I work on these alone I expect it to take about
1 week as
long as nobody commits code which introduces further regressions.
I don't think postponing the release is wise at this point and #2 is contingent upon
volunteers
claiming ownership of specific tests so I think #1 is the lesser of the evils.
Do I hear any objections/volunteers?
Caleb
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne