Hi,
I'm using workspaces 1.2M1 as a virtual xwiki under xem 1.3. I have
configured the XWikiServerClass object under XWikiServerServername to
have the visibility property set to 'Private'. When I look at
XWikiPreferences in the virtual xwiki, there are XWikiGlobalRights
objects configured Deny, Groups:,Levels:Register,Users:XWikiGuest, and
Deny, Groups:XWikiAllGroup, Levels: edit, register, Users:
The registration form still appears on the login page, and upon
filling in the fields and submitting, registration is successful.
I need to not allow registration by anyone except Admin.
Thanks,
Dan Svoboda
Navigating to the Main.LuceneSearch page brings up the following error?
Failed to execute macro: velocity
org.xwiki.rendering.macro.MacroExecutionException: Failed to evaluate Velocity Macro for content [$xwiki.jsfx.use("uicomponents/search/search.js", true)##
$xwiki.ssfx.use("uicomponents/search/search.css", true)##
The page has worked, but what can be wrong now.
The page itself is not changed from the distribution?
Gerritjan
I really love the look and use of the xwiki products, but the lack of
documentation and broken functionality is very frustrating. After finally
getting smtp authorisation working in Enterprize I find the email which is
generated is not forming URLs properly - grrr.
So now I'm back to exploring Workspaces milestone 1.2 and I have found that
setting Public Registration to Allow or Deny makes no difference -
registration is just a matter of supplying a name and email address and
you're in. No admin approval required. This is not acceptable for an admin
setup intended for staff only.
Can anyone explain to me how this might be fixed please?
Cheers
Chris Ellis
Lorne-Aireys Inlet P-12 College
Hello,
sometimes after inserting Links in the WYSIWYG-Editor and saving the
Document,
mistakes occur on the site.
Example before:
Nach einer korrekten [[Benutzeranmeldung am
WebClient>>BenutzeranmeldungAmWebClient]] einschließlich einer
Autorisierungsprozedur hat der ...
Example with mistake:
Nach einer korrekten
org.xwiki.gwt.dom.client.Element#placeholder[[BenutzeranmeldungAmWebClient]][[">Benutzeranmeldung
am WebClient>>/xwiki/bin/view/CSC_AfTD_Hilfe/BenutzeranmeldungAmWebClient]]
einschließlich einer Autorisierungsprozedur hat der ...
I hope that you can help me soon.
Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishes
Norbert
[Germany]
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Problems-with-links-tp4435123p4435123.html
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the following 2 questions:
1) who "owns" it and thus "controls" (or rather provides direction
for) its content
2) can it be used for business advertising (support, paid packages,
consulting services)
Bit of History about XWiki SAS
========================
- XWiki SAS (http://xwiki.com) is the company founded by Ludovic
Dubost the creator of XWiki (I'm the CTO of XWiki SAS in addition to
being a committer here).
- Most of the active contributors are also employed and paid by XWiki
SAS to develop the XWiki software. Today that's
-- 12.5 committers (developers)
-- 1 open source product manager (see http://markmail.org/thread/ggaaw4u6yyci4oan
for its definition)
-- 1 designer
-- 1 tester/technical writer
- XWiki SAS sells services around the open source software, see http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Services/
- XWiki SAS truly believes and understands open source, see http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/About/Values
-- I also wrote a blog post on this some time back: http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/XWikiSASAndOpenSource
- XWiki SAS has promised "not to do evil" ;), see its manifesto at http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/About/Manifesto
- XWiki SAS is paying for the servers and maintenance of xwiki.org,
myxwiki.org, the maven repo, the svn repo, the hudson build serversn
the free JUG farm, and more
Issue at hand
===========
XWiki SAS would like to generate more revenue to be able to increase
the development pace of the XWiki software. We'd like to fund even
more the development of XWiki, so that it becomes an even better
product. We've asked you what you'd like to see in the future in XWiki
and you've answered on this survey result:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Features+Survey+Results
We'd like to implement those features as fast as possible.
For this we need to ensure that users interested in commercial
services find easily the way to http://xwiki.com, even when they
arrive on xwiki.org.
This is true for XWiki SAS's services but also for any company willing
to offer services around the XWiki open source project. There's no
magic. Developers need to be paid when they work full time on some
project. We need a commercial ecosystem around XWiki for it to
progress as quickly as its competitors (the collaboration market). We
need to allow for commercial companies the ability to generate revenue
from their work on the XWiki open source project. However we also want
to continue ensuring that all the XWiki development is done in open
source, under a LGPL license.
Governance Proposal
=================
1) xwiki.org is controlled by the XWiki committers. This means that
important changes brought to it should be discussed/vote on the list,
using the same practices as for code commits
2) xwiki.org stays open in edit mode to all external contributors (and
XWiki committers continue to monitor it to remove spam, etc)
3) we agree to start with 3 zones where companies can advertise their
commercial offers on top of the XWiki open source product:
-- On the download page (for business packages, subscriptions, hosting)
-- On the support page (for services: support, consulting)
-- (still to be defined) Possibly on a "Products" tab in the new
horizontal navigation. The idea would be to do as jboss.org is doing.
Projects are open source and community and Products are commercial
4) the company offerings are listed by their amount of contributions
to the XWiki open source project. The company that contributes most
(XWiki SAS today) gets the best spots (top of the list, bigger space)
5) Companies who want to be listed should provide some proof of their
contributions to the XWiki open source project
6) XWiki SAS gets some acknowledgment for paying for the xwiki.org
server/maintenance of it. Probably somewhere in the footer of the site
or on side panel somewhere
7) xwiki.org should always remain a site for the xwiki open source
community
Conclusion
=========
We want to stress that this proposal is not about XWiki SAS making a
commercial takeover of the xwiki.org site.
It's about recognizing that if the XWiki open source software
progresses quickly today, it's thanks to contributors but also for a
very large proportion to companies paying developers to work on it,
either directly (like XWiki SAS or other companies that have
developers contributing) or indirectly (by paying for example XWiki
SAS or other companies to work on specific features).
It's also about recognizing that XWiki SAS is happy to see other
companies willing to contribute to the progress of the XWiki open
source project and thus to provide a place for these companies to be
visible too.
I hope that all our contributors but also users of the XWiki Open
Source software will find this proposal acceptable and I welcome any
feedback on it.
Thanks
-Vincent Massol
Hat 1: XWiki SAS CTO
Hat 2: XWiki committer
Hello
I've translated WYSIWYG editor's Strings.properties file into my language.
Then I've putted it into place ( .../wysiwyg/client/editor) with name
Strings_sk.properties but editor is still in English.
What I am doing wrong?
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/WYSIWYG-editor-language-in-user-interface-tp4440246p44…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to remove the comments, attachments, history and information tabs from certain pages. Perhaps just by inserting some css or javascript on the pages where I don't want these things to show.
Also, I was hoping to reduce the font size of the "Create New Post" text in the blog (I'm using the toucan skin if that helps). Which file would I look in do to this?
Any help here would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Josh
_________________________________________________________________
Find out what’s new with your friends Download the new Windows Live Messenger
http://download.live.com/
Hello,
I still have issues with livetables ... I'm willing to investigate, but a
little help would be appreciated :)
I'm basically wanting to show 2 fields of a custom class of mine. There are
some hundreds of objects of this kind in my wiki.
So I add the following in a page in 2.0 syntax
{{velocity}}
#set($collist = [ "subject", "startdate"])
#set($colprops = {
"subject" : { "type" : "text" , "link":"view", "size" :
50, "filterable": true, "sortable":true},
"startdate" : { "type" : "text", "filterable":false,
"sortable":true}
})
#set($options = { "className":"My.Class",
"tagCloud":true,
"rowCount": 10 })
#livetable("myclass" $collist $colprops $options)
{{/velocity}}
This results in an empty array displayed ... If I filter by typing 3 to 4
letters of an existing "subject", then SOMETIMES, it displays the related
objects, but not always. Result is identical if I put the velocity part in
1.0 syntax page. Tried to play and remove most of the fields options, still
the same behaviour.
I have retrieved the URL that generates the JSON data from the logs, put it
in my browser, and it generates some JSON with 10 elements, as expected.
There was an exception on date formatting though, so I removed the
"startdate" field from the list, but still the same behaviour.
How could I investigate this issue ? Do you think it might be related to my
installation ? Because all other livetables in the wiki work well, except
some of them that are linked to custom classes (alldocs works pretty well).
Could it be some special characters in "subject" text ? ('/', '[', ... ?)
I'm on xwiki 2.2-RC2, tomcat 6, linux RH4.
Thanks for help,
Jeremie
Hi,
I have some question about translation.
1. Is the ApplicationResources_zh.properties exported from
l10i.xwiki.org? But I find the resources file in xwiki 2.2.1 release
package is not the same as the resource file I get from
l10i.xwiki.org.
2. I think the (Total translations = Empty translations + Outdated
translations + Translations to review), but in the site I found it is
not equal all the time, for example,
Simplified Chinese (zh),
Total translations: 2425
Empty translations: 477
Outdated translations: 29
Translations to review: 1454
477 + 29 + 1454 = 1960 != 2425. Does this mean the missing 465 items
are Validated? What is the relationship between total empty and
outdate translations.
3. If I want to improve the translation. Do I modify the resource file
and submit a patch or I just edit l10i.xwiki.org.
Thanks.
Wang Ning