17 Feb
2011
17 Feb
'11
1:32 p.m.
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a period of 1 year
(rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
This notion can be useful on:
* the hall of fame page
* the new download page where companies can list their number of active committers
Thanks
-Vincent
17 Feb
17 Feb
1:38 p.m.
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1 year (rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still active
(given my status is a bit special)?
Guillaume
This notion can be useful on:
* the hall of fame page
* the new download page where companies can list their number of active
committers
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:48 p.m.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a period of 1 year
(rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still active (given my
status is a bit special)?
You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
You tell us how you want to be considered.
Thanks
-Vincent
Guillaume
This notion can be useful on:
* the hall of fame page
* the new download page where companies can list their number of active committers
Thanks
-Vincent
2:07 p.m.
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:48, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Is that so? I see that my role is defined as:
"* Monitoring the lists for users requests/needs
* Talking to people who implement XWiki out there in the wild, in companies
and see what their needs are * Monitoring the enterprise wiki landscape for
new features we should have * Comparing XWiki with other wiki engines out
there
Guillaume should provide us devs with visibility on the most wanted
features and help us prepare our roadmaps."
I'm still actively doing the first 3 so I'm not sure how/when this stopped
being my role.
Guillaume
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1
year (rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still
active
(given my status is a bit special)?
You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
You tell us how you want to be considered.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Sales - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Office: +33 1 45 42 40 90
Mobile: +33 6 10 79 76 70
Guillaume
This notion can be useful on:
* the hall of fame page
* the new download page where companies can list their number of active
committers
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:24 p.m.
Hi Guillaume,
On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:48, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Links please. I don't recall any recent posting from you on the points you listed
above... :)
Thanks
-Vincent
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Is that so? I see that my role is defined as:
"* Monitoring the lists for users requests/needs
* Talking to people who implement XWiki out there in the wild, in companies
and see what their needs are * Monitoring the enterprise wiki landscape for
new features we should have * Comparing XWiki with other wiki engines out
there
Guillaume should provide us devs with visibility on the most wanted
features and help us prepare our roadmaps."
I'm still actively doing the first 3 so I'm not sure how/when this stopped
being my role. Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1
year (rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still
active
(given my status is a bit special)?
You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
Guillaume
> You tell us how you want to be considered.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Guillaume
>>
>> This notion can be useful on:
>> * the hall of fame page
>> * the new download page where companies can list their number of active
> committers
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
2:27 p.m.
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:24, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
companies
Indeed. Maybe it would be better to switch me to a "retired" /
"emeritus"
status or something similar then?
Guillaume
Thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:48, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Is that so? I see that my role is defined as:
"* Monitoring the lists for users requests/needs
* Talking to people who implement XWiki out there in the wild, in Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1
year (rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still
active
(given my status is a bit special)?
You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
and see what their needs are * Monitoring the
enterprise wiki landscape
for
new features we should have * Comparing XWiki
with other wiki engines out
there
Guillaume should provide us devs with visibility on the most wanted
features and help us prepare our roadmaps."
I'm still actively doing the first 3 so I'm not sure how/when this
stopped
being my role.
Links please. I don't recall any recent posting from you on the points you
listed above... :)
-Vincent
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Sales - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Office: +33 1 45 42 40 90
Mobile: +33 6 10 79 76 70
Guillaume
> You tell us how you want to be considered.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Guillaume
>>
>> This notion can be useful on:
>> * the hall of fame page
>> * the new download page where companies can list their number of active
> committers
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:29 p.m.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:24, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Done, see http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/HallOfFame
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: For full transparency, I discussed with Guillaume offline about this and we agreed
that he should be Emeritus.
Hi Guillaume,
On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
companies
Indeed. Maybe it would be better to switch me to a "retired" /
"emeritus"
status or something similar then? Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:48, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
>
> Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1 year (rolling period).
>
> We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
>
> Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
>
> Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still
active (given my status is a bit special)?
You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
Is that so? I see that my role is defined as:
"* Monitoring the lists for users requests/needs
* Talking to people who implement XWiki out there in the wild, in and see what their needs are * Monitoring the
enterprise wiki landscape
for
new features we should have * Comparing XWiki
with other wiki engines out
there
Guillaume should provide us devs with visibility on the most wanted
features and help us prepare our roadmaps."
I'm still actively doing the first 3 so I'm not sure how/when this
stopped
being my role.
Links please. I don't recall any recent posting from you on the points you
listed above... :)
Guillaume
Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Guillaume
>>
>>
>>> You tell us how you want to be considered.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>> Guillaume
>>>>
>>>> This notion can be useful on:
>>>> * the hall of fame page
>>>> * the new download page where companies can list their number of active
>>> committers
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
3:11 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1 year (rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
I do not really disagree, but I do not remember that discussion, any pointer
?
I thought initially that active committers where active until they are
emeritus, and the switch is done by proposal and discussion with the
concerned committer. I probably repeat myself, but there is many ways to
contributes, other than purely doing a commit. Even if I do not want to
plead for myself in particular here, my recent works on xwiki-store with
Caleb is a good example, no commit from me, but surely a real participation
in Caleb's commits.
Moreover, as you have said before, actively participating is not always
easy, in particular in these days, and I try to still actively participate,
while focusing on points that I know well or matters most for us since I
have no time for more currently. I really wish to be able to do more.
Denis
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
This notion can be useful on:
* the hall of fame page
* the new download page where companies can list their number of active
committers
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
3:17 p.m.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
We're talking about Committers here, not contribution. You don't need to be
committer to participate and contribute.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi guys,
I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1 year (rolling period).
We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
I do not really disagree, but I do not remember that discussion, any pointer
?
I thought initially that active committers where active until they are
emeritus, and the switch is done by proposal and discussion with the
concerned committer. I probably repeat myself, but there is many ways to
contributes, other than purely doing a commit. Even if I do not want to
plead for myself in particular here, my recent works on xwiki-store with
Caleb is a good example, no commit from me, but surely a real participation
in Caleb's commits. Moreover, as you have said before, actively
participating is not always
easy, in particular in these days, and I try to still actively participate,
while focusing on points that I know well or matters most for us since I
have no time for more currently. I really wish to be able to do more.
Denis
Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
>
> This notion can be useful on:
> * the hall of fame page
> * the new download page where companies can list their number of active
> committers
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
5008
days inactive
5008
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Denis Gervalle -
Guillaume Lerouge -
Vincent Massol