22 Jan
2010
22 Jan
'10
9:10 p.m.
My registration template provides the option of client side validation using the
LiveValidate library. In order to turn this functionality on by default we would
have to bundle the library with XWiki. The library is licensed under the MIT
license: http://livevalidation.com/license and weighs in at 12.5KB when minified.
I would like to add:
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_prototype.compressed.js
and a stylesheet which was posted to the incubator by Jerome Velociter
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_style.css
Caleb James DeLisle
22 Jan
22 Jan
9:12 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Add LiveValidate Javascript library for validating form fields.
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
My registration template provides the option of client
side validation using the
LiveValidate library. In order to turn this functionality on by default we would
have to bundle the library with XWiki. The library is licensed under the MIT
license: http://livevalidation.com/license and weighs in at 12.5KB when minified.
I would like to add:
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_prototype.compressed.js
and a stylesheet which was posted to the incubator by Jerome Velociter
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_style.css
Would the loading of live validation be conditional using jsx (ie not loaded by default
for all pages)?
I have no knowledge of JS validation libraries so I'll trust the experts.
Thanks
-Vincent
9:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Add LiveValidate Javascript library for validating form fields.
I cant't look at the tool in question right now but its place is not
under YUI in our resources, it should have is own
/resources/js/livevalidation/ directory imho.
JV.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Caleb James DeLisle
<calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
My registration template provides the option of client
side validation using the
LiveValidate library. In order to turn this functionality on by default we would
have to bundle the library with XWiki. The library is licensed under the MIT
license: http://livevalidation.com/license and weighs in at 12.5KB when minified.
I would like to add:
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_prototype.compressed.js
and a stylesheet which was posted to the incubator by Jerome Velociter
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_style.css
Caleb James DeLisle
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9:29 p.m.
/yui/ == my mistake not knowing it's a framework.
/resources/js/livevalidation/ it is.
"
Would the loading of live validation be conditional using jsx (ie not loaded by default
for all pages)?
I have no knowledge of JS validation libraries so I'll trust the experts.
Thanks
-Vincent
"
Yes, conditional loading with jsx.
Caleb
Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
I cant't look at the tool in question right now
but its place is not
under YUI in our resources, it should have is own
/resources/js/livevalidation/ directory imho.
JV.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Caleb James DeLisle
<calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
My registration template provides the option of
client side validation using the
LiveValidate library. In order to turn this functionality on by default we would
have to bundle the library with XWiki. The library is licensed under the MIT
license: http://livevalidation.com/license and weighs in at 12.5KB when minified.
I would like to add:
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_prototype.compressed.js
and a stylesheet which was posted to the incubator by Jerome Velociter
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_style.css
Caleb James DeLisle
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:22 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Add LiveValidate Javascript library for validating form fields.
Hi devs, Hi Caleb
Why not create a LiveValidation Application before adding it to the core?
Also there are some leftovers in resources like YUI at an obsolete
version... and one more thing, i found nothing about their(LiveValidation)
bugs management. Maybe we should think about this, and if the LiveValidation
Application with this javascript library becomes mature/tested and has an
maintainer could go into XWiki Core.
Thanks, this is my view on this.
Flavius Olaru
11:47 p.m.
Flavius Olaru wrote:
Hi devs, Hi Caleb
Why not create a LiveValidation Application before adding it to the core?
There is
an application here:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/LiveValidation
The idea of a template (registerinline.vm) calling an application seems
backward to me.
Also there are some leftovers in resources like YUI at
an obsolete
version...
It was my mistake proposing it go in the yui folder, It doesn't
depend on yui
so it should be in it's own folder.
and one more thing, i found nothing about
their(LiveValidation)
bugs management.
You make a very good point. I think it's also important to
note that the
code is under 900 lines fully documented, it contains 1200 lines of unit
tests, it will only be used on pages which call it via jsfx.use and
it is not intended for security as nefarious users may simply turn off
javascript.
Maybe we should think about this, and if the
LiveValidation
Application with this javascript library becomes mature/tested and has an
maintainer could go into XWiki Core.
Thanks, this is my view on this.
Flavius Olaru
I appreciate your input.
Caleb
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
23 Jan
23 Jan
1:59 a.m.
On 01/22/2010 11:47 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
I prefer something like resources/uicomponents/widgets/validation/
We have other small "tools" that don't have a community and advanced
stuff like version control, tracker and mailing lists. IMO, this is
normal, and acceptable. Such a tool usually has less than 1k likes of
code, so there's not much to maintain. If there are bugs or
compatibility issues, a mail to the author with either a bugfix request
or a patch should be enough.
But yes, the bug management question is a very good one, and one we
usually consider for larger libraries/tools.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Flavius Olaru wrote:
I second Caleb, this is a functionality used by other applications and
even platform elements, so it should also be in the platform.
Hi devs, Hi Caleb
Why not create a LiveValidation Application before adding it to the core?
There is
an application here:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/LiveValidation
The idea of a template (registerinline.vm) calling an application seems
backward to me. Also there are
some leftovers in resources like YUI at an obsolete
version...
It was my mistake proposing it go in the yui folder, It doesn't
depend on yui
so it should be in it's own folder. and one more
thing, i found nothing about their(LiveValidation)
bugs management.
You make a very good point. I think it's also important to
note that the
code is under 900 lines fully documented, it contains 1200 lines of unit
tests, it will only be used on pages which call it via jsfx.use and
it is not intended for security as nefarious users may simply turn off
javascript. Maybe we
should think about this, and if the LiveValidation
Application with this javascript library becomes mature/tested and has an
maintainer could go into XWiki Core.
Thanks, this is my view on this.
Flavius Olaru
I appreciate your input.
Caleb
3:12 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Add LiveValidate Javascript library for validating form fields.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
yui
What about "resources/uicomponents/widgets/livevalidation/" ?
We have other small "tools" that don't have a community and advanced
stuff like version control, tracker and mailing lists. IMO, this is
normal, and acceptable. Such a tool usually has less than 1k likes of
code, so there's not much to maintain. If there are bugs or
compatibility issues, a mail to the author with either a bugfix request
or a patch should be enough.
But yes, the bug management question is a very good one, and one we
usually consider for larger libraries/tools.
I took the time and tested it on Windows with their tests page.
Firefox 3.5, MSIE 6, 7, 8, Google Chrome and Safari: All tests passed... a
good thing. :)
Opera 10: 51 tests, 184 assertions, 45 failures, 0 errors (I've submitted
them the tests results)
http://livevalidation.com/testprototype
Maybe if someone has the time to check it on Mac and Linux and post here if
the findings would be great.
I also found a fork on github, it has some few more lines than the original
library and is versioned as 1.4 as opposed the original at 1.3. Maybe when i
get the time i will have a better look on that.
http://github.com/grockit/livevalidation
--
Flavius Olaru
On 01/22/2010 11:47 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
I am not against adding a javascript library that is required by the
platform or other applications, the fact that this library had a missing
transparent bugs/issues management raised some questions.
Flavius Olaru wrote:
> Hi devs, Hi Caleb
>
> Why not create a LiveValidation Application before adding it to the
core?
There is an application here:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/LiveValidation
The idea of a template (registerinline.vm) calling an application seems
backward to me.
I second Caleb, this is a functionality used by other applications and
even platform elements, so it should also be in the platform.
Also
there are some leftovers in resources like YUI at an obsolete
version...
It was my mistake proposing it go in the yui folder, It doesn't
depend on so it should be in it's own folder.
I prefer something like resources/uicomponents/widgets/validation/
and one more thing, i found nothing about
their(LiveValidation)
bugs management.
You make a very good point. I think it's also important to
note that the
code is under 900 lines fully documented, it contains 1200 lines of unit
tests, it will only be used on pages which call it via jsfx.use and
it is not intended for security as nefarious users may simply turn off
javascript.
3:03 a.m.
On 01/22/2010 09:10 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
My registration template provides the option of client
side validation using the
LiveValidate library. In order to turn this functionality on by default we would
have to bundle the library with XWiki. The library is licensed under the MIT
license: http://livevalidation.com/license and weighs in at 12.5KB when minified.
I would like to add:
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_prototype.compressed.js
and a stylesheet which was posted to the incubator by Jerome Velociter
resources/js/yui/livevalidation/livevalidation_style.css
+1, but under resources/uicomponents/widgets/validation/ or
resources/uicomponents/validation/
Also, I'd like to include the uncompressed version as well in the
sources, or even include only the uncompressed version and let the build
minify it.
As the next step, it would be nice to have it wired to the validation
fields in XClasses, so that it works automatically.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
3:15 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Add LiveValidate Javascript library for validating form fields.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Also, I'd like to include the uncompressed version as well in the
sources, or even include only the uncompressed version and let the build
minify it.
+1 for including the uncompressed version in sources
As the next step, it would be nice to have it wired to the validation
fields in XClasses, so that it works automatically.
+1 Or at least creating a macro that uses the validation fields in XClasses.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Flavius Olaru
3:51 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Add LiveValidate Javascript library for validating form fields.
On testing I would like to add:
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.01
51 tests, 184 assertions, 45 failures, 0 errors
while...
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10
51 tests, 229 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
This seems good.
--
Flavius Olaru
11:51 a.m.
On 01/23/2010 03:51 AM, Flavius Olaru wrote:
On testing I would like to add:
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.01
51 tests, 184 assertions, 45 failures, 0 errors
while...
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10
51 tests, 229 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
This seems good.
Passes on Opera 10.10/Linux.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
2:50 p.m.
Passes unit tests in Firefox 3.0.1 Linux
must update :)
Caleb
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 01/23/2010 03:51 AM, Flavius Olaru wrote:
On testing I would like to add:
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.01
51 tests, 184 assertions, 45 failures, 0 errors
while...
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10
51 tests, 229 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
This seems good.
Passes on Opera 10.10/Linux.
24 Jan
24 Jan
5:06 p.m.
Added to web/standard/src/main/webapp/resources/uicomponents/widgets/validation
commit 26331
see:
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4786
Unit tests still work in Linux Firefox 3.10 and Opera 9.64 after being
minified at build time.
Caleb
Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
Passes unit tests in Firefox 3.0.1 Linux
must update :)
Caleb
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 01/23/2010 03:51 AM, Flavius Olaru wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On testing I would like to add:
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.01
51 tests, 184 assertions, 45 failures, 0 errors
while...
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10
51 tests, 229 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
This seems good.
Passes on Opera 10.10/Linux.
5352
days inactive
5354
days old
13 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Flavius Olaru -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol