-Eduard
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for proposal 2, convinced by the Edy's
arguments.
2015-10-27 7:26 GMT+01:00 Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > It would be really nice to get some more feedback on this, since we
>> need it
>> > for 7.3M2 (to fix the failing tests).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Eduard
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Eduard Moraru <
enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 for extracting it. We currently need this in the administration
>> module,
>> >> for the template provider UI.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> IMO, xwiki-platform-tree is basically about the tree widget...
almost
>
>> nothing to do with XWiki's data model. In my eyes, this looks like
the
> >> technology, not the domain.
> >>
> >> xwiki-platform-index makes much more sense to me, since it defines
the
> >> domain, which can present an index
of documents using various
> technologies:
> >> livetable (documents), tree (documentTree), intepretive dance, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 for proposal 2 (since we agreed that we were grouping modules by
> domain
> >> and not by technology).
>
> My preference goes to proposal 2 with the same feeling already exposed
by
Renaming the current 3 modules in xwiki-platform-tree in
xwiki-platform-tree-generic-* doesn't sound right: "generic" feels
redundant in the name. I don't have a better proposal than 2.
Thanks,
Marius
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Eduard
> >>
> >>
> >> P.S.: We could also extract an xwiki-platform-index-livetable (or
> >> something with -macro-document if we want to make it about the name
of
>> the
>> >> macro instead of the presentation technology) for the Documents
macro
>> (XWiki.DocumentsMacro), currently also
bundled in index-ui.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <
vincent(a)massol.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> I see that the DocumentTree macro is used more and more in several
places
>>> (as it should) and I’d like to propose to extract the DocumentTree
macro
>>> from the Index App.
>>>
>>> Proposal 1:
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> xwiki-platform-tree
>>> |_ xwiki-platform-tree-generic
>>> |_ ...
>>> |_ xwiki-platform-tree-document
>>> |_ ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposal 2:
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> xwiki-platform-index
>>> |_ xwiki-platform-index-ui
>>> |_ xwiki-plarform-index-tree
>>> |_ …
>>>
>>> WDYT? Any other proposal?
>>>
>>> Personally I prefer proposal 1.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devs mailing list
>>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>>>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs