Ok, sorry that for the misunderstanding on both sides
:)
But I'm nevertheless not agree with Sergiu (but that doesn't
matter). I'll try to figure out how to do a running installation and
then I'll write a complete A-Z Howto for a Xwiki-Installation (for
my chosen apps/OS) and post it afterwards under
Xwiki.org.
That's great news! Ping us when you're ready to write it so that we
can work together where to best place it on
for max effect
and to prevent duplication of information with existing info there
(this is important since duplication means both maintenance and out of
sync info).
Cheers,
-Vincent
On Jan 22, 2008 2:38 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:57 PM, justanotheradress(a)gmail.com
<mailto: justanotheradress(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 11:40 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net
> <mailto: vincent(a)massol.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> then you shouldn't try to install it!
>
> You could use an already setup xwiki farm instead.
>
> -Vincent
> <http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs>
>
>
> Boah, that's a bit harsh, don't you think? It's like the old Linux
> developer behavior. I like to play with new technology, but I'm
not a
> developer. I'm just a student who spend
some spare time on IT-
topics.
> I do that because it's fun for me and
because I think, when I'm
> becoming a manager in a company, I understand the IT guys better
and
that
helps both sides. You on the other hand tell me I shouldn't do
that. Thanks a lot.
No, no you've misunderstood me :)
You were saying in your emails that you didn't want to try
installing
xwiki and that you wanted to pay someone to do it
for you. Hence my
suggestion to use an already installed version for testing/using
XWiki
(i.e. a farm install like netcipia, the pro
xwiki.com farm, etc).
I'm more than happy that you install it, actually I even prefer
that. If
you follow this list archive you'll see
we've always been
supportive and
answered questions from people trying to install
it. However since
people are going to donate their time to help you, all we ask is
that in
return you help the project in some way. For
example you can do
this by
improving the documentation or by writing a
tutorial for newbie,
etc.
I think our misunderstanding came from the email I saw from you
where
you stated that you were not technical and that
you wanted someone
to do
the install for you..
XWiki is very easy to install. Takes less than 10 seconds if you
follow
the packaged distribution. Now if you want to do
fancy things
(which you
said you wanted to do) it's another matter
which is btw completely
separate from XWiki (Apache has nothing to do with xwiki, same as
configuring your OS, knowing how to install a specific database,
etc).
I second that. All you need to know about configuring XWiki so that it
works behind httpd and tomcat is already documented. Setting up httpd,
tomcat and the link between them (mod_proxy or mod_jk) is NOT
something
XWiki must document. For example, the documentation for a game should
contain information about installing Windows, DirectX, drivers for the
video card, where to get a joystick from and how to install such a
device? I say no. The same is true here. XWiki is a web application,
comes packaged as a .war, and it is installed as any other .war.
Sergiu
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>> Thanks to the Howtos on
www.Howtoforge.com <http://www.Howtoforge.com
>> I'm running a secured
dedicated Debian server with fully automated
>> backup jobs, firewall and so forth and I'm not even a "real"
Linux
>> freak. I was able to run a CMS with a forum, over 400 active
members
> and over 1 Terabyte traffic a month (in 2
years, my server was
not one
> time down). So what's the point?
Technology is only for guys who
> studied it? Well, I thought technology is only as good as ppl can
use
> it. Right now you think XWIKI is only good to
use it as a user,
but I
> believe with a little bit more polished
documentation, advanced
users
> (I'm not talking about my grandma) could
(I'm not saying they
have to)
>> be able to install it by themself. That's all I was asking (not
>> demanding, that's a big difference!) for.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs