30 Jul
2015
30 Jul
'15
3:29 p.m.
Hi,
Some summary of the expressed opinions:
Sol1: -0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty)
Sol2: -0 (GD), -1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty)
Sol3: +0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty)
Sol4: -1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), -1 (Caty)
Sol5: +1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), +1 (Gabi), +0 (Caty), +1 (Eduard)
Sol6: +0 (GD), +0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty)
So currently the proposal that have the most positive feedback are: Sol5
and Sol6.
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for 5 for reasons already mentioned and because I
find it to be the most
natural.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Gabriela Smeria <gabriela.smeria(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for your effort, Caty!
> - Solution1: I think in order to
see the tree, there are required a
> minimum number of clicks and this solution clearly doesn’t cover this
> condition
> - Solution2: it seems a bit hidden, IMO and also too many clicks, as
> Sol1
> - Solution3: is a very good idea, but is not sufficient and also a bit
> hidden
> - Solution4: is too crowded, IMO a breadcrumb should be as simpler as
it
> As a conclusion, my choice will be a
combination between 3 and 5, or 5
and
> 6.
> Thanks,
> Gabriela
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
can be
- Solution5: this is the best solution from my point of view, because
it
> also preserves the old breadcrumb and it adds a new element, with a
> “home”
> icon which I think is intuitive enough
> - Solution6: same as Sol3 - really nice to have, but not sufficient