24 Aug
2008
24 Aug
'08
1:11 a.m.
On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Ok then it means I was looking at code that uses the old rendering I
guess. Should we keep this code? Or did we all agree to drop it and
focus on the new rendering only? (I think that's what we agreed on).
If that's the case then we should clean the code and remove the
support for the old renderer I guess.
WDYT?
Right. Monday morning the Radeox-based XHTMLConverter will be dropped. I
will also refactor my XxxImpl classes to DefaultXxx to meet the naming
conventions.
Thanks,
Marius
Hi
Marius,
Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on
last
Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is thus
out of sync with the renderer. For example:
The WYSIWYG editor doesn't use internally the XWiki syntax. It has
HTML as
input and outputs also HTML. The conversion to and from XWiki syntax
is
done here: http://tinyurl.com/5mwjq6 . So as long as
xwiki-core-rendering-1.6*.jar is in the class path it must be the
latest
version of the renderer that it is used to make the conversion.
Thanks
-Vincent
If you look at XWikiXHTMLConverter#fromXHTML method, the XWiki
syntax is
not specified. I suspect it gets defaulted to version 1.0.
> * Bold is **bold**, not *bold*
> * Macros use 2 curly braces
> * etc
>
> We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need to
> release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but
> easy stuff like this should work).
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs